Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

When the right was right (Buchanan on Senator Joseph McCarthy)
www.townhall.com ^ | May 12, 2003 | Pat Buchanan

Posted on 07/14/2003 5:09:13 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe

Why do they keep digging up the corpse of Joe McCarthy for a ritual flogging? The Wisconsin senator died in 1957. He never killed anyone. He never sent anyone to prison.

Harry Truman dropped atomic bombs on two defenseless cities of a prostrate nation and sent 2 million Russian prisoners back to Stalin to be murdered in Operation Keelhaul. Yet Truman remains a hero to those who despise McCarthy with an undying hatred.

Why? Even if what is alleged is true -- that McCarthy bullied witnesses and accused men of disloyalty who only made mistakes -- that still does not explain why the Left cannot let go of him.

The answer: As no other man, Tailgunner Joe stripped the old establishment of its reputation, credibility and moral authority in the eyes of the people. McCarthy convinced Middle America that FDR and Truman had been duped by "Uncle Joe," had tolerated treason, and had blundered and lost in five years all the fruits of the victory won by the blood and sacrifice of the Greatest Generation in World War II.

The establishment has never recovered from that beating.

In the latest document dump by the Senate, we learn -- horror of horror! -- that McCarthy questioned witnesses in private before selecting those he put on the stand. But so, too, did the Watergate committee of the sainted Sam Ervin. This is a common practice of senators who don't want to be surprised before TV cameras.

The New York Times' Sheryl Gay Stolberg writes that those few historians shown the latest documents claim they "do not support McCarthy's theories that, in the 1950s, communist spies were operating in the highest levels of government."

Perhaps not, Ms. Stohlberg. But if so, that is only because, by the 1950s, the spies had been rooted out, though their collaborators remained. But they had been there, selling out their country.

Indeed, the espionage and treason, proven again by the Venona transcripts -- the intercepted coded messages from Soviet agents to Moscow -- were far more extensive than even McCarthy imagined. In the 1940s, the U.S. Government was honeycombed with traitors and spies. Even today, not all the names have been revealed. Call the roll:

-- Alger Hiss and Lawrence Duggan, two of the highest ranking diplomats at State, were communist traitors and spies. Hiss stood behind FDR at Yalta when Eastern Europe was signed away to Stalin and helped shape the United Nations for Harry Truman.

-- Harry Dexter White, father of the International Monetary Fund and the "Morgenthau Plan" to smash all German industry after the war -- a plan embraced, then disowned, by FDR -- was a Soviet agent. Truman knew it by 1946 and covered it up.

-- Lauchlin Currie was a Soviet spy on the White House staff.

-- William Remington was the Soviet spy at Commerce.

-- Judith Coplon headed up a spy ring at Justice with access to the FBI secrets and files she transferred to Soviet agents.

-- The Rosenbergs were communist traitors who gave their Russian handlers secrets of the atom bomb. The brother of Robert Oppenheimer, father of the A-bomb, was a communist, as was his wife, who was a lifelong friend of Steve Nelson, a key figure in the Communist Party underground apparatus.

On and on the list goes. For an unbiased account of McCarthy's life, Arthur Herman's Joseph McCarthy: Reexamining the Life and Legacy of America's Most Hated Senator is indispensable.

McCarthy's career as an anti-Communist began in February 1950 with his Wheeling speech and was effectively ended with his censure in December 1954. Why was Harry Truman chased out of Washington in 1952 with an approval rating of 23 percent? Why did Joe McCarthy enjoy a 50-29 favorable rating as late as January 1954?

Because McCarthy, almost alone, was exposing the treason and folly of those who had ceded half of Europe to Stalin and all of China to the murderous hordes of Mao Tse-tung. And with 200 American boys dying every week in Truman's "no-win war" in Korea, Americans were demanding explanations.

The 1950s were good years. No one was terrified then, except the fools who had joined a Communist Party that turned out to be a lickspittle of the Comintern. Gallup polls of the era show not even 1 percent of Americans were concerned about "witch-hunting" or "anti-Communist hysteria" or "McCarthyism." That is pure myth.

In 1954, when some snot at the 15th reunion of his class got up to toast Harvard College for never having produced an Alger Hiss or a Joe McCarthy, John F. Kennedy stood up and walked out, roaring, "How dare you couple the name of a great American patriot with that of a traitor." Yes, indeed, that was when the Right was right.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: communism; huac; keephatinthemjoos; mccarthy; naziwannabes; patbuchanan; polls; witchhunt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-257 next last

1 posted on 07/14/2003 5:09:13 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DPB101; HISSKGB; backhoe; nopardons; quietolong; marron; Stultis; NormsRevenge; RaceBannon; ...
McCarthy was right bump list. Freepmail me if you want on or off.
2 posted on 07/14/2003 5:13:08 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Strong Conservative Forums Help Prevent Candidates Like This From Winning Elections

Finish Strong. Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

3 posted on 07/14/2003 5:13:14 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
I enjoy applauding Pat when he nails it.
4 posted on 07/14/2003 5:14:39 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Harry Truman dropped atomic bombs on two defenseless cities of a prostrate nation

Sorry, the writer lost me with that ridiculous, asinine, leftist statement.

5 posted on 07/14/2003 5:14:50 AM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
OOps ,forgot about that one.Pat ALMOST nailed it!
6 posted on 07/14/2003 5:16:05 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
The absence of Ann Coulter's name is a glaring ommission to this piece. Shame on Pat -- he prints a summation of her currently best-selling book and acts like it's all his thinking.
7 posted on 07/14/2003 5:18:01 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
I think Pat subscribes to the theory that the A's were dropped on predominently Catholic cities. They were chosen because of population not strategery.

Maybe someone can pull that reference from somewhere, but I remember some statement.
8 posted on 07/14/2003 5:22:12 AM PDT by OpusatFR (Using pretentious arcane words to buttress your argument means you don't have one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Harry Truman dropped atomic bombs on two defenseless cities of a prostrate nation

Sorry, the writer lost me with that ridiculous, asinine, leftist statement.

Pat goes over the top here - but I suspect that is exactly what the left would have said/still be saying about the Hiroshima & Nagasaki bombs if Truman had been Republican.

9 posted on 07/14/2003 5:23:29 AM PDT by FairWitness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Considering how Pat is regarded around amongst conservatives these days, he may have done her a favor.
10 posted on 07/14/2003 5:23:32 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR
Nagasaki had a sizeable Catholic population. Hiroshima did not.

I'm a staunch Catholic, but I'm not a paranoid. I highly doubt that our war plan in the Pacific was a "conspiracy against the Papists."

11 posted on 07/14/2003 5:24:54 AM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Same here, and I think any idea that there was a conspiracy to bomb Catholics is a bit over-the-top, but some circles actually believe it.

Thanks for the clarification.
12 posted on 07/14/2003 5:27:39 AM PDT by OpusatFR (Using pretentious arcane words to buttress your argument means you don't have one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
The absence of Ann Coulter's name is a glaring ommission to this piece. Shame on Pat -- he prints a summation of her currently best-selling book and acts like it's all his thinking.

I agree that Pat should have mentioned Ann's book at some point in this piece as it is such a big factor in driving the current McCarthy debate and documenting/bolstering the pro-McCarthy position.

But, to suggest Pat could not have written this exact piece without gleaning info from reading Ann's book is wrong. Pat knows this story inside and out.
13 posted on 07/14/2003 5:38:54 AM PDT by mr.pink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mr.pink
Yes, Pat knows this stuff. I don't mean to imply that he needs help gathering his facts. My point is this:

The only people in the world who know that Pat Buchanan exists are people who follow US Politics.
Of that group, the only people who READ Pat Buchanan are people who consider themselves on the Right.
Without question, the best-selling book within that group of people is Ann Coulter's "Treason".
The majority of press coverage of "Treason" focuses on her rehabilitation of Joe McCarthy.

So, Pat Buchanan writes an essay focusing on the rehabilitation of Joe McCarthy, which will only be read by the same demographic group which is buying so many copies of Ann Coulter's book -- and he doesn't even mention her book??

It seems to me to be common courtesy, even common decency.

14 posted on 07/14/2003 5:49:46 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FairWitness
Great point: no doubt, if a Pubbie President had dropped nuclear weapons on Japan we would have NEVER HEARD THE END OF IT...EVER.
15 posted on 07/14/2003 5:53:58 AM PDT by Pharmboy (Dems lie 'cause they have to...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
It seems to me to be common courtesy, even common decency.

I agree. I'm actually surprised he didn't give her any props.
16 posted on 07/14/2003 5:55:49 AM PDT by mr.pink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mr.pink
Freepers are great and Buchannan invariably ends up smelling like week old fish. Even this article which on first reading seems like it's a breath of fresh air, has 2 demonstrable flaws (knock on Truman for dropping A bomb, and no props for Ann) and the whiff of another flaw (anti-Catholic bias in which cities to bomb).

Ann's book as definitely had an impact - she's done everyone a service by putting the issue of the left's treachery back in play.
17 posted on 07/14/2003 6:18:12 AM PDT by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Why is deploring the unnecessary mass murder of thousands of babies "asinine?"
18 posted on 07/14/2003 6:18:43 AM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mr.pink
Pat wrote this column in early May, and Coulter's book is one of several (hers being a polemic versus some more investigative/academic) McCarthy books coming out in the next year.

Looking at some of these posts it would seem many did not read/see Buckley's rather lukewarm book on McCarthy from a few years ago or were completely unaware that Coulter really presented nothing new to what Murray Rothbard, the John Birch Society, conservatives amongst others have been saying for years. I suspect these are the same people who, like Coulter, have yet to deal with deeper implications about Stalinist spies angling FDR into a war with Japan.
19 posted on 07/14/2003 6:20:25 AM PDT by JohnGalt (They're All Lying)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt; ClearCase_guy; 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
Pat wrote this column in early May,

Nice eyes JohnGalt. Seems Pat, at that point in time, had no obligation to mention Ann.
20 posted on 07/14/2003 6:26:54 AM PDT by mr.pink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-257 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson