Posted on 06/24/2003 2:11:51 PM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
Estrogen-progestin pills may cause an aggressive form of breast cancer and make it harder to find tumors until they have reached a later, less-curable stage, according to one of the biggest, most authoritative analyses yet.
The study is part of a run of bad news recently about the hormones routinely taken by millions of women after menopause.
"Hopefully, it will convince women to reconsider," said Dr. Susan Hendrix of Wayne State University in Detroit, a co-author of the new analysis. "We've got to find a better way to help women with their menopausal symptoms."
Some previous studies suggested breast tumors might be less aggressive in hormone users; other studies indicated the opposite. Previous research also suggested that hormones might make breast tissue more dense, hindering the detection of tumors.
To try to answer the questions more definitively, the researchers took a closer look at data from the government's landmark Women's Health Initiative study, which was halted last summer after it was found that estrogen-progestin pills raise the risk of heart attack, strokes and breast cancer.
While last summer's findings led many women to stop taking hormones, an estimated 3 million women still use them, primarily to relieve hot flashes and other symptoms of menopause.
The latest findings appear in Wednesday's Journal of the American Medical Association.
The analysis involved 16,608 women ages 50 to 79 who used either combined hormone treatment or dummy pills for an average of five years.
As of January, breast cancer had developed in 245 women who used the combined hormone treatment and in 185 women who had taken dummy pills.
Hormone users' tumors were larger at diagnosis, 1.7 centimeters on average versus 1.5 centimeters in placebo women. Tumors had begun to spread in 25.4 percent of hormone users, compared with 16 percent of placebo women.
The researchers said this appears to mean that in women on estrogen-progestin, the tumors both grow faster — that is, they are more aggressive — and escape detection longer.
Overall, women on both hormones faced a 24 percent increased risk of breast cancer — equal to eight extra cases of cancer per year for every 10,000 women taking the pills.
The increased risk did not appear in the first two years of treatment. But Hendrix said the tumors may have been present early on but were not detected until later because of hormone-induced breast density.
The new analysis did not examine breast density. But researchers think progestin may be the culprit because it can cause breast cells — both normal and abnormal — to proliferate, an effect that may be accentuated when the hormone is combined with estrogen.
Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, maker of the Prempro pills used in the study, said hormones remain an appropriate therapy when used at the lowest possible dose for the shortest possible time.
The latest analysis is by far the most conclusive, said Dr. Peter Gann, an associate professor of preventive medicine at Northwestern University who was not involved in the study.
It "further worsens the news for long-term hormone replacement therapy. It suggests the excess breast cancer risk is not trivial," Gann said.
Last summer's Women's Health Initiative findings shattered long-held beliefs that hormones are good for women's hearts. Last month, another analysis of data from the study found that instead of sharpening the mind, hormones may double the risk of Alzheimer's and other forms of dementia.
A second, smaller study in Wednesday's journal also confirmed a link between combined hormone treatments and breast cancer and suggested estrogen-only treatment may be safer.
The study involved 975 Seattle-area women ages 65 to 79. The greatest breast cancer risk was in women who used estrogen-progestin for at least five years, even if they took the progestin component only some days a month.
Those who used estrogen alone, even for 25 years or longer, showed no appreciable increased risk, according to the study, led by Dr. Christopher Li of Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle.
Estrogen alone is recommended only for women with hysterectomies because it can cause uterine cancer unless balanced by progestin.
The researchers said more definitive answers will come from the continuing estrogen-only part of the Women's Health Initiative study.
Ladies, Freepmail me if you want to know more!!
That isn't true... The glycemic index is higher in refined breads, but the whole grain breads with fiber greated than 3gr per serving come out with a moderate index (rye, etc). And you need the thiamine, niacin, fiber etc... Sorry, I worked in Oncology too long to give up fiber.
I never took hormone pills and most of my hot flashes went away after about a year. I maybe get one or two a month now but my short-term memory is shot to sh_t. I forget to do things (like paying bills).
...and the fact that I am so cranky I am a threat to humanity....
For almost a year I wanted to kill everyone I laid eyes on. It was almost uncontrollable RAGE. That feelng also went away, plus, I never did murder anyone.
PMS don't hold a candle to this.
And last, but not least, I no longer have PMS. :-)
Good luck to ya!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.