New Abortion Ban Ignores Court (Double-Bagger Baby Killer Barf Alert!!!)

Omaha World-Herald ^ | June 22, 2003 | Priscilla Smith

[grania]

So if a foreigner conceives on American soil you want that baby to have American citizenship?

Assuming the validity of your argument, you make an excellent argument as to why the US should be shut to new residents.

[grania]

Thus, if a member of Al Qaeda impregnates his wife on the outskirts of a Saudi airbase and can prove it..... that probably future Islamist thug is an American citizen even though it was born in say... Mecca, Medina or another Saudi City

They never get in the country. Nothing to it.

[grania]

Of course, if they're carrying dual citizenship you can't legally keep them out because they're American citizens under the US Constitution and thus you can't apply any regulations to them that wouldn't apply to you.

Since I don't hold dual citizenship, I have no trouble with putting an end to dual citizenship "applying to me".

[rmgatto]

I guarantee you, your line of thinking taken to its natural conclusion will not get you abortion outlawed, it will turn your home state into a welfare state a la sweden.

First of all, I live in northern virginia which ain't far from sweden to begin with. Second, we disagree on a core values issue. Many of us believe this is absolute: killing an innocent human being purely for convenience is murder of the foullest kind.

If Dante were alive he'd create a circle of hell lower than the Judas's ninth for perpetrators of abortion and their apologists. By comparison with abortion, Macbeth is a comedy. And the blood of millions will not wash off--it will damn many to the tenth circle.

The arguments you present are simply irrevelant to those who believe that abortion in this country is mass murder on an horrible, unprecedented scale.

[Timmy]

$500 to the first person who can find where the US Government had the authority to declare Roe v Wade or pass a ban on partial birth abortion that carries legal weight outside of federal land. Hint: it ain't there.

Well, pay up! It's right there in the section about the right to privacy . . . uh . . . wait a minute . . .

[Golden Gate]

1st and early 2nd trimester... - Trimesters -

Does anyone know, - What is the orgin of " Trimesters" ? Is 'trimester' a legitimate medical term that was used in medical science before the modern 'abortion' debates of the 60's & 70's (& to present)? - OR, is the term "trimester" merely 'abortion-speak'? Was "trimester" merely a creation of the proaborts and/or the 'Blackmun Court' with its Roe/Doe opinions?

[cgk]

ping...

[Coleus]

And don't forget the 5th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution guaranteeing us LIFE. Yes all life. Abortion was Illegal then and they never thought it would be the way things are today so the exact "word" of Abortion is not there. It doesn't have to be since it's implied.

[Coleus]

Bone up on the constitution.

Libertarians for life
http://www.l4l.org/

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/861695/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/929095/posts
I don't know where you've been but the Republican Congress pushed through a Welfare Reform Bill during the Clinton Administration which was signed on the 3rd try before election. I know in NJ we limit welfare to 2 children, a law proposed by a black democrat assemblyman.


Why don't y'all also fight to repeal the federal drug laws which carry over into state borders (no legal, constitutional jurisdiction for intrastate commerce), the PATRIOT Act, Medicare, Social(ist) Security, the federal gun laws, the FDA (so people can actually get real medicalcare) and stuff like that. >>>>>

I'm for that too the 10th amendment; however, LIFE is first, everything else is secondary. Sorry about that.

Platform of the Republican Party:
http://www.rnc.org/GOPInfo/Platform/2000platform4.htm

Seems the Republicans wants the constitution to protect life too, so I guess you are not a republican?

We support a human life amendment to the Constitution and we endorse legislation to make clear that the Fourteenth Amendment’s protections apply to unborn children. Our purpose is to have legislative and judicial protection of that right against those who perform abortions. We oppose using public revenues for abortion and will not fund organizations which advocate it. We support the appointment of judges who respect traditional family values and the sanctity of innocent human life.

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the heads up!

[Coleus]

No you're the Libertarian, I am a republican and follow the pro-life platform of the republican party
http://www.rnc.org/GOPInfo/Platform/2000platform4.htm

where they assure the 14th amendment applies to the unborn, please read it this time. Please do not twist thing around, thank you.

[MHGinTN]

When confronted with a difficult and complex social problem, it is the strange individual who will offer killing off the vulnerable in order to ease the problem, when so many other means and avenues can be considered that don't bury the consequences of behaviors for which individual males and females ought be responsible.

[MHGinTN]

You're still dangling out there supporting killing the innocent alive unborn as a means to solve societal problems. It makes it very difficult to find something rational in your posts to address.

[Blood of Tyrants]

A ban without a health exception, the court held, would endanger women because it would prevent the physician from performing the method of abortion that was the safest for a particular woman.

A partial birth abortion is NEVER safer than a cesaerian and NEVER medically necessary.