Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mallard gets 60 years
dallas morning news ^

Posted on 06/27/2003 3:55:41 PM PDT by dennis1x

not eligible for parole for 30.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: mallard
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 481 next last
To: ALS
"This is your car. This is your car with a dummy in it."

ROFL!!
221 posted on 06/27/2003 6:50:31 PM PDT by visualops (Nothing is fool-proof to a talented fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
You were sure close.
222 posted on 06/27/2003 6:52:18 PM PDT by Dubya (Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father,but by me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ALS
It's about time stupidity wasn't rewarded. She would make a great poster child on billboards nationwide extolling the virtues of stupidity behind the wheel. sorta like a Smokey The Bear do over... "This is your car. This is your car with a dummy in it."

So true. And it conjures up quite a mind picture.

223 posted on 06/27/2003 6:56:18 PM PDT by SwatTeam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: zarf
She was insane with fear

Fear for herself.
Fear of embarassment, fear of getting caught, fear of getting in trouble for drugs, fear of her parents' disapproval...

The utter lack of fear for the man's health and life is the telling factor.

A person with a conscience would have been afraid for the man's injuries, afraid they wouldn't get them to a doctor in time, afraid they'd be maimed for life...
224 posted on 06/27/2003 6:56:51 PM PDT by visualops (Nothing is fool-proof to a talented fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Defense attorneys called one witness Friday morning. Toxicology expert Gary Wimbish told the jury that the combination of alcohol and drugs consumed by Ms. Mallard on the night she hit Mr. Biggs would likely have prevented her from understanding her surroundings.
“Creating a sequence of appropriate responses would be difficult to perform,” Mr. Wimbish said of the effect of the alcohol and drugs.
Specifically, the drug “ecstasy,” which Ms. Mallard testified she took, blocks a person’s ability to access long-term memories, such as who to call or what to do in an emergency, Mr. Wimbish said

And we have people in this country advocating legalizing this stuff?

This woman made the decision to kill the man by letting him bleed to death. She made the decision to disengage her brain and to drive. She made the decision to cover up the murder. The sentence was light.
225 posted on 06/27/2003 6:57:13 PM PDT by gitmo (What's in the Constitution isn't. And vice-versa.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
African-Americans are overrepresented in Texas penitentiaries, so to ensure rehabilitation through DIVERSITY, a white woman will be serving in her place.
226 posted on 06/27/2003 6:58:07 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Racism is the codified policy of the USA .... - The Supremes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 1066AD
Agreed.
227 posted on 06/27/2003 7:05:31 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Vote Dimpublican in 2004: Socialism's kinder gentler party: "We will leave no wallet behind!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: SerpentDove
It wasn't the state of TX that charged her genuis, it was the county prosecuter. She was in a tough county and the sentence was too harsh.
228 posted on 06/27/2003 7:08:05 PM PDT by Az Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: visualops
50 years of making boring highway safety films otter make her think twice next time...


229 posted on 06/27/2003 7:08:48 PM PDT by ALS (http://designeduniverse.com Debunking Darwin since the beginning of time... :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: spectre
Obviously you have not read any sentencing guidelines. Priors are ALWAYS taken into account, or lack of them. It's called a mitigating factor. 15-20 years would have been fine with me. You're welcome to your opinion.
230 posted on 06/27/2003 7:09:51 PM PDT by Az Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: BossLady
That's it???? What are they saying about it in TX???

What did you want? It was 2nd degree murder. Guaranteed 30 years is nothing to sneeze at.

231 posted on 06/27/2003 7:10:58 PM PDT by Lunatic Fringe (When news breaks, we fix it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: zarf
I tend to agree with you on one level, but have to admit that if someone watched my brother die rather than call for help, I'd consider that premeditated.

She made a concious decision to let him die. Yes, I am sad that her life is ruined too, but she got exactly what she deserved IMO. Her future is gone. BFD considering the person she let die has no concious existance whatsoever.

I have always thought that if one life is forfeit, the other life is forfeit. You can't bring the victim back, so no matter how sad it may appear, the second life is forfeit too.
232 posted on 06/27/2003 7:12:58 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Vote Dimpublican in 2004: Socialism's kinder gentler party: "We will leave no wallet behind!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Az Joe
60 years is a life sentence. She did not walk up to the guy and shoot him in the head. If she had she would have gotten the same sentence. Different crime, different sentence. People doing much worse have gottten much less.

No, she did not walk up to the guy and shoot him in the head. That would have been more merciful and may have gotten her a lighter sentence. She did much worse, she intentionally let the guy suffer and bleed to death. The initial hit may have been an accident, but the rest was pure evil and self importance.

Nope, I don't need people like her in my society, and I don't want to pay for her room and board for the next 25 years, either. Terminate her.

233 posted on 06/27/2003 7:29:04 PM PDT by weaponeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Az Joe
 It wasn't the state of TX that charged her genuis, it was the county prosecuter. She was in a tough county and the sentence was too harsh. Since you called me a name, I will return the favor.

The case is called State of Texas vs. Chante Mallard.

Dumb@ss.

234 posted on 06/27/2003 7:32:07 PM PDT by SerpentDove (Each post focus-group tested for maximum wallop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
actually 25 years....the 50 and 10 are running concurrently...however, and i'm sure i'm in the minority here, i really felt it should have been 20 with parole at 10...ecstacy is an awful drug and i just really feel she was contrite about it...and i felt awful for her family...ok, i'm soft-hearted but that's the way i feel...and btw, i live here in texas....
235 posted on 06/27/2003 7:38:32 PM PDT by BamaDi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Az Joe
and that's basically what i just posted....i really believe it should have been 20 with parole at 10....but like i said, i'm a softie but i truly believe she was genuinally sorry about this....i'm sure i'll have my a$$ chewed about what i wrote and what i feel but hey, that's what this site is all about, right?
236 posted on 06/27/2003 7:40:50 PM PDT by BamaDi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SerpentDove
The case is called State of Texas vs. Chante Mallard.


And the State of Texas sets the sentencing guidelines.... not the County.....

237 posted on 06/27/2003 7:43:35 PM PDT by deport ( BUSH/CHENEY 2004...... with or without the showboy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: deport
Precisely.
238 posted on 06/27/2003 7:44:53 PM PDT by SerpentDove (Each post focus-group tested for maximum wallop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: BamaDi
This is a board of opinions.She had the ability to remember her friends phone#..I guess 911 was too much to ask.She listened to his moans,told him she was sorry but was too involved in her predicament to have mercy.He was scared,in excruciating pain,alone and dying.I have compassion.Ijust have it for Mr.Biggs.Depraved indifference has been redefined.
239 posted on 06/27/2003 7:47:00 PM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: Az Joe
It wasn't the state of TX that charged her genuis, it was the county prosecuter. She was in a tough county and the sentence was too harsh.

Now that's really brilliant, Joe. Wher in Hell did you get your law degree? The back of a matchbook?

Jeeeezzzzzus. I think we can stop looking to Joe for legal opinions.

240 posted on 06/27/2003 7:47:44 PM PDT by weaponeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 481 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson