Skip to comments.
RIAA To Sue Individual's for File Sharing (This could mean you!!!!)
Miami Herald ^
| 06/25/2003
| Ted Bridis
Posted on 06/25/2003 6:15:06 PM PDT by jimmccleod
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 321-337 next last
To: Jhoffa_
And if everybody is a criminal, who is going to respect the law ?
141
posted on
06/25/2003 9:06:19 PM PDT
by
John Lenin
(Government does not solve problems, it subsidizes them)
To: John Lenin
And if everybody is a criminal, who is going to respect the law ?
That's going to be in your closing arguments, I presume?
142
posted on
06/25/2003 9:07:08 PM PDT
by
Jhoffa_
(Hey you kids, get off my lawn!)
To: rs79bm
Why is this so different than recording music from the radio also?
143
posted on
06/25/2003 9:08:54 PM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Remember the three R's: Respect for self; Respect for others; Responsibility for all your actions.)
Comment #144 Removed by Moderator
To: Jhoffa_
Ok, I'll direct that question to directly :)
Why is this different than recording a song from the radio?
145
posted on
06/25/2003 9:10:26 PM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Remember the three R's: Respect for self; Respect for others; Responsibility for all your actions.)
To: SkooldBiDaStayt
Maybe because they're locked out of most distribution channels without them.
Why the hell should I care?
Look, I'm "locked out" of allot of business opportunities without some kind of networking.. Doesn't give me or anyone else a right to steal.
146
posted on
06/25/2003 9:12:59 PM PDT
by
Jhoffa_
(Hey you kids, get off my lawn!)
To: Jhoffa_
I can hear it now: "End the WOD (war on downloads) now!"
To: Calpernia
Why is this different than recording a song from the radio?
I don't know about copying songs from the radio.. But the US code says downloading is illegal.
That's all you need to know.
Anything beyond that can be addressed to the court, from the sound of it.
148
posted on
06/25/2003 9:15:09 PM PDT
by
Jhoffa_
(Hey you kids, get off my lawn!)
To: mylife
No one here intends to rip off printed media
I don't get it. Why are you posting this to me. I don't know anything about copyright laws...I'm outta here.
This whole thing is turning into a bunch of nonsense for a guy who only has about 20 to 30 music files.
How much could they actually sue me for in damages?...not much
To: wizzler
I guess I will have to look up the relevent case law, because it's clear to me that you are the one who is completely unfamiliar with it. Because no one seriously argues that making one copy for personal use, or even making a copy for a friend (as long as no money changes hands) is an an actionable copyright infringement! If you distributed hundreds, sure, you might have a case, and I think RIAA has a case against the p2p-ers. These standards are well-established, for all media, from print to video to audio!
Is it illegal to tape a show with your VCR?
Is it illegal to post an article on FR?
Is it illegal to make a copy of a song or songs from a CD for friend, or to listen to in your tape stereo in your car?
No wizzler, it's not! Your absolutist position, shared by RIAA, has no basis in the case law that governs copyright in this country!
Like I said - they have a case against the p2p sharers, at least as near as I can tell they do. But your assertions are wrong, and you are apparently incapable of citing the relevent case law. But let me tell you wizzler, no matter your armchair opinion, the lawyers arguing both sides of this case are going to cite that law, and the judge is going to look to it for guidance. I suspect RIAA's absolutist position will carry little weight with them as they seek to navigate a new course through it. RIAA may win against the most abusive file sharers, but this claptrap you're trying to argue here has absolutely no basis in copyright law!
150
posted on
06/25/2003 9:15:23 PM PDT
by
motexva
To: mylife
How much "copyrighted" Material is cut and reposted on FR? I think the courts need to weigh "intent". No one here intends to rip off printed media. Before even the courts weigh intent, first the companies will. In 99% of the cases (obvious estimate) of material being posted on FR, no claim is made. In the few cases of when that happens, such as the liberal leaning websites including washpost.com whose goal is contrary to FR, a claim may be made.
At which point FR notifies it's user base who become aware of the issue and refuse to knowingly infringe. Clearly (despite my own personal wishes of the issue even existing) this responsibility resides with FR, which they do a great job of, God Bless their souls.
Point is, the problem corrected itself, even when two entities at opposite ends of the political perspective are involved. Could copyright claims increase to the point where FR incurs further claim damages? Possibly, but IMO that ratio is directly related to the quantity of infringement being perpetrated on the internet at large. Theft of music files increases that ratio.
To: Kevin Curry
I can hear it now: "End the WOD (war on downloads) now!"
You know, I hear downloaded music can cure all kinds of things. Maybe we need a medical exemption...
152
posted on
06/25/2003 9:16:25 PM PDT
by
Jhoffa_
(Hey you kids, get off my lawn!)
To: Jhoffa_
I believe that is what Linux is for :)
153
posted on
06/25/2003 9:16:49 PM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Remember the three R's: Respect for self; Respect for others; Responsibility for all your actions.)
To: Calpernia
Are you asking why is "file-sharing" is different from recording a song off the radio?
If that's what you're asking, the answer is that it's not. Both are infringements of copyright.
As has been explained already in this thread, one is more apt than the other to be pursued vigilantly by copyright holders, because there's a massive difference of degree and damage.
154
posted on
06/25/2003 9:17:36 PM PDT
by
wizzler
To: dagoofyfoot
I posted that as a thought for eveyone. sorry
155
posted on
06/25/2003 9:17:48 PM PDT
by
mylife
To: smpc
So, explain that well said concept with a song(s) that are played on the radio....you make cassettes of and distribute to friends, family, et al.
156
posted on
06/25/2003 9:20:28 PM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Remember the three R's: Respect for self; Respect for others; Responsibility for all your actions.)
To: jimmccleod
What does MP3 mean?
Comment #158 Removed by Moderator
To: xm177e2
Yes, this can be done, with a few more steps. Keep the music on a lan access cpu. 'Requests' are sent in, then the music is put in an accessable download as per the request.
159
posted on
06/25/2003 9:22:12 PM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Remember the three R's: Respect for self; Respect for others; Responsibility for all your actions.)
To: Jhoffa_
How droll.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 321-337 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson