To: pram
So start reading Dickens and let those of us who care continue the fight. Those who don't care should get out of the way. If you really don't care, that is. I dont care what gays do.... I do however care about the priorities and issues the Republican candidates will be fighting for. I don't want this on the agenda. We make the gay agenda relevant only because we consistantly give it the stage at the expense of issues that actually could get us votes.
157 posted on
06/29/2003 7:55:32 PM PDT by
HairOfTheDog
(Not all those who wander are lost)
To: HairOfTheDog
I don't want this on the agenda. We make the gay agenda relevant only because we consistantly give it the stage at the expense of issues that actually could get us votes.
Too bad. It's an issue and I for one intend to push all my elected officials on it very hard. Taking a pro-traditional marriage stance is a net win for us if done properly. Every time the issue's been put to a vote in a state (even California!) the homo-promo side lost -- badly. Admittedly, we might lose in Massachusetts, though. The horror!
235 posted on
06/29/2003 8:24:48 PM PDT by
Antoninus
(In hoc signo, vinces †)
To: HairOfTheDog
We make the gay agenda relevant only because we consistantly give it the stage at the expense of issues that actually could get us votes. Wrong. And you know it. The homos and their assistants are pushing and shoving. Why don't you want Republicans or conservatives to defend themselves?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson