Skip to comments.
Gay Marriage Said To Be Approaching Like Tidal Wave
thelouisvillechannel.com ^
| 6/24/03
Posted on 06/26/2003 1:17:54 PM PDT by I_Love_My_Husband
Gay Marriage Said To Be Approaching Like Tidal Wave
Group Wants Amendment To Define Marriage Between Man, Woman
POSTED: 12:08 p.m. EDT June 24, 2003
WASHINGTON -- Alliance for Marriage President Matt Daniels says American culture is about to be hit by the equivalent of a tidal wave.
That's how Daniels describes the legalization of gay marriage, which is under way in Canada and could soon be mandated by U.S. courts as well.
SURVEY |
Should the United States recognize same-sex marriages performed in Canada? |
No, marriages should only be between a man and a woman. Yes, but only because we generally accept other marriages from other nations. Yes, because gay marriage is something we should have here, too.
|
|
|
If that happens, he says, Christians and others who believe the gay lifestyle is wrong will find themselves on the wrong side of the law. Daniels said a proposed federal marriage amendment to the Constitution would define marriage as the union of a man and a woman and let the people rather than the courts decide who should get the benefits of marriage.
The amendment has been introduced in the U.S. House, where it's sponsored by some 20 members of Congress.
Previous Story:
Copyright 2003 by The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: activistcourt; activistsupremecourt; culturewar; downourthroats; gaydivorcedeluge; homosexualagenda; lawrencevtexas; samesexdisorder; samesexmarriage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-112 next last
To: scripter
ping
To: I_Love_My_Husband
"MANDATED BY US COURTS"
In another random ruling, the Supremes wanted to golf, and so dismissed today's case, whatever it was.
Tomorrow, O'Conner is scheduled for her annual Pap Smear, and the plaintiff will lose. Upcoming events include the birthday of her granddaughter, and the lobby is packed with appellants trying to get that date.
On a cold day Tuesday, the Constitution was burned in the Supremes incinerator to provide a little more warmth. "When the hot flashes subside, I need that extra bit of heat," said the lady Justice.
Meanwile, a hostile takeover of the State of Connecticut by the Burea of Indian Affairs proceded nicely through the court, as David Souter's gambling debt appeared ready to be cleared. The $1.3B outstanding debt the the Animowauk tribe has lead the Justice to cede 93% of Connecticut to the tribe, leaving 7% still held by the Federal Government as a retreat for the Supremes. "I just couldn't be happier with the deal," exclaimed Souter.
Separately, Justice Brennan issued a fatwa requiring mandatory cleavage. "Except when a good racial case can be made, all women must expose at least 2.4 inches of cleavage," said the Justice. "Less well endowed individuals can appeal to this precinct for sufficient funding for implants."
Congress, meanwhile adjourned perpetually. Senator Kennedy assured the press, "There's nothing we could do that the Supremes can't handle with a lot less work. I'll see you all in the bar."
President Clinton was seen leaving the ladies room with Ruth Bader-Ginsburg. "I just love her hyme...I mean hyphen."
3
posted on
06/26/2003 1:19:45 PM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(Racism is the codified policy of the USA .... - The Supremes)
To: I_Love_My_Husband
Yep, that's a safe guess at this point..
4
posted on
06/26/2003 1:19:47 PM PDT
by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: AntiGuv
Maybe gay marriage should be legal. I mean why should straight people be the only ones to suffer?
5
posted on
06/26/2003 1:22:25 PM PDT
by
exile
(Exile)
To: I_Love_My_Husband
Canada will become the buttpirates paradise.
6
posted on
06/26/2003 1:22:58 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: exile
A few suffer, a few have a good time...
7
posted on
06/26/2003 1:24:23 PM PDT
by
sit-rep
To: I_Love_My_Husband
Tida wave is an appropriate metaphor. Tidal waves go by and leave only death and destruction in their wake.
8
posted on
06/26/2003 1:25:12 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: I_Love_My_Husband
Kind of a slap in the face of God for what he did to the perps. of Sodom and Gomorrah.
9
posted on
06/26/2003 1:25:30 PM PDT
by
buffyt
(It isn't a CHOICE. It is a CHILD!!!)
To: exile
ha ha ha that is what I told my husband of 30 years! ha ha ha
10
posted on
06/26/2003 1:26:03 PM PDT
by
buffyt
(It isn't a CHOICE. It is a CHILD!!!)
To: I_Love_My_Husband
This is so damn disgusting. I can see it now "Man wants to marry dog." God knows the ACLU and PETA will take that case!
11
posted on
06/26/2003 1:26:12 PM PDT
by
milan
To: buffyt; Blood of Tyrants
I am just completely sickened by today's SCOTUS. It's worse imho than the pro-affirmative action one.
To: Blood of Tyrants
Canada HAS become the rump rangers paradise! If it hadn't they wouldn't even consider this kind of stupid thing....
13
posted on
06/26/2003 1:28:13 PM PDT
by
RRWCC
(Even under a good king, a subject is still a subject.)
To: I_Love_My_Husband
If that happens, he says, Christians and others who believe the gay lifestyle is wrong will find themselves on the wrong side of the law.
You find yourself on the wrong side of the law when you break it. Mainstream Christians will be fine, although a few Rudolphs may kill gay couples or become terrorists.
Those will be put away pronto.
14
posted on
06/26/2003 1:32:17 PM PDT
by
Belial
To: I_Love_My_Husband
And they better be careful that the backlash isn't like a megatsunami.
To: Belial
Maybe not.
In Canada and England, there's the charge of "inciting hatred and intolerance." You may find yourself no longer able to voice your contempt for those lifestyles. You may be forced to rent space to avowed and practicing homosexuals, against your will. It won't be a crime of commission, it will be a crime of ommission.
16
posted on
06/26/2003 1:37:54 PM PDT
by
SJSAMPLE
To: I_Love_My_Husband
I think the fuss will die down once the "Gay Divorce" tidal wave comes. Its probably a few years down the road. I predict some vicious alimony and custody fights. Who gets the toy poodles and the gerbil?
17
posted on
06/26/2003 1:45:19 PM PDT
by
Pearls Before Swine
(South-south-west, south, south-east, east....)
To: I_Love_My_Husband
I dont suppose "we the people" actually have a say so in this?
18
posted on
06/26/2003 1:46:20 PM PDT
by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: I_Love_My_Husband
INTREP
To: Pearls Before Swine
A divorce lawyer's whose specialty is "gay divorce" is gonna clean up
they could probably do a reality tv show just with this theme...
Who gets the poodle and the gerbil...indeed LOL
20
posted on
06/26/2003 1:47:57 PM PDT
by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-112 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson