Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton Attacks Bush,U.S. - Urges a "Globalized and Integrated World"
International News Analysis ^ | 06/17/03 | Toby Westerman

Posted on 06/19/2003 6:37:14 AM PDT by bedolido

U.S. Senator Hillary Clinton (D NY) has attacked U.S. President George W. Bush, and questioned U.S. intelligence effectiveness in an interview published in the online version of the German newsmagazine Der Spiegel.

Der Spiegel is Germany's leading newsmagazine, and is highly regarded throughout Europe. Clinton's remarks will gain a high degree of publicity across the European continent, attracting support within Europe's generally liberal political environment, where socialism enjoys wide acceptance.

While asserting her support for Bush in Afghanistan and Iraq, Sen. Clinton criticized present U.S. policy in Europe, and questioned the Bush administration's use of intelligence information.

Clinton stated that she was "not ready to answer 'yes'" to Der Spiegel's question whether misleading information was used to launch the war in Iraq.

"I know my husband received the same intelligence information [during his presidency as did Bush]." Clinton asserted that "the real question is have we obtained accurate information, or have the findings been altered for military or political purposes?"

Clinton also urged greater interdependence between Europe and the U.S., stating that America should seek "a secure and solid foundation" for relations with Europe, instead of "relying only upon our [U.S.] military strength."

Praising her husband's close relationship with European leaders during his period in office, Clinton declared that "for eight years we were on the right course to a globalized and integrated world - which is coming, one way or the other."

Clinton publicly revealed the foreign policy thrust of the Democratic Party in a remarkable moment of candor, a position Democratic leaders have not made clear to the public, but which is keenly understood and supported by Clinton.

Not only is a "globalized and integrated world" inevitable, it is a foreign policy priority of the Democratic Party.

According to Clinton, a single, unified world "is a perspective we Democrats have not successfully made clear."

In the Der Spiegel interview, Clinton asserted that her husband sought to pass "effective laws" and proposed "more money" to carry out the struggle against terror, but "the Republicans prevented" measures from becoming enacted.

Hillary Clinton, already considered an intriguing figure in Europe, will gain additional credibility as a stateswoman as a result of the Der Spiegel interview.

As Europeans become more familiar with Clinton and her views, their impact will be felt as they bring money and influence to her or a like politician's campaign.

The socialist European expectation will be that a Democratic victory will bring into power a U.S. government more to the liking of one-world European politicians.

Copyright 2003 International News Analysis Today INA Today.com P.O. Box 5182 Rockford, Il 61125


TOPICS: Breaking News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: attacks; clinton; hillary; socialistbitch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last
To: MississippiMan
false prophet. And she can't wait to put it in place.

wonder if SHE is the False Prophet John spoke of in Revelations. Very frightening times we live in.

41 posted on 06/19/2003 8:19:53 AM PDT by bedolido (please let my post be on an even number... small even/odd phobia here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Bill Davis FR
Correct. Hillary wants a unified world, and herself being its leader. She is far more of a threat to freedom than BJ Clinton was.
42 posted on 06/19/2003 8:23:50 AM PDT by tomahawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
I can sure imagine her being in the thick of things, but it's hard to envision her as a religious leader, even a fake one. That's going to require someone who already has tons of "religious" credibility IMHO.

MM

43 posted on 06/19/2003 8:24:54 AM PDT by MississippiMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
Already posted here and here. Worth major coverage, though!
44 posted on 06/19/2003 8:25:08 AM PDT by Ragtime Cowgirl (“It started with a mistake and it ended with a cover-up.”Sudan aspirin factory owner re 8-98 BJ bomb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
Actually, I think we have a global world.

With you 100%. The world is definitely global. LOL! What an idiot. (The Hildabeaste, not you.)

Somebody please post that pix of her in a SS uniform. Suitable.

45 posted on 06/19/2003 8:29:08 AM PDT by upchuck (Contribute to "Republicans for Al Sharpton for President in 2004." Dial 1-800-SLAPTHADONKEY :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
this woman cares nothing for the u.s. constitution
46 posted on 06/19/2003 8:31:33 AM PDT by Norse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
Watched "Star Trek IV" last night, wherein the "globalized, unified world" helplessly sat by while the American James T. Kirk saved the world by defying the "Federation" and kicking ass. The Socialists were calling for Kirk's butt on a platter while he was out saving the planet. Sound familiar?
47 posted on 06/19/2003 8:55:02 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
But wait, aren't the Bush's the secret force behind the New World Order Bilderberger Templar Trilateral Commission Club?? How can anyone be more One-Worlder than that? [/sarcasm]
48 posted on 06/19/2003 8:55:28 AM PDT by BlueNgold (Feed the Tree .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
Let's see, we have Republicans, who are One World Globalists.

Then we have the Democrats, who are One World Globalists.

The American worker is completely screwed, you know.

49 posted on 06/19/2003 8:57:08 AM PDT by Lazamataz (PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueNgold
Good point. I was reading the thread expecting to see some of the anti-Bush crowd on here spouting their tripe. Where are they? I need a ping list...
50 posted on 06/19/2003 9:06:50 AM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
Groucho says, "Can you believe the BS, Der Spiegel, is try to pass on as news?"


51 posted on 06/19/2003 9:08:14 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Evil Old White Devil Californian Grampa for big Al Sharpton and Nader in primaries!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
I wait for the moment when Hilary explains why she did not advise her wet hubby to resign after Monica. The most damiging thing to this country ever, was Clinton clinging to power like a little monkey on his mom's breasts. Pakistan obtained nukes, Kosovo Islamists got a country of their own, therrorism spread unchecked everywhere - all with help of Clinton's "family".

I have no repsect for Hilary and I don't have even a minute to waste for her posturing. When she starts talking about the stupid things done by her hubby, then I'll listen.
52 posted on 06/19/2003 9:10:38 AM PDT by singsong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
Michael Barone has a related article on Opinion Journal, Hillary 2008

He says that both Bill and Hillary were supporters of the "Third Way" during the Clinton tenure in the Whitehouse, that Bill in fact ran on that platform. The Democrat party has since moved away from supporting free trade, welfare reform and Social Security reform in an effort to find a position to counter the Bush administration. Barone says that Hillary may return to this position for her 2008 campaign. It looks as though she is starting early.

We need to keep pointing up the inconsistency between Hillary's stated centrist position in NY and what she says overseas. Hillary lies.

53 posted on 06/19/2003 9:13:30 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
Have been wondering since this appeared. . . any guesses as to how many months before it will be open warfare between the Commies on the left pushing increasingly overtly for Global Government Tyranny and those of us on the other side.

Personally, I think we would do well to blackwash Shrillery Hellery Antoinette de Fosterizer de Sade as the true Global Tyranny Commie she is

in every way we can, at every opportunity. Blackwashing with her is just truthtelling.
54 posted on 06/19/2003 9:17:27 AM PDT by Quix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reeses
good disection...
55 posted on 06/19/2003 9:41:28 AM PDT by KC Burke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
This is a dangerous and sick woman who is adored by many in the extremist crowd she runs with. She appeals to anyone who has a gripe and wants to get back at the system. This scenario reminds one of Germany in the 30's or Russia in the Teens.

Shame on New York State (and the NYS Republicans) for allowing her to become a senator no less and gaining a platform to spout her poison!

56 posted on 06/19/2003 10:17:25 AM PDT by eleni121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eleni121
Let us catalog these Hillary statements and present them to her 2006 Senate opponent for campaign use. S/he could effectively show Hildebeast to be against US sovereingty. She also made anti-war quotes overseas while voting to support the President here. "Two faced" merely begins to describe her mendacity.
57 posted on 06/19/2003 10:26:05 AM PDT by Dilbert56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
>> Not only is a "globalized and integrated world" inevitable, it is a foreign policy priority of the Democratic Party. <<

Hitlery is the Anti-Christ.
58 posted on 06/19/2003 11:04:22 AM PDT by appalachian_dweller (Character is doing the right thing when nobody is looking. – JC Watts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
Our Founding Fathers wanted us to avoid foreign entanglements. Hello Hillary, you have heard of them haven't you?
59 posted on 06/19/2003 11:11:25 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Our Founding Fathers wanted us to avoid foreign entanglements. Hello Hillary, you have heard of them haven't you?

Dubya and the globalist neocons apparently haven't heard of them either.
It really makes one wonder what their squabble with Hillary is all about.
Or is it really just all for show?
Just why did Trent Lott derail the impeachment anyway?

60 posted on 06/19/2003 11:17:33 AM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson