Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Develops Urban Surveillance System
Associated Press ^ | Jul 01, 2003 | MICHAEL J. SNIFFEN

Posted on 07/01/2003 12:34:34 PM PDT by optimistically_conservative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-185 next last
To: spodefly
My friend, a person would have categorized and filed you GEEK after Day 6.

What's funny is it is the silicon based, electronic intelligence that never tires of cataloging such repitition.


"It is inevitable."

61 posted on 07/01/2003 4:32:25 PM PDT by optimistically_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: optimistically_conservative

"As you can see, we have been keeping our eyes on you for some time now, Mr. Spodefly. And frankly, we are bored $hitless."
62 posted on 07/01/2003 4:38:25 PM PDT by spodefly (This is my tagline. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: spodefly

"Well, at least you're cute..."
63 posted on 07/01/2003 5:00:30 PM PDT by optimistically_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Dr Warmoose
"More likely to be used by divorce attorneys, targeted investigations on political enemies, the ever expanding War On Drugs, traffic violators, and any other subject where the government could find a return on its investment in terms of cash and control."

Of course - a very astute observation.
64 posted on 07/01/2003 5:16:36 PM PDT by M. Peach (eschew obsfucation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: optimistically_conservative
With such a system in place, everyone who visits a gun store or shooting range could be automatically registered as a known gun owner (even if they are only browsing in the store or shooting with a friend's guns), thus bringing about a rapid and nearly complete nationwide gun owner registration without having to get anyone to fill out any forms.
65 posted on 07/01/2003 5:19:22 PM PDT by Korth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr Warmoose
I like what you say - intelligent minds think alike -

"What happens when there is the likely public/private cooperation in that some private company fronts the money to install these cameras, look for "crimes" then sends you fines and does this all on a commission? "

Did you know that here in the Palm Springs area the cameras at traffic lights who give tickets to speeders are privately owned and they receive a percentage of the fines they generate?
66 posted on 07/01/2003 5:21:33 PM PDT by M. Peach (eschew obsfucation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

Comment #67 Removed by Moderator

Comment #68 Removed by Moderator

Comment #69 Removed by Moderator

To: Dr Warmoose
I find the loss of our freedom and liberties inevitible. The more terrorists attack us - the more liberties we will lose in the name of security. Every time we plug a loophole - another one opens somewhere else by terrorists or "enemies of the state" until we are totally monitored - 24/7.

My opinon is that two situations are inevitable. Either someone or some country destroys everything living or human on earth - or governments will have total control and authority over all of us.

What is your opinion?
70 posted on 07/01/2003 5:32:46 PM PDT by M. Peach (eschew obsfucation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: appalachian_dweller
Lincoln proved that the 10th means what the federal government says.
71 posted on 07/01/2003 5:42:48 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: kkindt
I like your post and agree with you, with the exception of cameras (e.g. SafeLight) "protecting" us against speeders. These cameras are about revenue enhancement *only*.

Why else would there be no marks against your insurance or license?
72 posted on 07/01/2003 6:24:57 PM PDT by clyde asbury (Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Gunslingr3
the average Londoner is thought to be photographed 300 times a day.

This makes my skin crawl.

73 posted on 07/01/2003 6:44:41 PM PDT by Jonathon Spectre (Nazis believed they were doing good. Even they didn't take 300 photos a day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoulStorms
Goodness, SoulStorms, that seems almost like a... pattern...
74 posted on 07/01/2003 6:48:17 PM PDT by Jonathon Spectre (Nazis believed they were doing good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: optimistically_conservative
That See (CTS) technology isn't intended for homeland security or law enforcement and couldn't be used for "other applications without extensive modifications."

Sure. That's what they said about national gun owner databases, too.

The typical snotty responses that I see by the cops/govt. on this subject are usually:
1) 'We'll only use it against the bad guys with proper probable cause, trust me!!'

2) 'If you've done nothing wrong, you have nothing to fear.'

75 posted on 07/01/2003 7:24:05 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (No animals were harmed during the making of this post.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: optimistically_conservative
If you think that contractors are not drooling over the stupendous govt. contracts that they could get using this technology, I've got a bridge to sell you.
76 posted on 07/01/2003 7:26:23 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (No animals were harmed during the making of this post.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kkindt
You know, there is a company that has prodcued a chip that can be inserted into you, and track you with a unique serial number. Why don't you go ahead and have it done. It woudl be a nice, warm, snuggly blanket that will make you feel safe and secure as the government takes care of your every need.
77 posted on 07/01/2003 7:36:11 PM PDT by Tench_Coxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: optimistically_conservative
But spending money to put criminals in jail for long periods of time is out of the question, I suppose.
78 posted on 07/01/2003 8:14:46 PM PDT by P.O.E.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird
Maybe they can use the X-Ray cameras Congressman Mica wants to use at airports; that way they can let us know which citizens need to go on a diet or get liposuction.
79 posted on 07/01/2003 8:19:51 PM PDT by DLfromthedesert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
You could surround the perimeter of a city and catch stolen vehicles leaving, parole violations, etc. without tracking everyone.

How neat, you could get one last picture of your truck as it leaves the city for the chop block. Since the police do not prosicute the crimes now, having pictures will not help.

And this from a government that is allowing the use of public lands for mosques and building a Palestinian State. Somehow I do not trust the hands that fleece us.

80 posted on 07/01/2003 8:27:21 PM PDT by American in Israel (right beats wrong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-185 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson