Let BRAVO Know What You THINK About Their Homosexual Agenda!

07/29/03 | Kieri

[Kieri]

This morning I decided to let BRAVO have an earful. Here is my email:

"As a DirecTV subscriber, I am notifying you I am permanently blocking BRAVO from my menu on my DSS receiver.

Your push for homosexual-'friendly' programming demonstrates your pandering to an audience that exhibits behavior that is not only detrimental to their own health, but the health and safety of families everywhere. I refuse to risk allowing my children to see promo material on your channel, so I find it necessary to block BRAVO and will encourage others to do so. Your advertisers will no longer reach me or my family members, and I have let DirecTV know of our all too easy decision to block BRAVO.

You may consider a homosexual audience on worthy of pursuit, but families who treasure their own lifestyles think otherwise."

I encourage others to let both BRAVO and their cable/DSS companies know that you're blocking their agenda-pushing programming!

BRAVO's "Contact Us" page is here:

http://www.bravotv.com/Contact_Us/

OR you can smail mail them here:

Bravo Viewer Relations
c/o NBC Entertainment
3000 W. Alameda Ave.
Burbank, CA 90036

[wazoo1031]

Oooops..."laughing"

[finnman69]

I think it's a scream. And being a single woman, I am frustrated by how some single guys just don't even make an effort; they just slob out and then wonder why we're not attracted to them.

You mean the macho unshaven testosterne oozing fat slobs with ratty redneck t-shirts, beer guts hanging over their too small jeans are not doing it for you? LMAO!

[VetsRule]

So a man being emasculated by his girlfriend is watchable? Becoming/acting like a homosexual does not get you sex with women. At least we know who has the testicles in those relationships.

Which show did you watch? The one with the long-haired hard rock dude and his shrewish girlfriend? If so, everyone agreed the woman was a nightmare, and that he was being a pushover, and that he should kick her to the curb.

But the first two shows were great, the first one showed a slovenly single guy who couldn't get a girlfriend in the first place, turning into a completely new man. All of the women in his life were open-mouthed, and the guy had a confidence in his step and demeanor that was completely lacking before. My fiancee couldn't believe it either, she definitely thought he was hideous at first, but afterwards she thought he was quite handsome.

The second show had a goofy-looking married guy, who basically forgot his wife's birthday all the time. As the "Fab Five" made him over, it became obvious that he was a sweet guy, and loved his wife very much. He even gave a moving toast to his wife, and even though he might have been "sensitive," he hardly seemed like a wimp or a pushover.

Regardless, none of these guys were "acting like a homosexual." What they were doing was paying more attention to themselves, and gaining more confidence in themselves. And that is a good thing, both for self-esteem and for attractiveness to the opposite sex.

VR

[luckystarmom]

Okay, I need to lighten things up.

My 6 year old daughters know what the "F-word" is. We told them it means "Fraidy Cat".

My 8 year old son thought he was very smart and looked up the "F-word" in the dictionary. He looked up "FUNK". He was very surprised at what it meant.

[weegee]

Deviant sexual behavior? It has been observed in nature at approximately the same rates as it is observed in humans. (Don't have a link on me, it was a study I read a while back)

It IS deviant sexual behavior. Normal sexual behavior is the mating ritual (whether it be arrousal or fornication).

2 members of the same sex have no complimentary genitalia and engage in deviant sexual practices. Normal sexual intercourse has one genital that copulates with another dissimilar genital. An anus is not a genital, it is an orrifice by which waste matter passes. There is no natural lubrication released from this orrifice, that is why people who engage in the practice must use artificial lubes.

Shouldn't their bodies "evolve" to release lubrication from pores in their rectum?

Rape occurs in the animal world too. It still is not acceptable behavior. We are "civilized" and rise above our baser animal instincts.

The animals don't believe in an age of consent or even limit their mating urge to the same species. Doesn't make either of those practices acceptable in the human world.

[sakic]

We deserve to be blown off the face of the earth.

Be all that you can be. Sign up with Al Qaeda.

[MineralMan]

"My 6 year old daughters know what the "F-word" is. We told them it means "Fraidy Cat".

My 8 year old son thought he was very smart and looked up the "F-word" in the dictionary. He looked up "FUNK". He was very surprised at what it meant."

That's cute. Kids always know more than we suspect. It's up to us, as parents, to help them understand what they learn, I think. Every kid hears the F-word at a pretty young age. Our reaction to them learning it determines a lot about how they take it.

I actually remember hearing it the first time, over 50 years ago. I asked my mom what it meant. She told me what it meant and said that nice people simply don't use language like that. And that was that. I went on about my 7 year old business, but still remember what she told me.

[Marysecretary]

I had a young son who was molested from the time he was eight until he was twelve years old by a homosexual neighbor's son. We didn't know one thing about it until a couple of years ago. He's in his late 30's. I don't hate the young man who did this to him; I feel sorry for him, but he almost destroyed my son. I don't think you'd want the same thing for your child. Believe me, you wouldn't. The gays have an agenda. The tv shows that normalize them are a part of that agenda. I'm sorry you don't seem to be able to see that. I hope your child never suffers from that kind of pain.

[George W. Bush]

It's not your gaydar that's pinging. It's the hollow cavity in your skull echoing the pea gravel sized brain rattling around in it.

No, I checked for that. It's my gaydar all right.

[Allegra]

You mean the macho unshaven testosterne oozing fat slobs with ratty redneck t-shirts, beer guts hanging over their too small jeans are not doing it for you? LMAO!

...And the bad skin from not bothering to wash their faces regularly...

Nahh...they just don't do it for me...I guess I must be "high maintenance" or something. LOL

[MineralMan]

"Shouldn't their bodies "evolve" to release lubrication from pores in their rectum?"

My! You seem to have thought a great deal about how male homosexuals do things. I'm afraid I've never put all that much energy in imagining these things.

[Marysecretary]

As a Christian I am commanded to love them. It's called hating the sin but not the sinner. I know only too well what homosexuals do to children. I'm not pitching hay out of an empty wagon. I also know that all homosexuals don't recruit children. If you want to watch queer shows, that certainly is your prerogative. Others of us would rather not and many of us are aware of the deception that's going on.

[longtermmemmory]

the twin studies have been pretty much discredited due to the wild discrepancies of operational definitions.

There was one studey of fourteen (14) human brains which argued for a homosexual biology BUT that study was discredited (conducted by homosexual scientist) when a larger sample could not produce the same result. (LaVey I believe)

The one study that argued the Xq26 gen was the homo-gene was discredited by Canadian scientists.

You have to remember the human child is developing after birth. Even adults who have "fetishes" have their endocrine and pleasure centers activated by the fetish's presense. It may just be that children who have been recruited are just exhibiting that developmental defect. I doubt it.

You would have to distinguish people who have LOTS of sex from the homosexual lifestyle practitioners. If anything those that argue a genetic trait to homosexuality are ingnoring the mountain of contrary evidence and the defects in the studies themselves.

The question will ultimatly boil down to: (this is what homosexuals are working towards) acceptannce of homosexual behavior as a choice. The homos need the nature nurture argument to continue so the societal decensitization (neutering) can continue with queer indoctrination.

guard all the children from the deviants.

[longtermmemmory]

homosexuality in nature occurs the same way that homosexuality occurs in the human prison population. No members of the opposite sex. Once that changes then normal behavior resumes.

The homosexual behavior in nature is a myth.

[George W. Bush]

Ok, well if that's the analogy then the statement needs to be gay men who engage in promiscuous, unprotected sex lead a dangerous lifestyle. Being gay in and of itself is not dangerous. If the person is monoganous and careful, or at least as monogamous and careful as the average person, then chances are they'll be Ok.

You must be ignorant of the differences in the health risks between vaginal sex and anal sex, all the diseases and other problems associated with pretending that a anus contains a vagina. Not to mention the increased risks of having a dozen partners a night as some of these guys do before it kills them. Or the bug-chasers who deliberately catch AIDS, holding orgies so they can catch it. Even hookers don't do this stuff generally so hetero males don't have this problem. Not because they wouldn't want to do these things too but because females have a conservative self-preservation impulse.

There are reasons why the sodomite life expectancy is so short. No, not for all of them. But a lot of them are doing this stuff. In their community, 'gay' is generally synonymous with 'promiscuously homosexual'.

[luckystarmom]

Well, I didn't think it was being immasculated. The one I watched had a husband trying to do something nice for his wife for her birthday.

They had young kids, and their house was very kid-oriented. The "Fab 5" came in and fixed up the house. Then they helped the hubby buy some new clothes, get a nice haircut, buy some very nice jewlry for his wife, and they helped him throw a dinner party for her.

My hubby could use help if he tried to do that for me, and I would really be thankful if my husband did do that for me. (Especially fixing up the house and the jewlry.)

It didn't immasculate the male in any way. If the group that helped the husband were a group of 5 women, you wouldn't have said that. I liken it to a mother or a sister going out with their son/brother and helping him get dressed, fix up the house, etc.

[finnman69]

That's a horrible story and I feel terribly for you and your son, but for you to suggest that a show like Queer Eye encourages child molestation or advances some sort of gay agenda is utterly ridiculous.

[Marysecretary]

I do go to church and I do believe that our sinfulness in this area and in abortion will one day provoke God's wrath. He's not going to allow it to go on for much longer.

[jellybean]

Well gee. I watched an episode of that show with my wife. If kids were watching, they would have learned how to make Foie Gras, organize their closet, trim their hair, and how to accessorize an outfit. I hope my kids will never learn that filth.

You're right!!! Queer TV is the ONLY place in America where kids can learn those skills!! God forbid we leave it to PARENTS to teach manners, morals and values, how to dress appropriately, or how to cook!!

As we all know parents are too lazy, too ignorant and too self-centered to actually take the time to teach their childen social skills. Children are left to fend for themselves and only the homosexuals can save them.

Too bad past generations didn't have the benefit of Queer TV. We could have been spared the barbarities of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Winston Churchil and Ronald Reagan. They were such uncivilized louts!!!!!!

[Timesink]

Maybe the tiers will go by owner (although some networks would just as soon have it that you didn't know they were connected...). E.G. Viacom block (MTV, VH1, M2, VH1Classics, Nick, TV Land, Spike/TNN...), FOX Block (Fox Sports, Fox News, FX...), NBC Block (MSNBC, Bravo...), Time/Warner Block (CNN, TCM, ...), Time/Warner Premium Block (HBO1, HBO2, HBO Family, HBO..., Cinema, Mo' Max...).

My guess - and it is just a guess, of course - is that this is what they'll try at first, especially when the local cable company is directly related (Time Warner Cable will want to offer an all-AOLTW block, for example). But then one of the satellite companies will go all-out "a la carte" (most likely Rupert Murdoch with DirecTV; he hates the other media comglomerates AND the cable companies for how they screwed him over when he was launching FNC), and the network owners won't be able to do anything about it; they can choose to get only 50-75% of the revenues from DirectTV's 15-20 million subscribers that they were getting, or 0%. They'll take the 50-75%. And once a satellite company offers it, the local cable companies will have little choice but to fall in line.

You'd probably still get all broadcast channels ("basic cable") Meaning that Viacom's CBS, Disney's ABC, Fox, and Time-Warner's WB-UPN would all be exempt from "opt out" provisions. I think that current "cable" legislation even requires the signals to be carried if they are broadcast in a community.

Yeah, that is the law. The local cableco has to offer an ultra-cheap tier that consists of nothing but all local TV stations and whatever public access channels they run. (They usually throw in the home shopping channels too, since they get paid for those based on a cut of the sales from their subscribers, so they want everyone to see them.)