Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gephardt Told to 'Get Facts Straight' After Blasting Bush
CNSNews.com ^ | 7/23/03 | Melissa Mullins

Posted on 07/23/2003 11:57:29 PM PDT by kattracks

CNSNews.com) - A senior Republican congressman is chastising one of his Democratic colleagues for comments about the Bush administration's Iraq policy, saying critics of the president should make sure they have the facts right before giving campaign speeches.

Rep. Christopher Cox (R-Calif.), chairman of both the House Policy Committee and the Homeland Security Committee, scolded House Minority Leader Rep. Richard Gephardt (D-Mo.), saying Gephardt needed to "get his facts straight" after criticizing the administration's Iraq war policy.

Gephardt, a candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination and supporter on the war with Iraq, attacked President Bush's foreign policy Tuesday in a speech before the Bar Association of San Francisco.

In the speech, Gephardt said: "Foreign policy is not a John Wayne movie, where we catch the bad guys, hoist a few cold ones, and then everything fades to black." He blasted the Bush administration for what he called a show of "momentary machismo" and said America should not "go it alone" with Iraq.

Later that same day, Cox fired a broadside at Gephardt. "America did not go it alone," said Cox. "The only people suggesting that, having removed Saddam, we quit and 'hoist a few cold ones,' are the isolationist Democrats to whom Rep. Gephardt was apparently directing his San Francisco remarks."

Cox noted that 49 different nations played some role in the war against Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein, with contributions ranging from active military support and intelligence to specialized biological and chemical response teams, as well as humanitarian and reconstruction aid.

In his San Francisco remarks, Gephardt said America may have won the war in Iraq, but it was in serious danger of losing the peace.

"We've got 147,000 Americans there now; we're spending $4 billion a month in Iraq; it's not mere machismo to resist asking allies for help. It's absolute insanity," said Gephardt

But Cox responded in a statement, asking: "How many exercises of diplomacy...will be sufficient before Rep. Gephardt acknowledges that negotiating and waiting is what the U.S. did for far too long?"

Calls to Gephardt's campaign headquarters seeking comment on Cox's remarks were not returned.

Meanwhile, in a progress report on the war's aftermath Wednesday, President Bush said, "Nineteen nations are providing troops to help stabilize Iraq," and he urged all nations to contribute "militarily and financially" toward the goal of a democratic Iraq.

E-mail a news tip to Melissa Mullins.

Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.


 



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Missouri; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2004; christophercox; gephardt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 07/23/2003 11:57:30 PM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
scolded House Minority Leader Rep. Richard Gephardt (D-Mo.), saying Gephardt needed to "get his facts straight" after criticizing the administration's Iraq war policy.

Uh Melissa, Gephart is no longer House Minority Leader! Note to Self: "When writing about getting facts straight, get facts straight!"

2 posted on 07/24/2003 12:08:53 AM PDT by SubMareener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The DespeRat Party deal in 'facts?' Come on!
3 posted on 07/24/2003 3:05:54 AM PDT by Ed_in_NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SubMareener
At one time most people would be shocked at the sloppiness of reporting of this nature. So obvious a mistake, it is a no - brainer.

So goes the NYT, so goes the rest of them.

4 posted on 07/24/2003 3:20:00 AM PDT by JZoback (Don't have such an open mind, your brain falls out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SubMareener
Jumped off the page at me as well. Sorta takes away her credibility. I quit reading the artilce after that line.
5 posted on 07/24/2003 3:50:29 AM PDT by ImpBill ("You are either with US or against US!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
E-mail a news tip to Melissa Mullins.

I just did. Told her she was a hack. ;D

6 posted on 07/24/2003 4:29:59 AM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JZoback
At one time most people would be shocked at the sloppiness of reporting of this nature

I'll tell you what I find shocking-- the expanding percentage of the population that isn't bothered at all by the sloppiness. "It isn't important. It's not a big deal. At least she tried. What she MEANT to say, that's all that matters. Everyone makes mistakes, and we should ALL get away with them!"

7 posted on 07/24/2003 4:39:16 AM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Still wrong 2 1/2 hours later. ;D
8 posted on 07/24/2003 6:50:02 AM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
LOL. Corrected now. He's just plain Dick Gephardt.
9 posted on 07/24/2003 9:55:21 AM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
LOL. Corrected now. He's just plain Dick Gephardt.
10 posted on 07/24/2003 9:55:47 AM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks; ohioWfan; Howlin; Peach; Miss Marple; Always Right; JohnHuang2; EggsAckley; ken5050; ...
The facts:

Some Democrats claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war. They complain about his prosecution of it. One person recently claimed Bush was the worst president in U.S. history.

Let's clear up one point: We didn't start the war on terror. Try to remember--It was started by terrorists on 9/11. Let's look at the "worst" president and mismanagement claims.

FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us: Japan did. From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year.

Truman finished that war and started one in Korea. North Korea never attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost, an average of 18,333 per year.

John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us.

Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost, an average of 5,800 per year.

Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent. Bosnia never attacked us. On the other hand, Clinton was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three times by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has now attacked us on multiple occasions.

In the two years since terrorists attacked us, President Bush has liberated two countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida, put nuclear inspectors in Lybia, Iran and North Korea without firing a shot, and captured a terrorist who slaughtered 300,000 of his own people.

We lost 600 soldiers, an average of 300 a year. Bush did all this abroad while not allowing another terrorist attack at home.

Worst president in history? These lib/dems are out on a limb, and sawing it off from their side.

11 posted on 02/24/2004 12:50:02 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"We should've waited until at least 3 American cities were blown to dust before we lifted a finger to defend American interests," Gephardt added. /sarcasm
12 posted on 02/24/2004 12:54:14 PM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
We didn't start the war on terror. Try to remember--It was started by terrorists on 9/11.

Correction, the war was started by the terrorists LONG before 9/11/01.
That was just the date that our leaders decided to fight back.

13 posted on 02/24/2004 12:54:51 PM PST by MrB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
I'll grant all your points, but that still does not solve the questions of inadequate funding for school programs and rampant racism and homophobia. Also you are ignoring the environmental degradation under the Bush administration. Finally, we need nationalized healthcare so no one will be without medical care when we want them to have it. (I think I hit all the bases!) So there!!
14 posted on 02/24/2004 1:16:30 PM PST by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ed_in_NJ
We are winning ~ the bad guys are losing ~ terrorists and the democrats are sad ~ very sad!

~~ Bush/Cheney 2004 ~~

15 posted on 02/24/2004 1:19:44 PM PST by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart
Actually, this is what's on there now: "CORRECTION: Fixes Rep. Gaphardt's title."

LOL, can they get anything right?
16 posted on 02/24/2004 1:21:44 PM PST by Guillermo (It's tough being a Miami Dolphins fan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt
Just how many more funds are needed for schools? Bush gave them all they wanted and more, but for libs, enough is never enough. How can the Republicans be responsible for racism and homophobia? They are social ills that the whole nation has to address. As for environmental degradation, give us some examples and I'll give you a lot more of how the envirowackos have more than wrecked the environment. A good example is the wacko's failure to protect the forests by not allowing them, through endless litigation (ie the Sierra Club Legal Fund that exists for one purpose--to stop Federal forest protection efforts), to eliminate bark beetles, dead trees and brush. Last year's fires in California were one result of that failure.
17 posted on 02/24/2004 2:29:26 PM PST by Paulus Invictus (4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Paulus Invictus
(I think I hit all the bases!) So there!!

The above should have been a dead giveaway that my post was intended sarcastically. Evidently, it wasn't obvious enough.

18 posted on 02/24/2004 3:42:21 PM PST by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt
T'wasn't that obvious! I fell for it, but my answer was good, no?
19 posted on 02/24/2004 7:28:31 PM PST by Paulus Invictus (4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
So who's Gephardt?
20 posted on 02/24/2004 7:34:36 PM PST by CommandoFrank (If GW is the terrorist's worst nightmare, Kerry is their wet dream...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson