What, exactly, IS your intent by continuing to raise this issue?
Don't try to play this on me.
I raised no issue here, and you're fully aware of that. I've responded to issues raised by others, such as I'll do with you now.
From your #264, on this thread...
Should one draw the conclusion that since the person being "questioned" is still posting, that JR has MADE the decision and this 'side-issue' should be dropped?
If it's acceptable to interpret silences as answers, how shall we interpret your silence as to the question of posters who violate posting guidelines established by Free Republic's management, and gloat about it in the forum?
Does your silence in this regard indicate you approve of gloating over the violation of posting guidelines?
What is your purpose in avoiding this question?
Saber, this is beneath you. You referred me to post #140 and asked me to read the 'gloating'.
You have an issue with Luis. Fine.
I simply pointed to your own words....that you have accepted the decision of the owner of this forum and you stated such.
You continue to question others about the intent and decision of the owner of this forum in order to get others to take sides. You ask others to take a position about the 'abuse of forum guidelines'. I will not do that.
JR has made his decision. It is NOT something I shall debate. If you have a problem with JR's decision...than I suggest you discuss it with him.
Unless I am mistaken....you have NOT raised this issue with JR on this thread. Why not?
If it's acceptable to interpret silences as answers, how shall we interpret your silence as to the question of posters who violate posting guidelines established by Free Republic's management, and gloat about it in the forum?
Does your silence in this regard indicate you approve of gloating over the violation of posting guidelines?
Courtesy ping to Jim Robinson.