Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: Conned big time "CIA Witness" to White House Lying about Intel story found to be FRAUD
Capitol Hill Blue ^ | July 9, 2003 | Doug Thompson

Posted on 07/09/2003 4:04:00 PM PDT by Doug Thompson

Damn, I hate it when I've been had and I've been had big time.

In 1982, while I was working for Congressman Manuel Lujan of New Mexico, a man came up to a me during a gathering in Albuquerque and introduced himself as Terrance J. Wilkinson. He said he was a security consultant and gave me a business card with his name and just a Los Angeles phone number.

A few weeks later, he called my Washington office and asked to meet for lunch. He seemed to know a lot about the nuclear labs in New Mexico and said he had conducted "security profiles" for both Los Alamos and Sandia National Labs. Lujan served on the committee with oversight on both labs and he offered his services if we ever needed briefings.

We already had nuclear experts on the committee, on loan from the Department of Energy, and we never used Wilkinson for briefings but we kept in touch over the years. He said he had served in Vietnam with Army Special Force, worked for Air America, later for the FBI and as a consultant for the CIA. He said he had helped other Republican members of Congress I called some friends in other GOP offices and they said yes, they knew Terry Wilkinson.

"You can trust him, he's one of the good guys," one chief of staff told me. When I left politics and returned to journalism, Wilkinson became a willing, but always unnamed, source.

Over the last couple of years, Wilkinson served as either a primary or secondary source on a number of stories that have appeared in Capitol Hill Blue regarding intelligence activities. In early stories, I collaborated his information with at least one more source. His information usually proved accurate and, over time, I came to depend on him as a source without additional backup.

On Tuesday, we ran a story headlined "White House admits Bush wrong about Iraqi nukes." For the first time, Wilkinsson said he was willing to go on the record and told a story about being present, as a CIA contract consultant, at two briefings with Bush. He said he was retired now and was fed up and wanted to go public.

"He (Bush) said that if the current operatives working for the CIA couldn't prove the story was true, then the agency had better find some who could," Wilkinson said in our story. "He said he knew the story was true and so would the world after American troops secured the country."

After the story ran, we received a number of emails or phone calls that (1) either claimed Wilkinson was lying or (2) doubted his existence. I quickly dismissed the claims. After all, I had known this guy for 20+ years and had no doubt about his credibility. Some people wanted to talk to him, so I forwarded those requests on to him via email. He didn't answer my emails, which I found odd. I should have listened to a bell that should have been going off in my ear.

Today, a White House source I know and trust said visitor logs don't have any record of anyone named Terrance J. Wilkinson ever being present at a meeting with the President. Then a CIA source I trust said the agency had no record of a contract consultant with that name. "Nobody, and I mean nobody, has ever heard of this guy," my source said.

I tried calling Terry's phone number. I got a recorded message from a wireless phone provider saying the number was no longer in service. I tried a second phone number I had for him. Same result.

Then a friend from the Hill called.

"You've been had," she said. "I know about this guy. He's been around for years, claiming to have been in Special Forces, with the CIA, with NSA. He hasn't worked for any of them and his name is not Terrance Wilkinson."

Both of his phone numbers have Los Angeles area codes but an identity check through Know-X today revealed no record of anyone named Terrance J. Wilkinson ever having lived in LA or surrounding communities.

His email address turns out to be a blind forward to a free email service where anyone can sign up and get an email account. Because it was not one of the usual "free" services like Hotmail, Yahoo or such, I did not recognize it as one (although you'd think that someone like me would have known better).

The bottom line is that someone has been running a con on me for 20 some years and I fell for it like a little old lady in a pigeon drop scheme. I've spent the last two hours going through the database of Capitol Hill Blue stories and removing any that were based on information from Wilkinson (or whoever he is). I've also removed his name, quotes and claims from Tuesday's story about the White House and the uranium claims.

Erasing the stories doesn't erase the fact that we ran articles containing informattion that, given the source, were most likely inaccurate. And it doesn't erase the sad fact that my own arrogance allowed me to be conned.

It will be a long time (and perhaps never) before I trust someone else who comes forward and offers inside information. The next one who does had better be prepared to produce a birth certificate, a driver's license and his grandmother's maiden name.

Any news publication exists on the trust of its readers. Because I depended on a source that was not credible, I violated the trust that the readers of Capitol Hill Blue placed in me.

I was wrong. I am sorry.

© Copyright 2003 by Capitol Hill Blue


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: New Mexico
KEYWORDS: 200307; 20030709; 20yearsofsuckerhood; admiralboorda; afoolandhissources; andstillnonames; apology; batboy; beatitdoug; bush; capitalhillblue; capitolhillbs; ccrm; chb; chrissteele; chump; cia; corn; correction; corrrection; coupplots; davidcorn; debkaneedsdoug; dougthompson; fraud; gocheckcaponesvault; hoax; inaccuracies; iraq; itsalongroadbackdoug; keywordsgohere; laughingstock; leavefrdoug; lies; longwalkshortpier; losalamos; loseyourdayjob; lostcredibility; makesthenytlookgood; marcash; markash; meaculpa; media; mediabias; nosoupforyou; notreadyforprimetime; rankamateurmistake; retraction; ruinedpermanently; salonishiring; sandia; sandianationallab; scoop; steeledossier; suuuuuucker; terrancejwilkinson; terrancewilkinson; thescoopthatwasnt; tookthedougforawalk; truthout; uranium; whosthefraud; wilkerson; wilkinson; wilkinsonsbitch; wmd; yourestilllyingdoug; youvebeenowneddoug
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520521-540541-560 ... 1,321-1,340 next last
To: Doug Thompson
Stop beating yourself up. It happens. No sweat. You had the balls to admit it. That alone sets you head and shoulders above most in your profession.............like the New York Times, for example....................
521 posted on 07/09/2003 10:16:04 PM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
I wasn't " fooled " the first time and I wasn't " fooled " the second.

I think that Doug wasn't " fooled " any time at all. I believe that all of this tooing and froing about some source he's used for 20 years, is just a CYA.

522 posted on 07/09/2003 10:17:25 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 494 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy
The problem is.... Wilkinson is a fraud or doesn't exist, he is either what Doug Thompson says he is or he is like one of those phantom movie critics that only exist in the mind of who quotes him.
523 posted on 07/09/2003 10:17:37 PM PDT by MJY1288 (The truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 517 | View Replies]

To: beckett
Notice that Thompson corroborates Wilkinson's existence by citing anonymous sources at the WH, on the Hill and in the intelligence community. Anonymous sources sure are convenient, ain't they?

Maybe some one at the WH can let us know for sure

524 posted on 07/09/2003 10:20:23 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
Yes, he should; but he won't. He didn't do it the last time either. Doug Thompson is an antiBush basher, who is full of excuses,after some of us here hoist him on his own petard. But, the rest of the world's media, who picks up his garbage and spreads his hatefilled,dishonest,perfidious libel all over, never, NOT EVER, get the sorry CYA story and there are never any retractions, which, if there were any, would wind up being hidden below the obits.
525 posted on 07/09/2003 10:21:26 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 496 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
I wasn't implying that you were fooled... you are much too sharp for that.

I was trying to imply that EVERYONE should wake up, because this doesn't seem to add up to much, other than a writer who is hiding a great deal more than he is admitting. This makes me wonder if the writer is honest when he writes anything.
526 posted on 07/09/2003 10:23:16 PM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife (Lurking since 2000.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 522 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
Only to those who don't remember/ know about his other errors of judgement.
527 posted on 07/09/2003 10:24:03 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 513 | View Replies]

To: harrowup
The detective that's on Clinton's payroll...Terrence Lisner..Linzer????
528 posted on 07/09/2003 10:26:04 PM PDT by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
. Come hell or high water I'm sticking to my guns on this one. The Democrats are NOT going to be allowed to retake control of our government any time soon and that's a fact!

Amen ... Take out the Rats!

529 posted on 07/09/2003 10:28:33 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 471 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
Oh...thanks for the compliment.

No one, NOT A SINGLE PERSON should EVER believe a thing Doug writes. He lies/makes things up and then, when called on it here, he weasels, twists things around, writes a " supposed " apology, which on second look ( if a second one is even needed ), turns out to be a snivling con itself.

All in all, there is far more to this and the rest of Doug's writing, which stinks like rotting flesh mixed with excriment.

530 posted on 07/09/2003 10:30:14 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 526 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
I had specifically complained about this particular gaff.

Other errors get evaluated separately.
531 posted on 07/09/2003 10:30:59 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 527 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
I don't post much, but I had to say that.

The more conservative than thou faction screwed us in California in 1992, with Boxer vs Hertschon, in 1998, with boxer vs Fong,in 2000 with feinstein vs Campbell & in 2002 with Davis vs Simon...

They found the one thing they could hang their disagreement on, & stayed home, giving victory to the RATS.

The really stupid ones think they can hasten some revolution, by forcing us to endure the RATS till we've had enough, whereupon we will rise up, kill the RATS, & hand power over to them!

If they got their wish, & a civil war / revolution was to occur, they themselves would not survive it, because, if they took the field, they would be fired on from all sides or as is much more likely, they would be dragged from their hideyholes, & SHOT by whichever side won!

If you won't stand with us, you stand against us!

532 posted on 07/09/2003 10:32:08 PM PDT by Mike the lurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 514 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
Okay. :-)
533 posted on 07/09/2003 10:32:41 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 531 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
What's the guy's name that wrote the article in the Times?

I'm in the process of moving and I haven't kept up, but my guess is that he's LYING.

Why didn't he come forward the day AFTER the President's State of the Union address???? If he says he KNEW i to be false then, he was derelict in not coming forward sooner.

534 posted on 07/09/2003 10:33:14 PM PDT by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 523 | View Replies]

To: Mike the lurker
BRAVO ! I couldn't have said it better, nor as sucsinctly myself.
535 posted on 07/09/2003 10:34:37 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 532 | View Replies]

To: Doug Thompson
Thank you Doug.
I have always admired your writing talent.

Cindy
536 posted on 07/09/2003 10:35:59 PM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
BUmp for morning.....Just Googled: "T. J. Wilkinson" investigate.

GOt some interesting hits**, but am too tired to follow through.

**Scientist, Iran, professor, lecturer, lots of interesting area. WHat are we hunting for?
537 posted on 07/09/2003 10:36:51 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Prayers for all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 533 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Too bad you can't spell succintly.
538 posted on 07/09/2003 10:38:30 PM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 535 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
That he was CIA.
539 posted on 07/09/2003 10:38:35 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 537 | View Replies]

To: Pegita
Good and logical questions. I believe Thompson won't be able to answer them unless and until he's ready to admit to fabricating this story out of whole cloth.
540 posted on 07/09/2003 10:39:19 PM PDT by AHerald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 489 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520521-540541-560 ... 1,321-1,340 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson