Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sport Utility Vehicle Owners of America
Sport Utility Vehicle Owners of America (SUVOA) ^ | July 26, 2003 | Grassroots staff

Posted on 07/26/2003 11:53:42 AM PDT by yoe

Dear Friend,

Oh Brother... It's Big Brother!! America's 24 million SUV owners are under attack again. A pair of liberal, U.S. Senators has fallen in lock step with the extremists who are dead set on dictating what kind of vehicle you drive. And they have your SUV on the most wanted list.

California's Sen. Diane Feinstein and Illinois' Sen. Richard Durbin are licking their liberal chops at the prospect of passing amendments to the Energy Bill that would essentially force SUVs, pickups and minivans to meet standards equal to cars. We all want better mileage but unrealistic government mandates will lead to serious tradeoffs that most people don't want: vehicles that cost more, are smaller, less powerful, less safe, and far less useful.

Picture the smallest SUV or pickup you've ever seen and that's the type that consumers would be left with. But that's not stopping elitist liberals, Hollywood millionaires or radical enviro-terrorists from claiming to know better than you what kind of automobile to drive. They don't care that SUV fuel economy has improved by 40%. They snub many hard-working Americans who consider SUVs, pickups and vans essential for work, like our hometown rescue squads and law enforcement units. They dismiss the fact that SUVs are as safe as cars. All they care about is taking away your vehicle, your choice and your freedom.

These reckless amendments threaten the very existence of SUVs, pickups and vans and roadway safety. If the Feinstein or Durbin amendments pass then you, your passengers and your roadway neighbors are at risk because the proposed standards would set extreme, unsafe, fuel economy levels for SUVs, minivans and pickups. Legislating yet-to-be invented automotive engineering advances is as irresponsible as legislating a cure for cancer. It's a legislative menace to the safety of America's highways and it's millions of SUV, minivan and light truck drivers and passengers. Cars are not trucks!

You can do something about it.

We need to put the brakes on these dangerous amendments immediately. There is no time to lose. Congress will vote on the Feinstein and Durbin amendments as early as Tuesday, July 29 and we need you to take action against these destructive proposals NOW before it's too late.

The Sport Utility Vehicle Owners of America (SUVOA) is recruiting the 24 million American SUV owners and others who depend on pickups and vans to join the battle against these self-appointed Car Czars and their anti-SUV obsession.

The first thing that must be done is to show Congress that we take our freedoms seriously. And that we take attacks on our freedoms even more seriously.

Right now you can do that by signing a letter rejecting the irresponsible amendments proposed by Feinstein and Durbin and sending it to your two U.S. Senators.

Together, we can stop this assault on our freedom to choose the vehicle that best meets our needs. Together, we can defeat absurd legislative proposals promoted by ambitious politicians and their willing special interest zealots. But we can only do it with you.

Click here to take action today!


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: carczarsaholes; demonized; discriminated; energybill; extremists; stupidpoliticians; suv
Please sign, also get hold of Feinstein and Durbin' offices today! Thanks.
1 posted on 07/26/2003 11:53:42 AM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yoe
This HAS GOT to be a hoax.
This is the first I've ever heard of it.
2 posted on 07/26/2003 11:56:40 AM PDT by The Brush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe
If they force SUV's to meet the same standards as cars, soccer moms will just buy Peterbuilts with sleeper compartments for their families. Then gov't can demand really big trucks meet auto standards too.
3 posted on 07/26/2003 12:32:47 PM PDT by umgud (gov't has more money than it needs, but never as much as it wants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Brush
It came via e-mail and Sport Utility Vehicle Owners of America (SUVOA)is well known. Go here: http://www.suvoa.org/MiniSite/miniabout.php

Grassroots is where we get things done.........

4 posted on 07/26/2003 12:34:06 PM PDT by yoe (Is stupidity a symptom or just genetics?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Brush
"This HAS GOT to be a hoax. This is the first I've ever heard of it."

http://www.off-road.com/ford/news/2002_01.html
"Some members of Congress and their allies have stepped up to the plate once again to make decisions for millions of consumers about our choice in vehicles. The will of the people and the concept of the free market and supporting market conditions are taking a backseat while politicians are under pressure from environmental extremists to impose further restrictions on our vehicle buying ability.

The auto industry can't possibly meet the standards proposed without radically changing the design of the vehicles and making them smaller, less powerful, less safe, and less desirable. No one wants to trust his or her family to a Flintstone-mobile."

http://www.visteon.com/newsroom/autoline/2003/051503.shtml
"Current National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) rules require a fleet average of 20.7 miles per gallon (mpg) for all light trucks sold by each manufacturer. Beginning in 2005, the number ratchets up to 21.0 and rises to 21.6 for 2006 and 22.2 in 2007. The CAFE number for passenger cars will remain at 27.5 mpg,

NHTSA says the move to make trucks more fuel efficient will save about 3.6 billion barrels of oil over the life of the affected vehicles.

Environmentalists charge the move is not strong enough, noting that overall fuel economy numbers for both cars and trucks has done a little backsliding in the last decade with the increasing popularity of larger sport utility vehicles. Critics in other camps contend that the move will push consumers to buy lighter vehicles that are not as safe.

The Bush Administration isn’t likely to appease the Green crowd, but it may in fact craft an answer to the “smaller isn’t safer” crowd. It’s considering further changes to the fuel economy rules that would encourage automakers to offer more medium size vehicle: large cars, station wagons and smaller sport utility vehicles built on car-like platforms."

http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Lobby/1818/3_1suv.htm
"The new fad, all the rage among yuppies, suburban families and seemingly testosterone unbalanced males, is the sport utility vehicle (SUV) as everyday commuting machine. Not only is the SUV a public menace, it’s true purpose has been abducted and distorted by Madison Avenue. And those who embrace this new transportation fad are so caught up in it, they throw away all common sense and reason in order to be part of a trend...
... The SUV culture is a very good example of rampant greed and selfishness in our society. On the one hand, greedy corporations are popularizing vehicles that aggravate an already bad pollution problem, as well as make the roads unsafe for the millions of Americans who choose to drive economical automobiles.

On the other hand, consumers are showing a great deal of selfishness by purchasing vehicles that are life threatening to their fellow citizens. They also show a great lack of respect for others on the road (see “SUVs, unsafe at any height” pg. 3), not to mention the environment and the world’s limited supply of oil.
We’ve already seen one war waged over the control of oil reserves. Since 1991, all Americans lives lost in the middle east (need I remind anyone of the bombing of the American barracks in Saudi Arabia) are a result of trying to satisfy our ever increasing dependency on oil. Are we so brainwashed by Madison Avenue and Wall Street that we will be willing to start wars to drive our big cars?"

[So the real reason we forcibly removed Saddam from power is to feed our SUVs!]

http://www.commondreams.org/pressreleases/june99/061699a.htm
"Americans could have reduced global warming pollution by 187 million tons per year and saved more than $13 billion if not for a loophole in miles per gallon laws for 45% of passenger vehicles sold last year, according to a report released today by U.S. PIRG. "Danger Ahead: Putting the Brakes on Global Warming Pollution" documents the excess global warming pollution, oil consumption, and gasoline expenditures caused by lower fuel economy standards for light trucks (a category comprised of Sport Utility Vehicles, minivans, and pick up trucks.)

"Sport Utility Vehicles and minivans don’t have to be gas guzzlers," said Katherine Silverthorne, Director of U.S. PIRG’s Campaign to Stop Global Warming. " Its time for automakers to stop taking advantage of the loophole in the miles per gallon standard and start making these vehicles go farther on a gallon of gas."


[I'm still looking for the bill referenced in the article that started this thread, but SUVs have been under attack for some time. As it is, the large station wagon was abandoned by the public and automakers in favor of the SUV as a direct result of CAFE. The SUV is the station wagon of today. Because of the fact that the US is a large, spread-out country, a suitable highway cruiser is optimal for many Americans.

The real reason for this (that which underlies all Leftist initiatives) is control for its own sake. Of course those who advocate this will reserve the right to drive their own gas-guzzlers; they are important people]



5 posted on 07/26/2003 12:52:49 PM PDT by dark_mooncat (...been telling people there's no Tooth Fairy since age 8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yoe
Today's SUVs are more fuel-efficient than cars of the 1980s.

Glad to see that people are waking up to the environazis and Limosuine Libs who want everyone else to drive a Beetle.

6 posted on 07/26/2003 12:56:58 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (EEE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
I like the scene from the movie "Deliver Us From Eva" with Gabrielle Union and rapper LL Cool J.

Before they went on a date Gabrielle's character starts screaming about the dangers of tiny cars. LL Cool J then says "that's why I drive this" and clicks the auto alarm for this huge meat semi-truck. Hilarious!

7 posted on 07/26/2003 1:00:25 PM PDT by ServesURight (FReecerely Yours,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Simple fuel-efficiency math::

An SUV that gets 15 mpg carrying 5 passengers = 75 mpg

Most of the SUV's I see in California are used by families and carpoolers.




8 posted on 07/27/2003 12:13:38 AM PDT by Susannah (Over 200 people murdered in L. A.County-first 5 mos. of 2003 & NONE were fighting Iraq!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: yoe
I'm so glad I drive a Saab.
9 posted on 07/27/2003 12:19:19 AM PDT by HitmanLV (I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson