Skip to comments.
Anyone see this comic today from the LA Times (Gun to the head of the President)
LA Times ^
| July 20, 2003
Posted on 07/20/2003 4:54:42 PM PDT by jern
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: latimes; liberalmedia; michaelramirez; ramirez
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 241-251 next last
To: b4its2late
I think UncleDick has it right- this is a pro-Bush cartoon, not an anti-Bush cartoon.
81
posted on
07/20/2003 5:45:31 PM PDT
by
William McKinley
(You're so vain, you probably think this tagline's about you)
To: jern
I hope everyone here recognizes this picture. It is a rendering on one of the two most graphic images to come out of the Vietnam conflict (the other was the little girl whose village was just napalmed) and these photos changed the course of the war.
82
posted on
07/20/2003 5:47:51 PM PDT
by
Archangelsk
("I love big mouthed frogs. Especially when they're sauteed." The Alligator)
To: breakem
There's certainly enough paranoia to go around; that's the pomo substitute for truth and honor.
To: breakem
Bingo. Sorry I missed your earlier post.
84
posted on
07/20/2003 5:49:13 PM PDT
by
Pharmboy
(Dems lie 'cause they have to...)
To: jern
I asked on the other thread too. What was the FR attitude when the Bill Clinton shooting targets were the rage of the day?
85
posted on
07/20/2003 5:49:40 PM PDT
by
KCmark
(I am NOT a partisan.)
To: UncleDick
I agree. The cartoon is pro-Bush and depicts politics, read dummycrats, as being out of order.
86
posted on
07/20/2003 5:52:53 PM PDT
by
meatloaf
To: Prodigal Son
And that wasn't even drawn by Ted Rall.Or Ben Sargent!
87
posted on
07/20/2003 5:54:30 PM PDT
by
BradyLS
To: UncleDick
Actually, Ramirez is a conservative. The cartoon is pro-Bush, decrying the lib's attempts to indulge in character assassination through petty politics... there's no evil conspiracy here.
Thank you!
88
posted on
07/20/2003 5:55:51 PM PDT
by
AnnaZ
(unspunwithannaz.blogspot.com... "It is UNSPUN and it is Unspun, but it is not unspun." -- unspun)
To: jern
Ramirez is generally pretty good. He sure fell of the cliff here. Depicting the president in the manner is unacceptable to me.
To: ladyinred
What kind of people are these lefties anyway?Uh... Ramirez is a conservative.
90
posted on
07/20/2003 5:59:26 PM PDT
by
Redcloak
(All work and no FReep makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no FReep make s Jack a dul boy. Allwork an)
To: ladyinred
91
posted on
07/20/2003 6:00:30 PM PDT
by
blam
To: jern
Very bad taste.
An outrage.
92
posted on
07/20/2003 6:01:12 PM PDT
by
ppaul
To: Pharmboy
Thank you, no problem. I thought I made a mistake last year, but I was wrong. C-YA
93
posted on
07/20/2003 6:03:51 PM PDT
by
breakem
To: jern
Judging the cartoon in its entirety, the cartoonist appears to be quite sympathetic to Bush.
People who don't exercise care to study the cartoon in its entirety will either be outraged (normal people) or thrilled (liberals).
To: Archangelsk
I hope everyone here recognizes this picture . . .As I recall, the shooter was chief of police (or something similar) for Saigon and the man he executed had been apprehended for murdering a vietnamese official and his entire family.
Also, IIRC, the now ex-police chief lives somewhere in Virginia where he owns and operates a restaurant.
To: ladyinred
The left would be dancing in the streets if something happened to W.
To: Steel Wolf; Brooklyn_Park_MD
Uhh, so W is a prisoner about to be capped without a trial by the Vietnamese? No, the toon is saying that the media wants to do the same job on America as they did back in the Vietnam days. Anyone concluding that it's a threat or even an ill wish on Bush should have his head examined.
If you want real ugliness, look at this one from right here on FR, strangely reminiscent of an insane maniac known elsewhere as JRadcliffe:
97
posted on
07/20/2003 6:15:23 PM PDT
by
Cachelot
(~ In waters near you ~)
To: Dog
What an outrage; hope someone loses their job over this.
98
posted on
07/20/2003 6:16:56 PM PDT
by
Peach
To: jern
Hatred blinds.
But in the case of the LS Times, who would read it anyway.
99
posted on
07/20/2003 6:18:40 PM PDT
by
snooker
To: jern
Incredibly poor taste. But there's no accounting for taste.
100
posted on
07/20/2003 6:19:41 PM PDT
by
Glenn
(What were you thinking, Al?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 241-251 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson