S.F. gay pride parade mixes zaniness, seriousness, victories

That ambiguous question cannot be answered by one individual.

What does marriage mean to you? What is so important to you for you to marry the man that you are having anal sex with this week when another one will be along any day now.

I had to post a SOURCE to confirm that many states had antimiscegenation laws!! I mean DUH that is history 101! I mean come-on!

Boy are you dumb. Nobody disagreed that there were such laws. You referred to the entire "South" and one poster asked you to be more specific.

Or that I had to talk about the fact that a sequenced genome doesnt mean that even a significant number of gene functions have been elucidated!

Again, this is an indiotic revision. You spoke with certainty of a genetic basis for homosexuality. None has been proven. None ever will be. You brought the human genome project in a some sort of proof of your theory, and then you admitted the the genome project tells us very little. What was your point?

And finally, you seem to be awefully "obsessed" with the anus...presumably from the "sodomy" issue (which has been asserted here is only anal sex between gay men, and only gay men perform anal sex. I *urge* you to read the definition of sodomy in the Georgia statute (which, of course, I had to provide) that Georgia itself overturned (SCOTUS upheld). And a quick search on the net will prove to you that anal sex is alive and well (and very popular) with the male hetero population. If you think only gay men perform anal sex, again your head is really deep in the sand.

I'm glad the buttsex crowd has fools like you sticking up for them. We may eradicate this mental illness yet. I have never discussed the Georgia ruling on this forum. I have talked about the Texas ruling, which was specific to homosexual relations. But that is irrelevant.

Waht I am especially interested here is the idea that because there is heterosexual anal pornography on the net, the practice is very popular. It is not. One can also find pornography involving amputees, obese women and hermaphrodites. All are perversions practiced by the souless. Do some heterosexual man have anal sex with women? Occasionally, I guess. But simple logic tells us that this act is not preferrable to the woman, so it is less common. On the other hand, it is the highlight of any gay session. If you do not understand that anal sex is primarily a gay sport, then you are just stupid. I don't know what else to tell you.

Do us all a favor an go ask your boyfriend what a valid point is before you decide to post again.

So now gay men make up <2% of the population? Earlier on this thread a conservative poster used the 5% figure. What happened in the last 24 hours that the population of gays was more than halved?

Well they are killing themselves off fast, but not that fast. The buttsex crowd would have us believe they make up 10% of the population. It is really less than 2%. And a man abusing a little boy is a gay pedophile. No two ways about it.

Well LOL my girlfriend would be angry if I decided to date a guy! What's your girlfriend's name? Steve? Not a chance are you straight.

What marriage means to me, however, is my own business. But I do not think that one group of people with strong religious convictions should force their specific biblical views on everyone else, esp. when those views endlessly *inconsistent* - and in a country dedicated to separation of church

Until you tell us why two men would get married you will never sound very convincing asserting that they have the "right" to get married. They don't. They need psychiatic attention.

Riiight. That is that religious organization's definition. I am more logical. No man is going to molest a little boy unless he has some gay tendencies. This is very simple logic.

Well, if a man falls in love with another man, they should be able to get married and enjoy the plethora of benefits of marriage conferred by the state, just as a man and a woman can. Equal protection under the law, just as the constitution demands.

Equal protection of what? Homosexuals are looking for marriage so that society will somehow finally embrace their deviant behavior. It won't. Civil marriage is about family. Such a concept is alien to the self-obsessed homosexual world. Thus a man marrying a man is no different from a man marrying a dog. I am not married, and I am not gay. Does equal protection mean that my dog deserves the smae health benefits as your boyfriend? I love him as much, and I am not likely to get rid of him in a month.

And JEEZ here I have to do some teaching again!! As you *should* know after any graduate psychiatry course, homosexuals are not in need of any "attention" as DSM4 was changed. I have to teach you guys about law (existence of anti-miscegenation laws), medicine (DSM, HIV, hepatitis), and basic science (genes, proteomics)! Sheesh!

Please don't try to teach me anything. You are too screwed up yourself. And it really does not look like you taught anyone else, either.

I went back and checked the thread:

Nobody deneied the existence of anti-miscegenation laws. You made that up.</>

Nobody disageed with you on genes. You made an invalid point and then clumsily backtracked.

Nobody disagreed with you on medecine. You chose to defend a nasty, self-destructive lifestyle choice.

I'm sure you'd love to have us all believe that you are some adamant heterosexual buttsex crusader. But the fact that you signed up yesterday, and are so vocal about your endorsement of homosexuality, and you that you are so wrong on every point you make is clear eveidence that you are a gay rabble-rouser. No matter. I enjoy exposing you for the ignorant shirtlifter that you are.

It's really kind of sad that you are so naive that you do not understand that you are being manipulated by the gay rights lobby. Oh well, I guess that's how some guy talked you into letting him violate your cornhole in the first place, right? Again, I urge you to take some psychiatry/behavioral classes. Pedophilia isnt about typical sexual attractions or desires, refer to the links I provided.

Interesting that one of the sites you provided was clearly backed by the gay rights lobby, and that you clearly did not even bother to read it yourself.

I have a psychology degree myself, and I think the entire idea that rape is always about "social domination" is liberal PC nonsense. In any case, Psychiatry is a bull-sh!tting contest. None of it can be proved. Men molest little boys because they like little boys. That is homosexual behavior no matter how hard the apologists wish it were otherwise.

I wonder what NAMGLA's position is on all of this... Oh wait...

There are not 40 states in the South and Midwest. You were not asked for proof. You were asked to specify the states because "the South" is a big place.

That's as far as I got. Please remove the gerbil and re-edit your post and re-post it. Right now it is too confusing to respond to.

Hint: Before you post you can view it so it does not come out as one long piece and it is impossible to tell where your comments end and mine begin.

This post is beyond idiotic. It points to Homosexual as well as heterosexual pornography. Therefore, it specifically refutes your point. No way you ever went to law school. If you did, you would have starved to death long ago making mistakes like that.

Hmmmm... Where to begin on your latest moronic rambling...

I find it hard to comprehend why someone would be so consistently wrong, have the errors pushed in his face, and continue to call attention to himself. It is this type of thinking that leads one to embrace homsexuality.

In other words, the respondent didn't even know the south had these laws! Shocking! THIS IS COMMON KNOWLEDGE YET I WAS ASKED TO FIND A SOURCE!!

The person asked you wether you were talking about the "whole south," or just part of it. He never asked for confirmation that the laws existed as you keep trying to inject into this discussion. NEVER. DIDN'T happen. Are you familiar with the term "straw man?"

Next you addressed the genetics issue. Again:

Nobody disageed with you on genes. You made an invalid point and then clumsily backtracked.

How do you address that point? By backtracking of course! The issue is your (and the rest of the homosexual "community's") suicide-pact dependence on the idea that homosexuality is innate. All of you state this theory as fact, but there's one problem: It is not fact, and even if it were it is unprovable due to limitations you yourself pointed out. If I were in a boxing match with you, I honestly believe you would keep hitting yourself.

I would call you on your use of statements made by people other than myself in a disagreement solely between you and me, but this is probably beyond your comprehension. You know you are wrong on this point so you try to change the subject change the argument. This is called backtracking. For the record: Homosexuality is both learned behavior and a conscious choice. I don't know who said what and I am not about to read 150 posts to find out. This is simple intuitive logic, but possibly beyond your limited comprehension.

God I hate when humiliated people who can't think logically start trying to hide their stupidity on one of these threads. Guys like you start throwing everything at the wall to see if anything will stick. Which is why you have tried to defend yourself on every point. Even the ones where you are so clearly wrong that disagreement is idiotic

...but here we go, right? No one made the "incorrect statement that more fags have AIDS." You made that up. Homosexuals are responsible for the intital rapid transition of AIDs into the general population. This is accepted medical science. Look into it.

Then... I love this one... You argued about the timing of your joining our little community: "It wasn't yesterday, it was two days ago -so there!!! Neener-neener!!!" Whatever. You are clearly so agitated about Conservatives refusing to embrace the filthy buttsex community that you took it upon your self to sign up here and appoint yourself champion of gayness. Heterosexuals don't do that. Why don't you go back to DU where everyone celebrates buttsex. I'm sure you'd be much happier there.

When you get to that "other thread" where people understand science, be sure to get them to explain a few things to you. You sorely need it.

Ramon, I thought you were "off to another thread." That's the problem with you fags. Everything's a drama with you. A word of advice, girlfriend: When you leave in a huff, stay gone. On to your points: You are again inventing arguements because you you can't counter facts. I don't know what they taught you at those correspondence schools you claim to have attended, but I rejected the pro-homosexual studies of the APS a long time ago. I am a man and I do real work for a living. Psychology is a cult devoted to telling confused deviants that their behavior is not their fault. As such, godless homosexuals embrace it as "proof" that their behavior is "normal." It isn't.

Your post is further proof that there is no chance in Hell that you studied psychology or much else. Tell the truth: Did you really go to Clown College? A Psych degree requires intensive study of statistics. Had you studied it, you would be quick to realize that if 1 person in a hundred is a gay man (again very simple and verifiable statistics) there would be very little gay pedophilia and gay child pornography. There is plenty. Homosexuality leads to a breakdown of societal morality, and stupid people like you are its enablers. Now follow your own proclamation and STAY GONE faggot.