clinton's non-endorsement endorsement of Wesley Clark WHAZZUP?

AP | 6.30.03 | Mia T

[Mia T]

clinton's non-endorsement endorsement of Wesley Clark
WHAZZUP?

by Mia T, 6.30.03

"While I cannot take sides in the Democratic primary, I believe Wes, if he runs, would make a valuable contribution because he understands America's security challenges and domestic priorities," Clinton said. "I believe he would make a good president."

Clinton: Clark Would Make Good President
AP ^ | 06/29/03 | JAMES JEFFERSON

The impeached ex-ersatz prez "it was the terrorism, stupid" utter failure should know what it takes, eh?

So exactly what is the co-rapist couple up to now with this non-endorsement endorsement of fellow inept provincial operator, Wesley Clark?

Just the same ol' same ol'....
Undermining the competition as they arrogate for themselves....

missus clinton's Cover Lies and the Howard Dean Syndrome
(Look for the clintons to make their move in '04) 

The Democratic Party's Problem Transcends Its Anti-War Contingent
Q ERTY8^BUMP

Thou art arm'd that hath thy crook'd schemers straight.
Cudgel thy brains no more, the clinton plots are great.

Mia T, On Neutered and Neutering
by Mia T and Edward Zehr (EZ)

missus clinton's Cover Lies and the Howard Dean Syndrome

Mia T, 6.25.03

 

The clinton Complex-Question Fallacy Scheme notwithstanding, it is axiomatic and confirmed on a daily basis by clinton "infrastructure" strategy, itself, that hillary ("listening tour" / cozy-clintonoid-interviews-of-the-Colmes-kind) clinton is no better than Howard Dean at withstanding media scrutiny... and is likely significantly worse.

From this it follows--if one also notices that media genuflection before the altar of clinton is no longer de rigueur--that hillary clinton cannot survive the standard, lengthy, probing presidential-campaign process. An end run is her only option.

And contrary to conventional wisdom, time is not on her side. Not only are the clintons in general decline, but in this post-9/11 world, demographics favorable to liberals projected for 2008 will not resuscitate disfavored, dysfunctional, dangerous demagogues like the clintons.

Look, therefore, for the clintons to make their move in '04. Susan Estrich, Al From and The Times aren't on the same "Get the clintons off the stage!" page for no reason.

 

CNN's favorite general, Wesley Clark, has also been heard to opine that our troops are getting bogged down in Iraq. His competence to judge American generals is questionable since his command was limited to working for NATO. We prefer to hear from American generals. Clark's contribution to international relations consisted of mistakenly bombing the Chinese embassy in Belgrade. In his zeal to prevent troop casualties, he ordered pilots to fly at such high altitudes that the pilots complained that they were being forced to incur unnecessary civilian casualties.

The enemy within

 

hear

*Thanx to Cloud William for text and audio

 

LEHRER: President Bush, your closing statement, sir.

PRESIDENT BUSH: Three weeks from now--two weeks from tomorrow, America goes to the polls and you're going to have to decide who you want to lead this country ...

On foreign affairs, some think it's irrelevant. I believe it's not. We're living in an interconnected world...And if a crisis comes up, ask who has the judgment and the experience and, yes, the character to make the right decision?

And, lastly, the other night on character Governor Clinton said it's not the character of the president but the character of the presidency. I couldn't disagree more. Horace Greeley said the only thing that endures is character. And I think it was Justice Black who talked about great nations, like great men, must keep their word.

And so the question is, who will safeguard this nation, who will safeguard our people and our children? I need your support, I ask for your support. And may God bless the United States of America.

(Applause)

play tape

 

THE CLINTONS--AMERICA'S BIGGEST BLUNDER
Hear Bush 41 Warn Us--October 19, 1992*

[Mia T]

THE CLINTON RAPES, LIVING HISTORY, USEFUL IDIOTS AND ENTROPY
Q ERTY6

PING!

[YaYa123]

Won't you please start a thread with only two things on it. Just Hillary's morphing Book Cover, and sax playing Bill superimposed over the twin towers. Genius, I tell you, genius!

And I think Clinton is praising Wesley Clark as someone's VP. Sitting Senators almost never win the presidency, so it's unimaginable the Democrats would run 2 senators on the same ticket. Clark fills the second slot and geographically matches well with any of those northeastern candidates. Clinton is playing the Arkansas card when he pushes for Clark, throwin a bone to the home boys, and it would add some military clout to the ticket.

[Helms]

clinton's non-endorsement endorsement of Wesley Clark WHAZZUP?

I-N-T-E-R-N-A-T-I-O-N-A-L-I-S-M and ENFORCED BY

I-N-T-E-R-N-A-T-I-O-N-A-L L-A-W

[OldFriend]

Slick gives a pat to Clark much the same meaning as McCain giving a pat to Kerry.

Just want to get their faces in the news.....

[Helms]

I still think it possible that ole crusty pantsuit may be on a ticket but for VP. How about Clark-Clinton.

[Brian S]

Biden/Clark...

[firewalk]

Bttt

[thegreatbeast]

The real point is just a hope to dilute the dem field even further. The Clintons don't want anyone catching fire and becoming a juggernaut. That way Hillary remains the 800 lb. guerilla (sic).

[OREALLY]

Men like Clark without gonads would be Hillary's choice if she accepted a V.P. position...but I can't see her accepting anything less than Supreme Ruler of the U.S.

[txhurl]

Try Powell/Clark if you want to stay up at night.

[colorado tanker]

For everything else Clinton is, he is still a very good politician, that is he knows how to win elections. He knows Dean and his hard core Dim activist followers are getting the Dims to drink pacifist kool-aid in a time of war. Even though Clark was an awful general, the public would not think of him as a pacifist. He would help the Dim ticket. But not enough to beat Bush in 2004.

[Sonny M]

Try Powell/Clark if you want to stay up at night.

From what I understand, Powell personally hates Clark, along with Shwartzkoph, Clark didn't exactley endear himself to the brass, he just happened to be the most liberal guy who kissed up to the right people (clinton). William Cohen essentially relieved Clark from duty for trying to start world war 3 in the Balkans. If Clark were to run, Powell and Shwartzkoph would automatically jump into campaigning against him, out of pure utter hatred for the guy.

Personally, I think when Hillary makes her run in 2008, he will be named VP on the ticket. By raising his persona as much as possible now, and over the next few years, and as long as he stays loyal (he will), he makes a perfect VP pick in 2008.

[YaYa123]

"How about Clark-Clinton" you asked.

NO WAY!! Hillary will never again take second place to anyone. I keep thinking there's an off chance the democrats will draft her in 2004, due to the poor showing their real candidates are making, and to keep Howard Dean from winning the nomination. Losing to Bush wouldn't hurt her chances in 2008, the run would give her more experience, and according to Larry Sabato, she doesn't have to resign her NY senate seat to run for the presidency.

But wait! Allowing herself to be drafted in 2004, would be "for the good of the party", and Hillary never does anything without herself being the sole beneficiary.

But smarter people than me say the same "NO WAY" to Hillary running in 2004. The wisdom being that she will run in 2008, and have a clear path because she and Bill are doing everything in their power to weaken the candidates running now, ensuring a Bush win. That gives her clear sailing to run and win in 2008.

We're all just guessing, of course, but an email friend of mine, very thoughtful, says that the democrat's secret weapon against Bush this time around would be Evan Byah.

[txhurl]

If Clark were to run, Powell and Shwartzkoph would automatically jump into campaigning against him, out of pure utter hatred for the guy.

Thanks. I expect Powell to defect anyday now, and that scenario was starting to haunt me.

[Sonny M]

Thanks. I expect Powell to defect anyday now, and that scenario was starting to haunt me.

He won't defect, ever. I'm not sure if it was woodward or burnstein, but one of them noted comments by alot of people around Powell, that he always looks to shore up his "moderate credentials" and does so quite often at the presidents expense, to the point where some people aren't even sure what he believes. He went to some function in NYC and basically made alot of jokes to that effect that he wants to be known as a moderate. When he was a general under clinton, he was thought of by them as being very hard conservative, so I think the WP writers have him pegged right, and they like him.

The whole thing between Powell and Clark is just personal stuff. It also doesn't help that alot of people at the top, think that Clark is a mad man, on CNN he's scary with his always "seeking to expand the conflict to global proportions". In the balkans he ordered the british, who refused, to bomb russian ships, its also widely rumored that he intentionally bombed the chinese embassy, and was even giving orders to "secure areas outside the present zone of conflict" (i.e. go into other neighboring countries not involved). He sees himself as wanting to be like a Patton or Ike. His whole search for a greater glory, the lefty's are absolute idiots with this guy, he's not one of them, he's not one of us either, he's delusional in his whims without care of ideology.

[OldCorps]

Clark is an egomaniac, much like MacArthur, without the professional skill. He reached senior rank by virtue of his political loyalty to the Clintons. He is held in low esteem by the vast majority of soldiers who ever served with him.

As for the personal stuff, in the army, you have to trust those with whom you serve because your life and other's depends upon teamwork. Clark was never trusted because he always put his own well being ahead of those around him. That is why Powell and Schwartzkoph detest him.

[Wolverine]

You speak like you know what you are talking about...and I agree with you!

[longtermmemmory]

THIRD PARTY CANDIDATE? Could it be that Clark's presidential run as a THIRD party is being set up to sap voters from bush? In a two way race the dems are DOA but in a three way race?