Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"GET THE CLINTONS OFF THE STAGE" COUP AT DNC CONTINUES...
7.7.03 | Mia T

Posted on 07/07/2003 2:28:11 AM PDT by Mia T

DEAN WANTS TO CLEAN: WANTS MCAULIFFE OUT AT DNC, SAY SOURCES

Sources close to the early-Democratic frontrunner reveal how Dean has bitterly complained about McAuliffe and the lackluster job he has done for the party.

"We'll make a change there immediately [after the New Hampshire primary]," a top Dean source said of the DNC leadership. "I think it is important, as does Howard, to make a new beginning, cut ties from the past."

--H. Dean via aide via Drudge, 7.6.03


THE INTERMINABLE clintons
(It's time to take out the trash... A Senate en passant capture is THE MOVE...)
"GET THE CLINTONS OFF THE STAGE" COUP AT DNC CONTINUES...

by Mia T, 7.7.03

The clintons have clearly arrogated the Democratic party in perpetuity.
One has to wonder if the Ds will tolerate the clintons much longer....
We are starting to see cracks of the Susan Estrich-"hillary clinton can never be president"- expediency variety
....Mia T, 6.25.03

missus clinton's Cover Lies and the Howard Dean Syndrome

Mia T, 6.25.03



 

The clinton Complex-Question Fallacy Scheme notwithstanding, it is axiomatic and confirmed on a daily basis by clinton "infrastructure" strategy, itself, that hillary ("listening tour" / cozy-clintonoid-interviews-of-the-Colmes-kind) clinton is no better than Howard Dean at withstanding media scrutiny... and is likely significantly worse.

From this it follows--if one also notices that media genuflection before the altar of clinton is no longer de rigueur--that hillary clinton cannot survive the standard, lengthy, probing presidential-campaign process. An end run is her only option.

And contrary to conventional wisdom, time is not on her side. Not only are the clintons in general decline, but in this post-9/11 world, demographics favorable to liberals projected for 2008 will not resuscitate disfavored, dysfunctional, dangerous demagogues like the clintons.

Look, therefore, for the clintons to make their move in '04. Susan Estrich, Al From and The Times aren't on the same "Get the clintons off the stage!" page for no reason.

 




eyes wide shut

When Alex kills a woman during a rape, Alex is sent to prison.
When clinton rapes women, girls, his country and God knows what else. . .
and kills? --- check out those fourscore-plus deaths, please!
And don't forget the wag-the-dog, desperately-seeking-a-legacy bombings,
or the cold-blooded Ricky Ray Rector execution---
not clinton but society is imprisoned,
imprisoned in clinton's
besmirched, semen-stained, feckless presidency.

A risible and repulsive result;
yet not even the punch line.

While Alex is conditioned in prison with aversion therapy,
transmuted into a moral robot who becomes nauseated
by the mere thought of sex and violence,
bill clinton and his Thought Police,
in a perverse reverse aversion,
have conditioned society's collective brain
into not mere acquiescence but twisted admiration.

In the end,
if clinton's arrogant, ruthless, reckless nature is restored to him,
it seems the joke will be on all of us,
for it will be a victory for infinite victimhood and irresponsibility,
for seduction, for violence, for nihilism, for anarchy.

We will have set apart clinton as the hero
by making his victims less human than he;
we will have allowed clinton to carefully estrange us from his victims
so that we can enjoy the rapes and the beatings
as much as clinton himself does.

Mia T, A CLOCKWORK ORANGE


 


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: Arkansas; US: Illinois; US: New York; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: clinton911; clintoncorruption; clintonfailure; clintonineptitude; clintons911; clintonstooge; howarddean; mcauliffe; theterrorismstupid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
 
Democratic Party's Problem Transcends Its Anti-War Contingent


Mia T, 5.5.03

 

hyperlinked images of shame
copyright Mia T 2003.

by Mia T, 4.6.03

 

If Act I was a thinly veiled allegory about naked clintonism, then Act II is a parable about the plan for world domination by the Establishment, aged hippies in pinstripes all, with their infantile, solipsistic world view amazingly untouched by time.

 

Mia T, THE ALIENS

 

Al From is sounding the alarm. "Unless we convince Americans that Democrats are strong on national security," he warns his party, "Democrats will continue to lose elections."

Helloooo? That the Democrats have to be spoon-fed what should be axiomatic post-9/11 is, in and of itself, incontrovertible proof that From's advice is insufficient to solve their problem.

From's failure to fully lay out the nature of the Democrats' problem is not surprising: he is the guy who helped seal his party's fate. It was his Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) that institutionalized the proximate cause of the problem, clintonism, and legitimized its two eponymic provincial operators on the national stage. The "Third Way" and "triangulation" don't come from the same Latin root for no reason.

That "convince" is From's operative word underscores the Democrats' dilemma. Nine-eleven was transformative. It is no longer sufficient merely to convince. One must demonstrate, demonstrate convincingly, if you will… which means both in real time and historically.

When it comes to national security, Americans will no longer take any chances. Turning the turn of phrase back on itself, the era of the Placebo President is over. (Incidentally, the oft-quote out-of-context sentence fragment alluded to here transformed meaningless clinton triangulation into a meaningful if deceptive soundbite.)

Although From is loath to admit it -- the terror in his eyes belies his facile solution -- the Democratic party's problem transcends its anti-war contingent.

With a philosophy that relinquishes our national sovereignty -- and relinquishes it reflexively… and to the UN no less -- the Democratic party is, by definition, the party of national insecurity.

With policy ruled by pathologic self-interest -- witness the "Lieberman Paradigm," Kerry's "regime change" bon mot (gone bad), Edwards' and the clintons' brazen echoes thereof (or, alternatively, Pelosi's less strident wartime non-putdown putdown)… and, of course, the clincher -- eight years of the clintons' infantilism, grotesquerie and utter failure -- the Democratic party is, historically and in real time, the party of national insecurity.

The Democrats used to be able to wallpaper their national insecurity with dollars and demogoguery. But that was before 9/11.

The REAL "Living History" -- clintoplasmodial slime


Q ERTY8
Democratic Party's Problem Transcends Its Anti-War Contingent
missus clinton's REAL virtual office updateBUMP!

1 posted on 07/07/2003 2:28:12 AM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mia T

"Stop worrying. We STILL have the stolen FBI files to use, as before.
We have them forever and without any problem."

2 posted on 07/07/2003 2:34:30 AM PDT by Diogenesis (If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
"We'll make a change there immediately [after the New Hampshire primary]," a top Dean source said of the DNC leadership.

Somebody ought to chisel this on the “sorces” headstone because he's whistling in a graveyard.

The Clintons want Dean to cancel out Kerry for the socialist/progressive vote and that's it.

Should he pick a fight with the McAullife/Clinton gang, his “life” stock will suffer a tremendous hit.

3 posted on 07/07/2003 2:55:26 AM PDT by johnny7 (... 'scuse me, I gotta puke.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
True...but the thing is, the underlying catalyst for all politicos is power; clinton blackmail will work only if Ds can maintain/regain power...

But the Ds are quickly realizing that
(1) the "clinton" brand is poison for them individually and for the party
(2) the clintons want it all for themselves
4 posted on 07/07/2003 2:59:59 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth; Gail Wynand; looscannon; Lonesome in Massachussets; Freedom'sWorthIt; IVote2; ...
Q ERTY8
THE CLINTON RAPES, LIVING HISTORY, USEFUL IDIOTS AND ENTROPY
Democratic Party's Problem Transcends Its Anti-War Contingent
missus clinton's REAL virtual office updatePING!
5 posted on 07/07/2003 3:14:51 AM PDT by Mia T (SCUM (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Good morning Mia

I think the dems were sick of the clintons long ago. They're in between a rock and a hard place though. With no good dem candidates to run, at least the clintons can grab attention. (even if it's for all the wrong reasons) To have to be associated with them must hurt though...

I just can't take anyone seriously that "buddies" up with the clintons, no matter how many times they wash their hands...
6 posted on 07/07/2003 4:03:48 AM PDT by firewalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
I am convinced that their contacts in the FBI continue to feed the grifters with information they use on anyone who would disagree with them.

Nothing else can explain Al D'Amato's near hysterical recent defense of mrs.grifter.

No doubt they quietly lean on others and that includes Senator Sheets Byrd.

7 posted on 07/07/2003 4:39:32 AM PDT by OldFriend ((BUSH/CHENEY 2004))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: TonyRo76
You underestimate their capacity for ruthless, EVIL, actions against any and all who would bring them down.
9 posted on 07/07/2003 5:04:09 AM PDT by OldFriend ((BUSH/CHENEY 2004))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
I would not be getting on any turbo-props with Mr. Dean, knowing the Clinton ilk.
10 posted on 07/07/2003 5:05:55 AM PDT by Dirk McQuickly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: TonyRo76
The grifters have too many compatriots in and out of government and in the media to ever face the consequences for their evil ways. There are those who continue to adore them no matter what the crime.
12 posted on 07/07/2003 5:22:39 AM PDT by OldFriend ((BUSH/CHENEY 2004))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: TonyRo76
When I think of the party these days, I think Sharpton, Braun, Kook-in-itch, and JERRY SPRINGER.
15 posted on 07/07/2003 5:42:23 AM PDT by OldFriend ((BUSH/CHENEY 2004))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: Mia T
You know, this is a tough thing to contemplate. Imagine you were a Royal in a far away kingdom and an evil King made war on you in your principal city with an army of cockroaches & rats. Which strategic goal would you prefer:

1) The singular death of the rat king and, thus, the failure of his leaderless army. However, the vermin would continue to infest your city.

OR...

2) The complete annihilation of the verminous army that gnaws, bites and despoils your city while spreading disease and terror? This route leaves the evil King free to plot for another day.

As much as I despise the Clintons, it DOES seem that that retribution, legal and otherwise, should be a methodically staged progression that allows time for the maximum killing power of the Clinton poison to suffuse the Democratic Party.

To be sure, there are eggs laid in every dark crevice they inhabit and some of these would be missed no matter what the curative.

I would also suspect that the kind of corruption the Clintons breath is part and parcel of their utilitarian Marxist philosophy so the disease will continue to arise as long as the Democrats water at that hole. Shedding the Clintons would simply be culling a few sick animals from an infected herd.

Hmmm. What to do?

17 posted on 07/07/2003 6:30:43 AM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (Defund NPR, PBS and the LSC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
dean against mcawful. How can WE lose? This fight is a win win for us. dean wins, we win mcawful wins, deans anti America scum stays home or; better votes green.
18 posted on 07/07/2003 6:36:38 AM PDT by jmaroneps37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TonyRo76
I try to mention this wonderful development in every casual conversation. Most folks are in disbelief at the thought of Jerry Springer running for senate.
19 posted on 07/07/2003 6:41:29 AM PDT by OldFriend ((BUSH/CHENEY 2004))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson