Skip to comments.
Mallard gets 60 years
dallas morning news ^
Posted on 06/27/2003 3:55:41 PM PDT by dennis1x
not eligible for parole for 30.
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: mallard
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 481 next last
To: ALS
"This is your car. This is your car with a dummy in it."
ROFL!!
221
posted on
06/27/2003 6:50:31 PM PDT
by
visualops
(Nothing is fool-proof to a talented fool.)
To: MeeknMing
You were sure close.
222
posted on
06/27/2003 6:52:18 PM PDT
by
Dubya
(Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father,but by me)
To: ALS
It's about time stupidity wasn't rewarded. She would make a great poster child on billboards nationwide extolling the virtues of stupidity behind the wheel. sorta like a Smokey The Bear do over... "This is your car. This is your car with a dummy in it."
So true. And it conjures up quite a mind picture.
To: zarf
She was insane with fear
Fear for herself.
Fear of embarassment, fear of getting caught, fear of getting in trouble for drugs, fear of her parents' disapproval...
The utter lack of fear for the man's health and life is the telling factor.
A person with a conscience would have been afraid for the man's injuries, afraid they wouldn't get them to a doctor in time, afraid they'd be maimed for life...
224
posted on
06/27/2003 6:56:51 PM PDT
by
visualops
(Nothing is fool-proof to a talented fool.)
To: MeeknMing
Defense attorneys called one witness Friday morning. Toxicology expert Gary Wimbish told the jury that the combination of alcohol and drugs consumed by Ms. Mallard on the night she hit Mr. Biggs would likely have prevented her from understanding her surroundings.
Creating a sequence of appropriate responses would be difficult to perform, Mr. Wimbish said of the effect of the alcohol and drugs.
Specifically, the drug ecstasy, which Ms. Mallard testified she took, blocks a persons ability to access long-term memories, such as who to call or what to do in an emergency, Mr. Wimbish said
And we have people in this country advocating legalizing this stuff?
This woman made the decision to kill the man by letting him bleed to death. She made the decision to disengage her brain and to drive. She made the decision to cover up the murder. The sentence was light.
225
posted on
06/27/2003 6:57:13 PM PDT
by
gitmo
(What's in the Constitution isn't. And vice-versa.)
To: MeeknMing
African-Americans are overrepresented in Texas penitentiaries, so to ensure rehabilitation through DIVERSITY, a white woman will be serving in her place.
226
posted on
06/27/2003 6:58:07 PM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(Racism is the codified policy of the USA .... - The Supremes)
To: 1066AD
Agreed.
227
posted on
06/27/2003 7:05:31 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Vote Dimpublican in 2004: Socialism's kinder gentler party: "We will leave no wallet behind!")
To: SerpentDove
It wasn't the state of TX that charged her genuis, it was the county prosecuter. She was in a tough county and the sentence was too harsh.
228
posted on
06/27/2003 7:08:05 PM PDT
by
Az Joe
To: visualops
50 years of making boring highway safety films otter make her think twice next time...
229
posted on
06/27/2003 7:08:48 PM PDT
by
ALS
(http://designeduniverse.com Debunking Darwin since the beginning of time... :)
To: spectre
Obviously you have not read any sentencing guidelines. Priors are ALWAYS taken into account, or lack of them. It's called a mitigating factor. 15-20 years would have been fine with me. You're welcome to your opinion.
230
posted on
06/27/2003 7:09:51 PM PDT
by
Az Joe
To: BossLady
That's it???? What are they saying about it in TX??? What did you want? It was 2nd degree murder. Guaranteed 30 years is nothing to sneeze at.
231
posted on
06/27/2003 7:10:58 PM PDT
by
Lunatic Fringe
(When news breaks, we fix it.)
To: zarf
I tend to agree with you on one level, but have to admit that if someone watched my brother die rather than call for help, I'd consider that premeditated.
She made a concious decision to let him die. Yes, I am sad that her life is ruined too, but she got exactly what she deserved IMO. Her future is gone. BFD considering the person she let die has no concious existance whatsoever.
I have always thought that if one life is forfeit, the other life is forfeit. You can't bring the victim back, so no matter how sad it may appear, the second life is forfeit too.
232
posted on
06/27/2003 7:12:58 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Vote Dimpublican in 2004: Socialism's kinder gentler party: "We will leave no wallet behind!")
To: Az Joe
60 years is a life sentence. She did not walk up to the guy and shoot him in the head. If she had she would have gotten the same sentence. Different crime, different sentence. People doing much worse have gottten much less. No, she did not walk up to the guy and shoot him in the head. That would have been more merciful and may have gotten her a lighter sentence. She did much worse, she intentionally let the guy suffer and bleed to death. The initial hit may have been an accident, but the rest was pure evil and self importance.
Nope, I don't need people like her in my society, and I don't want to pay for her room and board for the next 25 years, either. Terminate her.
To: Az Joe
It wasn't the state of TX that charged her genuis, it was the county prosecuter. She was in a tough county and the sentence was too harsh. Since you called me a name, I will return the favor.
The case is called State of Texas vs. Chante Mallard.
Dumb@ss.
234
posted on
06/27/2003 7:32:07 PM PDT
by
SerpentDove
(Each post focus-group tested for maximum wallop.)
To: MEG33
actually 25 years....the 50 and 10 are running concurrently...however, and i'm sure i'm in the minority here, i really felt it should have been 20 with parole at 10...ecstacy is an awful drug and i just really feel she was contrite about it...and i felt awful for her family...ok, i'm soft-hearted but that's the way i feel...and btw, i live here in texas....
235
posted on
06/27/2003 7:38:32 PM PDT
by
BamaDi
To: Az Joe
and that's basically what i just posted....i really believe it should have been 20 with parole at 10....but like i said, i'm a softie but i truly believe she was genuinally sorry about this....i'm sure i'll have my a$$ chewed about what i wrote and what i feel but hey, that's what this site is all about, right?
236
posted on
06/27/2003 7:40:50 PM PDT
by
BamaDi
To: SerpentDove
The case is called State of Texas vs. Chante Mallard.
And the State of Texas sets the sentencing guidelines.... not the County.....
237
posted on
06/27/2003 7:43:35 PM PDT
by
deport
( BUSH/CHENEY 2004...... with or without the showboy)
To: deport
Precisely.
238
posted on
06/27/2003 7:44:53 PM PDT
by
SerpentDove
(Each post focus-group tested for maximum wallop.)
To: BamaDi
This is a board of opinions.She had the ability to remember her friends phone#..I guess 911 was too much to ask.She listened to his moans,told him she was sorry but was too involved in her predicament to have mercy.He was scared,in excruciating pain,alone and dying.I have compassion.Ijust have it for Mr.Biggs.Depraved indifference has been redefined.
239
posted on
06/27/2003 7:47:00 PM PDT
by
MEG33
To: Az Joe
It wasn't the state of TX that charged her genuis, it was the county prosecuter. She was in a tough county and the sentence was too harsh. Now that's really brilliant, Joe. Wher in Hell did you get your law degree? The back of a matchbook?
Jeeeezzzzzus. I think we can stop looking to Joe for legal opinions.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 481 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson