[First Amendment]

We make the gay agenda relevant only because we consistantly give it the stage at the expense of issues that actually could get us votes.

Wrong. And you know it. The homos and their assistants are pushing and shoving. Why don't you want Republicans or conservatives to defend themselves?

[HairOfTheDog]

Because I am perfectly willing to also tell the gays to blow it out their shorts. If they want to talk to me about gay rights I will make room on my schedule maybe sometime in 2010 from 12:00 to 12:30. We are really good at over-reacting, it is de-escalating that we need work on.

[Ken H]

We make the gay agenda relevant only because we consistantly give it the stage at the expense of issues that actually could get us votes.

Wrong. And you know it.

What sort of time frame are you looking at to get Congress to vote on this Amendment?

You're going to need two-thirds of both the House and Senate and then three fourths of State legislatures, which is 38.

IOW, 34 Senators or 13 States could exercise a veto over this Amendment.

Do you think you can get the necessary votes?