Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DAVID BRODER: LET THE SENATE ADVISE (RAT Pack the Courts) Crap Masquerading as an Editorial
The Wichita Eagle ^ | June 25, 2003 | David "RATman" Broder

Posted on 06/25/2003 12:39:23 PM PDT by RAT Patrol

Let the Senate advise
DAVID BRODER: LET THE SENATE ADVISE
Bush should consult with Democratic leaders about possible Supreme Court nominees.

It would greatly disappoint the warring armies of interest groups in Washington, D.C., salivating for a fight over the next U.S. Supreme Court vacancy. But there is a way out of such a debilitating battle -- with all its ominous implications for the independence and reputation of the judiciary -- if key players at both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue are willing to show some flexibility.

The path around such a knock-down-drag-out fight has been opened by Democratic senators who have urged President Bush to "consult" with Capitol Hill before deciding his choice for the high court.

No one knows when there may be a vacancy to fill, but with the current term coming to an end, speculation is rife that Chief Justice William Rehnquist or Associate Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, both in their 70s, may be ready to retire.

In anticipation of that possibility, Vermont Sen. Patrick Leahy, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, has written to Bush urging him to engage "in meaningful consultation with members of the Senate, including those in the other (Democratic) party, before deciding on nominees."

For more crap click here: RAT Pack the Courts for us


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: constitutionburning; davidbroder; democrattyranny; judicialnominees; liberallitmustests; powergrab; ratpackmafia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 06/25/2003 12:39:24 PM PDT by RAT Patrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
They just took a Broder column and used it for an editorial? Uggghhh!!!!!!!
2 posted on 06/25/2003 12:46:10 PM PDT by rwfromkansas ("There is dust enough on some of your Bibles to write 'damnation' with your fingers." C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
Ginsberg and Souter are consensus judges-I don't think so.
3 posted on 06/25/2003 12:50:36 PM PDT by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
David Broder might just be onto something about "advice and consent." The huge gaping problem that you could drive an M1 tank through is this: The Republicans control the Senate.

Why would Bush go to the minority for advice?

The advice of the majority of Senators will be, "Full steam, Mr. President, you're our go-to guy!"

To allow a minority of Democrats to have power of approval over the pre-selection of nominees is to have exactly what we now have....a minority telling the majority what to do.

Broder should camp out for a week with a copy of the Constitution. Simple majority vote after hearings determines whether the President's nominee passed muster with the entire Senate.
4 posted on 06/25/2003 12:57:34 PM PDT by HatSteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
Broder is an idiot.
5 posted on 06/25/2003 1:16:34 PM PDT by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
Send them a copy of the Constitution.

This is why we need better History teachers in the classroom.
6 posted on 06/25/2003 1:18:03 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyal Buckeye
He is also brain dead. Ever see him on TV?
7 posted on 06/25/2003 1:20:18 PM PDT by pankot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
The only time this crap is a "good idea" is when the Rats are in the minority. I don't recall them ever suggesting this when they held a majority... do you?
8 posted on 06/25/2003 1:32:14 PM PDT by Poseidon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HatSteel
Why would Bush go to the minority for advice?

Good point.

9 posted on 06/25/2003 2:04:22 PM PDT by RAT Patrol (Congress can give one American a dollar only by first taking it away from another American. -W.W.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nyconse
Ginsberg and Souter are consensus judges-I don't think so.

No kidding. Of course, he chooses a liberal republican to make his point. That's what liberals always do. They find a Republican who agrees with them on any given subject, even though he is the LONE Republican with that perspective, and they use that to prove they are bipartisan. Lying jerks!

Further, what's this "consensus" crap? We have a consensus (majority) already. The RATs want a super-majority.

10 posted on 06/25/2003 2:09:29 PM PDT by RAT Patrol (Congress can give one American a dollar only by first taking it away from another American. -W.W.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
Well ... maybe someone should send Mr. Broder a copy of the Constitution with the troublesome paragraphs highlighted - thereby enlightening Mr. Broder to the fact that what he's proposing is UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

And ... I don't recall anyone on the democrat side making such a stupid statement when Clinton was in office - like having the republicans CONSULT with x42 on nominees ...??

Can anyone spell D E S P E R A T E ...???
11 posted on 06/25/2003 2:10:39 PM PDT by CyberAnt ( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
To be fair to Hatch, what he said in response to this latest Rat proposal was "when Democrats say "consult" they mean "do what they want""; and something like 'maybe if the Democrats hadn't been such obstructionist a*******s for the last two years we would have listened to them'
12 posted on 06/25/2003 2:50:05 PM PDT by JohnnyZ (I barbeque with Sweet Baby Ray's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
"Consultation, to Democrats, means accepting their views," Hatch said. He said that if Democrats had cooperated with Bush "instead of smearing people" who were nominated for lower court judgeships, they would have more bargaining power.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/935082/posts

13 posted on 06/25/2003 2:53:04 PM PDT by JohnnyZ (I barbeque with Sweet Baby Ray's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
SO typical - a liberal trying to pretend he is impartial and doing a poor job of it.

I'm surprised the old turd hasn't dried up and blown away yet.
14 posted on 06/25/2003 3:06:50 PM PDT by republicman (If not now, then when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
Broder likes to sound like he's being non-political when he's actually trying to boost the Dems/liberals.
15 posted on 06/25/2003 3:09:06 PM PDT by lasereye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
I saw David Broder in the flesh one time. He was covering a Republican Party rally, and I thought he was a member of the custodial staff at the school where the rally was held. Reading Broder's stuff is like reading Bob Novak, which is like watching paint dry. The only two exciting writers left are Michalle Malkin and Ann Coulter.
16 posted on 06/25/2003 4:36:26 PM PDT by daddypatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
What all of this really says is that RATs and their liberal Republican friends value abortion over the Constitution or anything else.

RAT journalists have 5 Republican phone numbers: McCain, Hatch, Spector, Chaffee, and Snowe. Jumping Jeffords recently jumped himsself off their speed dials.

17 posted on 06/25/2003 4:43:29 PM PDT by RAT Patrol (Congress can give one American a dollar only by first taking it away from another American. -W.W.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
In 2000 the Supreme Court terrifed the Liberals. The creature they had created, the super-legislature, showed that it could be used AGAINST them. The case in Michigan showed that the court no longer exists as a unit but consists of parties, with two judges axting as swing votes. So now they want to bargain, to insure that the new appointees swing their way, at least on certain issues. To hell with that.
18 posted on 06/25/2003 7:10:02 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
Freepers, rather than waiting to see what happens with Estrada, we need to take the lead. That means presuring Senators, special interest groups, media organizations, etc. This thread is meant to be an ongoing effort to get this man confirmed. For too many years liberals have had their way on the courts. Now, President Bush is in a position to move the courts to the right. The election of '02 showed that the country is with the President. I think it's time to let Daschle, Hillary, and Pelosi know this is Bush country. Are you with me! Let's FREEP these people.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/847037/posts
19 posted on 06/25/2003 7:28:37 PM PDT by votelife (FREE MIGUEL ESTRADA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
DAVID BRODER:
LET THE
SENATE
ADVISE

Should read:

LET THE SENATE minority
CHOSE THE NEW JUSTICES AND
RIDE ROUGHSHOD OVER
THE PRESIDENT
AND THE SENATE MAJORITY

20 posted on 06/25/2003 7:38:25 PM PDT by syriacus (Why DO liberals keep describing one other as THOUGHTFUL individuals?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson