Replies

You know, this is a tough thing to contemplate. Imagine you were a Royal in a far away kingdom and an evil King made war on you in your principal city with an army of cockroaches & rats. Which strategic goal would you prefer:

1) The singular death of the rat king and, thus, the failure of his leaderless army. However, the vermin would continue to infest your city.

OR...

2) The complete annihilation of the verminous army that gnaws, bites and despoils your city while spreading disease and terror? This route leaves the evil King free to plot for another day.

As much as I despise the Clintons, it DOES seem that that retribution, legal and otherwise, should be a methodically staged progression that allows time for the maximum killing power of the Clinton poison to suffuse the Democratic Party.

To be sure, there are eggs laid in every dark crevice they inhabit and some of these would be missed no matter what the curative.

I would also suspect that the kind of corruption the Clintons breath is part and parcel of their utilitarian Marxist philosophy so the disease will continue to arise as long as the Democrats water at that hole. Shedding the Clintons would simply be culling a few sick animals from an infected herd.

Hmmm. What to do?