Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Masturbating may protect against prostate cancer (Hold Muh ... Oh Never Mind)
New Scientist ^ | July 16, 2003 | Douglas Fox

Posted on 07/16/2003 11:39:00 PM PDT by Timesink

NewScientist.com

 
 

Masturbating may protect against prostate cancer

 
19:00 16 July 03

Douglas Fox, Adelaide

 

It will make you go blind. It will make your palms grow hairy. Such myths about masturbation are largely a thing of the past. But the latest research has even better news for young men: frequent self-pleasuring could protect against the most common kind of cancer.

A team in Australia led by Graham Giles of The Cancer Council Victoria in Melbourne asked 1079 men with prostate cancer to fill in a questionnaire detailing their sexual habits, and compared their responses with those of 1259 healthy men of the same age. The team concludes that the more men ejaculate between the ages of 20 and 50, the less likely they are to develop prostate cancer.

The protective effect is greatest while men are in their twenties: those who had ejaculated more than five times per week in their twenties, for instance, were one-third less likely to develop aggressive prostate cancer later in life (BJU International, vol 92, p 211).

The results contradict those of previous studies, which have suggested that having had many sexual partners, or a high frequency of sexual activity, increases the risk of prostate cancer by up to 40 per cent. The key difference is that these earlier studies defined sexual activity as sexual intercourse, whereas the latest study focused on the number of ejaculations, whether or not intercourse was involved.

  The prostate produces part of the fluid that makes up semen
The prostate produces part of the fluid that makes up semen

The team speculates that infections caused by intercourse may increase the risk of prostate cancer. "Had we been able to remove ejaculations associated with sexual intercourse, there should have been an even stronger protective effect of other ejaculations," they suggest. "Men have many ways of using their prostate which do not involve women or other men," Giles adds.


Macho exaggeration

Giles accepts the possibility that the men who completed the questionnaires could have lied about their habits. But he doubts this skewed the results, since questions about masturbation are unlikely to evoke the same macho exaggeration as questions about, say, number of sexual partners.

But why should ejaculating more often cut the risk of prostate cancer? The team speculates that ejaculation prevents carcinogens building up in the gland. The prostate, together with the seminal vesicles, secretes the bulk of the fluid in semen, which is rich in substances such as potassium, zinc, fructose and citric acid.

Generating the fluid involves concentrating these components from the bloodstream up to 600-fold - and this could be where the trouble starts. Studies in dogs show that carcinogens such as 3-methylcholanthrene, found in cigarette smoke, are also concentrated in prostate fluid.

"It's a prostatic stagnation hypothesis," says Giles. "The more you flush the ducts out, the less there is to hang around and damage the cells that line them."


Sexual repertoire

His findings suggest an intriguing parallel between prostate cancer and breast cancer, as recent studies indicate that lactating reduces a woman's risk of breast cancer, perhaps because this also flushes out carcinogens. Alternatively, ejaculation might induce prostate cells to mature fully, making them less susceptible to carcinogens.

"All these mechanisms are totally speculative," cautions breast cancer expert Loren Lipworth of the International Epidemiology Institute in Rockville, Maryland.

But if the finding is confirmed, future health advice from doctors may no longer be restricted to diet and exercise. "Masturbation is part of people's sexual repertoire," says Anthony Smith, deputy director of the Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society at La Trobe University in Melbourne.

"If these findings hold up, then it's perfectly reasonable that men should be encouraged to masturbate," he says.

 
19:00 16 July 03
 


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last
Give these researchers a big hand!
1 posted on 07/16/2003 11:39:00 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mhking
ping!
2 posted on 07/16/2003 11:39:15 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Book her, Dano.
>

Support the finest site on the web. Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!


3 posted on 07/16/2003 11:40:31 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Giles accepts the possibility that the men who completed the questionnaires could have lied about their habits. But he doubts this skewed the results, since questions about masturbation are unlikely to evoke the same macho exaggeration as questions about, say, number of sexual partners.

Macho exaggeration? Most guys don't brag about how many times they've managed to "get lucky" with Palmela. I would guess more of the opposite would take place. This researcher is definitely smarter than his critics (and probably less likely to die of prostate cancer).

4 posted on 07/16/2003 11:41:33 PM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
I bet this won't be long for hte world - same story has been posted twice - moved to the Smokey Backroom, and I don't see them in there anymore.
5 posted on 07/16/2003 11:41:41 PM PDT by Keith in Iowa (Tag line produced using 100% post-consumer recycled ethernet packets,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Support Free Republic
How could you put that photo on a masturbation thread? How could you???? THE HUMANITY!!!
6 posted on 07/16/2003 11:42:01 PM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa
Here's the other thread...http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/947481/posts
7 posted on 07/16/2003 11:43:25 PM PDT by Keith in Iowa (Tag line produced using 100% post-consumer recycled ethernet packets,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
How could you put that photo on a masturbation thread? How could you???? THE HUMANITY!!!

Someone put a Kournikova pic up...QUICK!!!

8 posted on 07/16/2003 11:44:26 PM PDT by RandallFlagg ("There are worse things than crucifixion...There are teeth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa
I bet this won't be long for hte world - same story has been posted twice - moved to the Smokey Backroom, and I don't see them in there anymore.

The word must be spread!

9 posted on 07/16/2003 11:45:20 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa
Well, that is, technically a different article. Same subject, different source.
10 posted on 07/16/2003 11:46:13 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Cheaper than herbal supplements.
11 posted on 07/16/2003 11:47:55 PM PDT by secretagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: secretagent
Floss teeth and brush for 2 minutes. Check.

Walk for 20 minutes. Check.

One glass of red wine. Check.

Magazine research. Check.

Sigh. Health maintenance takes so much time, but I guess it has benefits.
12 posted on 07/16/2003 11:54:26 PM PDT by secretagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
I'm taking the fifth on this one.
13 posted on 07/16/2003 11:56:43 PM PDT by King Prout (people hear and do not listen, see and do not observe, speak without thought, post and not edit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Well, I must be safe.
14 posted on 07/16/2003 11:56:54 PM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Timesink; nutmeg; Clemenza; PARodrig; firebrand; RaceBannon; Yehuda; Coleus; Black Agnes; Dutchy; ..
This is nothing but a propaganda piece to make Liberals and Democrats feel good about themselves.

Everybody knows they are a bunch of jerkoffs.





15 posted on 07/16/2003 11:57:08 PM PDT by Cacique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Yes but it will make you go blind.
16 posted on 07/16/2003 11:58:48 PM PDT by ETERNAL WARMING
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
just a side "issue" - I don't think that the vas deferens is routed THROUGH the pubic symphisis. bad technical graphic.
17 posted on 07/16/2003 11:59:14 PM PDT by King Prout (people hear and do not listen, see and do not observe, speak without thought, post and not edit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETERNAL WARMING
Just do it until you need glasses!
18 posted on 07/17/2003 12:03:42 AM PDT by Riverman94610
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
I wonder where her other hand is?????
19 posted on 07/17/2003 12:07:42 AM PDT by U S Army EOD (Served in Vietnam and Korea and still fighting America's enemies on the home front)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Riverman94610
<>Just do it until you need glasses! >

<Ithinkkkg\ ii nedd gl aaass ssses/

20 posted on 07/17/2003 12:11:29 AM PDT by Captainpaintball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson