Hillary's Plans to Take the White House

Conservative Book Service ^ | 12 July 2003 | Conservative Book Service Email

[PhiKapMom]

Today's CONSERVATIVE ALERT is a special message for xxxxxx xxxxxxx from Conservative Book Service:

Hillary's Plans to Take the White House

Your worst fears may be about to come true. Hillary's Scheme: Inside the Next Clinton's Ruthless Agenda to Take the White House exposes the Clintons' long-range, highly detailed plan to make Hillary President of the United States -- and yes, despite her official denials, she's still mulling over a run in 2004.

In shocking detail, investigative journalist Carl Limbacher here blows the lid off the New York senator's plans for a grand political coup, something she has been carefully and quietly plotting for more than 20 years. With a patience, doggedness, and thirst for the truth that few reporters have displayed, Limbacher got the full story of Hillary's plans by conducting extensive research into Hillary's past and securing exclusive interviews with Clinton insiders. He even questioned Hillary herself! Limbacher uncovers the juicy morsels, backroom deals, and insider wrangling surrounding Hillary's presidential ambitions -- the hidden details that the mainstream press is too intimidated by (or enamored of) the Clintons to tell you about.

Think that Hillary doesn't stand a chance to become President? Limbacher shows how they'll get around potential and real scandals of a magnitude that ended the careers of many politicians less resourceful and ruthless than they are. He explains how the Clintons' approach to issues that could derail their plans -- such as Whitewater and Bill's thirst for bimbos -- has been consistently characterized by a brazen disregard for the rule of law and even for common decency. With startling precision, Limbacher also draws parallels between today's political environment and that which existed in 1992 -- the year George H. W. Bush lost the race to an upstart governor from Arkansas.

Limbacher reveals the real answers to questions Hillary avoids in public -- and much more, including:

• Why Hillary is not likely to wait until 2008 to enter the race for President

• How Hillary torpedoed Al Gore's chances for a rematch with President Bush

• The Clintons: why they're the most calculating and cold-blooded political team America has seen since John and Robert Kennedy

• Compelling evidence that Hillary has accepted money from Muslim groups with open sympathy for terrorists

• The eleventh-hour dirty tricks machine that beat Bush the father in 1992 and almost beat Bush the son in 2000 -- a machine that Hillary is ready to use again when she runs

• Conclusive evidence of bribery in the last-minute pardon frenzy just before Bill Clinton left office

• Remember the furor over Hillary's calling an aide a "Jew b-----d"? It wasn't the only time she has indulged in vicious slurs

• How the Clintons have effectively silenced publicity about Bill's philandering (including details about the stash of explosives discovered in a Clinton security agent's car)

You don't even have to be a member of the "vast right-wing conspiracy" to be concerned about what Hillary in the White House would mean for the presidency, the Constitution, and America as we know it. Get all the facts that she and the media don't want you to know in Hillary's Scheme.

[PhiKapMom]

Very well stated.

My paper here in Oklahoma thinks her book should be fiction. They took after Simon and Schuster paying her that kind of money for a book that said nothing that could be believed.

[PhiKapMom]

I don't think she can win either in the long run but what bothers me is that the Clintons never have played a fair game and would not expect them to do so now!

I think this last week of media attacks on President Bush were a trial run by the Clintons to get something to stick!

[PhiKapMom]

Personally I think there would be a record turnout of voters and all those voters that stayed home in 2000 would turn out in droves to defeat Hillary beating the turnout for Republicans in 1994 when they had the Contract for America.

Have a hunch a lot of non-voters in previous elections would join us broken glass Republicans to vote against Hillary.

[PhiKapMom]

THAT IS THE NIGHTMARE WE MUST BE PREPARED TO DEAL WITH.

That statement is exactly why I put up this thread -- we have got to be prepared to deal with Hillary Clinton as the RAT candidate and can leave no stone unturned in defeating her.

[PhiKapMom]

Thanks for posting those on this thread! Very appropriate!

[PhiKapMom]

I think it will backfire as well and is a great chance to put the lid back on the Hillary run for President in '04. Cannot see her running if she thinks she will lose unless everyone tells her she will win and she is dumb enough to believe them.

[PhiKapMom]

ROFLOL!!!!!!!!!! Your pic in #350 is priceless!

[John Lenin]

Private Benjamin

[Ragtime Cowgirl]

Awwww! President Bush is a man who loves his family very much.

The press has been AWOL re. covering our gracious First Lady Laura. Where's OUR press? We didn't elect these reporters. They don't stand for our values. How can they be trusted to represent US on the world stage?

[WFTR]

I have no doubt that her campaign would be what you describe. I just don't believe that she could make it work.

WFTR
Bill

[PhiKapMom]

It should also be noted that Ross Perot garnered some of Bushes votes. How many of the current whiners voted third party or not at all in 92, thus ushering in the Clinton era?

I couldn't agree with you more. I am still astounded Perot got that many votes. Will always believe the Clintons got Perot back in the race since his campaign manager was seen with Carville in Dallas. The biggest affront is when the whiners say their voting for Perot or that Perot in the race did NOT make a difference. How dumb do they think we are. Blame on Bush and no new taxes pledge. They take one sentence and say that cost him the election and we got a Governor of AR. Give me a break!

As for the people along with Rush that say Bush is notconservative enough, then they should be happy with Hillary or any other liberal so they could really complain and they think the rest of us would agree with them.

Saying right here and now if these whiners and anti-Bush people keep up the rhetoric on here that has been going on including on this thread, and President Bush would happen to lose, I will not be around here to join their attacks on the RAT in the White House because I would never speak to them again for making us lose the White House. This broken glass Republican has had it with the anti-Bush bashing and the two parties are alike crowd along with the one issue voters. If they cannot see the forest for the trees and the difference in the parties, then they are here to cause disrupton on this forum and nothing more.

RAT mantra is to portray both parties alike! Some on here seem to fit that bill.

Off my soapbox for the night!

[185JHP]

You're right - you don't have to have an advanced degree to see who benefits from this stuff- interesting things are gonna happen between now and Nov. 94! FReegards

[PhiKapMom]

Very well stated. The Senate is key IMO along with bigger numbers in the House.

I think a lot of this may be hype but also a realist enough to see that Hillary could run a really dirty, nasty campaign and who knows what she has up her sleeve.

I put up about poll watchers. They are absolutely mandatory for 2004. They helped a lot in 2002 IMO and reason we didn't have the fraud of 2000! We also control DOJ now!

Necessary to always run like you are 20 points down in the polls and don't quit until election night and the polls are all closed. Worst thing that can be done is to take a race forgranted!

[PhiKapMom]

Same reaction here in OK! Her candidacy is DOA in Texas and Oklahoma!

[WFTR]

I am not a person who believes 2004 will be like 1992. I just think this will be a nasty campaign. I believe that President Bush will win in the end because there is no credible 3rd party candidate to run like Perot although Perot and credible should not be used in the same sentence. <

I was in Texas in 1992 and still cannot believe people swallowed the Perot line!

I didn't mean to imply that you agreed with the content of the original commentary. I realize that you post a great deal of information just to educate us about what is being said, and I appreciate your efforts. I hope it was clear that my comments were directed at the article and not at you personally.

I'm less worried about 3rd parties than most Freepers. Whatever happened in Texas in '92 is irrelevant because President Bush won Texas. I've not looked at the numbers, but I sometimes wonder how many electoral votes Perot really cost President Bush. I'm not sure that all of the Perot voters in states like Ohio were really taken from President Bush. Many of them may have been union guys who would have voted for Clinton if Perot hadn't been in the race. Of course, I'm thankful for the third-party effort in 2000. Without Ralph Nader in the race, we'd be in the third year of the Gore administration. The best we could have hoped for if Nader hadn't run is that some of his people wouldn't have voted or others would have voted for whatever no-name the Greens nominated in his place. I'm certain that without Nader on the ticket, there would have been several thousand more votes for Gore in Florida.

WFTR
Bill

[PhiKapMom]

Six-foot under crowd will probably vote in record numbers in 2004 all for Hillary! Voting fraud will be huge unless every precinct in America has poll watchers -- we new lawyers in the precincts in large cities that can take action immediately to challenge a voter. Especially in Philly where they are bused from precinct to precinct, we need to follow those buses and make sure the same people don't keep voting in different precincts.

I am all for intimidation and let the RATs and NAACP whine to their hearts content! If you don't have something to hide when you go vote, you will be intimidated by something standing there IMHO!

[PhiKapMom]

Great quote and I agree with your theory of moles. End justifies the means in their communist minds!

[cardinal4]

You have freepmail.

[PhiKapMom]

Now for the important things -- Sooner Football -- You mean like Brent Rawls! Don't know if he has his head on straight or not yet but our new Freshman quarterback has been on campus this summer for workouts and hearing good things about him.

Looks like White unless someone steps up! That won't last long with White IMHO.

In the paper today, they were talking about Josh Heupel replacing the Graduate Assistant on Offense that is taking an assistant coaching job. If Josh would be in the job, I wouldn't bet on that highly touted Freshman now getting a chance.

[PhiKapMom]

Thanks for those wonderful pictures tonight! Brightened my evening!