Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

S.F. gay pride parade mixes zaniness, seriousness, victories
SF Chronicle ^ | Monday, June 30, 2003 | Reynolds Holding

Posted on 06/30/2003 11:06:36 AM PDT by presidio9

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:42:52 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-162 next last
To: presidio9
Butt Pirates of the Barbary Coast.
121 posted on 07/01/2003 2:06:55 PM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #122 Removed by Moderator

To: obmot
heteros who want "preteen girls" and those websites do major megabucks business.

You seem to know a lot about this, been doing much "basic research"?

Seriously, as a newbie, you can do better than to make general accusations against heterosexuals. I don't know and don't care whether more homos or heteros are pedophiles, I know it's disgusting in either case and I don't like being tarred with your broad brush.

123 posted on 07/01/2003 2:19:34 PM PDT by palmer (Lazamataz for Supreme Ruler!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: obmot
Your study group is invalid, as it does not reflect the overall population of NYC, much less the nation at large.
As for the spread of STDs in other countries (SEA and S-SA),
this is population control, and you cannot say that the gays within that population are enjoying a higher survival rate.
Your claim that there is a increase in the homosexual population is also invalid. There has been an increase in the openly gay population but I contened that that segment has always been there but due to pressure has been supressed and has even to some extent reproduced for what ever reason. With the gay "revolution" the pressure to reproduce will be reduced (ie engage in a "normal " marriage/kids ) and due to the already risky nature of the lifestlye as a whole the population as a genome will begin a slow decline.
You are foolish, you think only in the term of a few years or decades. The homosexuals have won what at best is a Phyrric victory. I'm thinking in terms of generations, which is how one must think when confronting the pervasive undercurrent that is the homosexual "lifestyle".
I'm patient, and I'll pass that along to my kids, which is something you will never do.
So, See Ya..
124 posted on 07/01/2003 2:19:38 PM PDT by cavtrooper21 ("..he's not heavy, sir. He's my brother...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: obmot
Hey troll, where did you go???
125 posted on 07/01/2003 3:59:16 PM PDT by cavtrooper21 ("..he's not heavy, sir. He's my brother...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

Comment #126 Removed by Moderator

Comment #127 Removed by Moderator

To: obmot
What is your theory on homosexuality?
You switch from genetic predisposition to free choice with the ease of a drag queen changing wigs.
Like a typical liberal you use what ever suits you to justify your position.
I've made up my mind, you are all genetic losers that will become less of a factor with the more freedom you get. I'll never live to see my theory bear fruit, but if you play out the numbers that can be applied to the genome model, you are goners.
The "theory" that gays are made, not born is crap. The gays that I have met all agree that they "knew" at a very early age,(both male and female)and were aware that they were "different" although two said it took them many years to figure it out.
Before I close out, I want you to understand one thing VERY clearly. I'm not a homophobe, I just object to some of the gay communities public flaunting of some their more nasty habits.
What two consenting adults do in the privacy of the bedroom is (and should always be) their own business. I treat people as they treat me, but there are folks in the gay community who attempt to push their lifestyle in my face, and this irritates me. This shows a real lack of respect, and like they say.. "if you want people to respect you, you must in turn show others that same respect."
I have a feeling that you don't really care if anyone respects you, and that shows that you don't even respect yourself.
'night
128 posted on 07/01/2003 7:52:10 PM PDT by cavtrooper21 ("..he's not heavy, sir. He's my brother...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: obmot
Yes, exactly!!! The point is heteros shouldnt make broad brush generalizations, nor should gays. And believe me, there are a LOT of "non-newbies" here making awefully broad generalizations.

Great, let's start with you. If you make claims about heteros throwing big bucks at underage porn, you should back that up with a credible source or shut up. Just because a few people here generalize between gays and pedophilia doesn't make it ok for you to make stuff up.

129 posted on 07/01/2003 8:36:47 PM PDT by palmer (Lazamataz for Supreme Ruler!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: obmot
Again, for your own enlightenment, I recommend that you take some basic genetics courses - particulary in functional genomics (maybe throw in a splash of proteomics too) since you dont seem to have a firm grasp on how genes work and how their functions are elucidated.

To obmot: You lack the intelligence to convincingly assume such a pedantic tone

To all: Ever notice that homosexuals seem to believe that they are smarter than everyone else? Why is that? Part of the reason why they are so unpopular is their constant condescending behavior. And yet, they are the ones who have not yet figure out that the anus is an exit, not an entrance.

Back to obmot: Your rambling post was long, but it made no valid point. Until science determines a genetic basis for homosexuality, it must be assumed to be learned behavior. This learned behavior is reinforced through habitual practice. Talk to someone who has been cured of his homosexuality (there are many MANY more than you think), and you will start to realize that the gay community has other dirty secrets besides the need for a shower and plenty of lava soap after intercourse.

And your lame pseudo-scientific points don't do anything to counter those facts. We know that blue-eyed moms and pops have blue eyed kids. We DO NOT know that gayness runs in families. I agree that the homosexuals are desperately hoping to find a genetic basis for their nasty behavior -as if that will exhonerate them. But homosexuals are their own worst enemy. As long as you continue to claim "we are just like you -only we have constant anal sex with eachother," you will never be able to point to a trait common to homosexuality, and, thus, a genetic basis.

130 posted on 07/02/2003 6:28:00 AM PDT by presidio9 (Homophobic and Proud!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: obmot
Yes, exactly!!! The point is heteros shouldnt make broad brush generalizations, nor should gays. And believe me, there are a LOT of "non-newbies" here making awefully broad generalizations.

It is you who are making broad generalizations. Any idiot with a 4th grade education can do the math and figure out that homosexuals are much MUCH more likely to pracitce all kinds of deviant sexual behavior. Especially pedophilia.

131 posted on 07/02/2003 6:38:41 AM PDT by presidio9 (Homophobic and Proud!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: obmot
Well patience is a good thing; gays have been around at least since the roman empire, so your prediction that the "gay line" will expire within the next few generations is unlikely since this hasnt happened in at least 2,000 years.

Exactly, because it is a learned behavior. When society becomes more tolerant of homosexuality, its practice increases until that society becomes disgusted with itself (or God does) and cracks down on the behavior. This story has been repeated for a lot longer than 2000 years.

132 posted on 07/02/2003 6:41:50 AM PDT by presidio9 (Homophobic and Proud!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: obmot
Not suprisinly, you still have not answered the question. What, exactly is the civil reason for marriage?
133 posted on 07/02/2003 6:45:08 AM PDT by presidio9 (Homophobic and Proud!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

Comment #134 Removed by Moderator

Comment #135 Removed by Moderator

Comment #136 Removed by Moderator

Comment #137 Removed by Moderator

Comment #138 Removed by Moderator

To: obmot
No, LOL, that statement certainly wasnt an unsubstantiated generalization!

We've addressed this, but if you feel the need to make a fool of yourself, I will repeat the point. Roughly the same number of little boys as girls is sexually abused in this country. Homosexuals make up less than 2% of the male population. Again, do the math.

139 posted on 07/02/2003 11:15:02 AM PDT by presidio9 (RUN AL, RUN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: obmot
Since when are learned behavior and "a concious choice" mutually exclusive Einstein? What do you think other destructive behaviors like drug abuse are?

Have you ever had someone say "good point" to you? I didn't think so.
140 posted on 07/02/2003 11:17:30 AM PDT by presidio9 (RUN AL, RUN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-162 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson