Skip to comments.
Cowboy conservationists race to preserve ranches
San Jose Mercury News ^
| 21 July 2003
| Paul Rogers
Posted on 07/21/2003 11:02:37 AM PDT by CounterCounterCulture
Edited on 04/13/2004 3:31:35 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Out in the golden hills of southern Monterey County, two hours south of Salinas in an area so rural the county doesn't paint lines on the roads, Jack Varian has spent the past 41 years roping, branding and herding cattle.
(Excerpt) Read more at bayarea.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: California
KEYWORDS: conservationists; cowboys; environment; landgrab; openland; ranchers; rangeland; urbansprawl
To: CounterCounterCulture
The #1 issue in North Dakota is depopulation. Come on up North, pardner! You can buy 10 times the rangeland up here, and there ain't any pesky liberals to get in the way....
2
posted on
07/21/2003 11:24:58 AM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(Racism is the codified policy of the USA .... - The Supremes)
To: Brad Cloven
Homer Simpson: "There is no North Dakota!"
;-)
3
posted on
07/21/2003 11:31:01 AM PDT
by
CounterCounterCulture
(I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
To: CounterCounterCulture
Real pretty country. Not many people, either.
To: CounterCounterCulture
read later
To: farmfriend
ping
To: CounterCounterCulture; AAABEST; Ace2U; Alamo-Girl; Alas; amom; AndreaZingg; Anonymous2; ...
Rights, farms, environment ping.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
7
posted on
07/21/2003 1:34:51 PM PDT
by
farmfriend
( Isaiah 55:10,11)
To: CounterCounterCulture; farmfriend
I like land trusts and conservation easements as a choice. However, I tend to think of them on a very small scale that we have here, where estuaries and rivers flow through small parcels of land, and setbacks and good environmental stewardship would encourage development setbacks measured in feet not acres....
I wonder, in the case of these easements, how hard they would be for his kids or grandkids to undo if the way growth happened anyway 50 years from now, they found themselves owning a big tract of land now completely surrounded by development anyway. Right now.... selling the ranch as a ranch is a smart business decision.... but if the ranches around him get swallowed up by more "valuable" land use, one can no longer say that it is a good deal for his land to be worth hundreds an acre rather than many thousands. It would be pretty impossible to not feel robbed.
To: farmfriend
BTTT!!!!!
9
posted on
07/21/2003 1:52:39 PM PDT
by
E.G.C.
To: CounterCounterCulture
Bump
10
posted on
07/21/2003 3:17:45 PM PDT
by
Valin
(America is a vast conspiracy to make you happy.)
To: CounterCounterCulture
I have long been a staunch supporter of the USDA Conservation Reserve Program (CRP)
http://www.fsa.usda.gov/dafp/cepd/default.htm This is a long-term lease arrangement and not a conservation easement.
At this time, I cannot endorse conservation easements as a recommended strategy. An easement permanently transfers an ownership interest in the land - generally, it is a split estate interest in the use permitted of that land. (These are commonly mischaracterized as sale of "development rights." Most commonly, they are for a specific purpose, such as riparian or wildlife conservation.) The easement can be bought and sold and is frequently purchased by a federal agency and transferred to a land trust or vice versa.
Conservation Easements commonly have a "third party suit" clause. This allows both the owner of the easement AND any person or organization claiming an interest in the conserved values to sue the underlying landowner to require them to manage in a certain way or eliminate all uses that are not consistent with the protected values, (including a house.) This has resulted in farmers selling "development rights" and losing all the viable commercial use of the land.
http://www.paragonpowerhouse.org/what_you_need_to_know_about_cons.htm &
http://www.wcel.org/wcelpub/10362/10362_5.html To buy out of the easement generally costs far more than the land is worth due to accruing interest.
There can also be various negative tax implications.
11
posted on
07/22/2003 2:21:58 PM PDT
by
marsh2
To: marsh2
There can also be various negative tax implications.
...And they can be HUGE.
I concur; be well
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson