Skip to comments.
Shot forced on newborn over parents' objections
WorldNetDaily.com ^
| Wednesday, June 18, 2003
| By Diana Lynne
Posted on 06/17/2003 10:11:18 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-250 next last
To: AnnaZ
Ping ing ing ing
2
posted on
06/17/2003 10:13:08 PM PDT
by
agitator
(Ok, mic check...line one...)
To: JohnHuang2
Sending someone home from the hospital with a serious, transmittable disease where the cure involves one shot is lunatic irresponsibility from a public health standpoint. The doctors did right.
3
posted on
06/17/2003 10:18:09 PM PDT
by
CGTRWK
To: CGTRWK
Who had the serious transmittable disease?
4
posted on
06/17/2003 10:33:33 PM PDT
by
freebilly
(I think they've misunderestimated us....)
To: JohnHuang2
I hate say this
Parents of that child SHUT UP first of all if your child when he go to school he need has ALL HIS SHOTS
I have no SYMPATHY FOR THESE PARENTS
5
posted on
06/17/2003 10:45:29 PM PDT
by
SevenofNine
(Not everybody in it for truth, justice, and the American way=Det Lennie Briscoe)
To: JohnHuang2
Unintended Consequences.
6
posted on
06/17/2003 11:05:20 PM PDT
by
soundbits
To: JohnHuang2; All
Nightmare is right. These parents have the final say as to what shots their baby will receive according to their state law. Just as I have the final say as to what shots my baby receives. Forcing a shot into a baby, when a parent objects on moral and religious grounds is akin to living in in a communist state.
The argument that they'll need them when they go to school doesn't stand either: there are exemptions for parents who object for moral/religious reasons. If this was an Islamic couple who objected, do you think they would have forced the baby to be shot up with a vaccine? Of course not. But for a Catholic hospital to do this to "their own" without the benefit of the final test is beyond reproach. Hep tests are notorious for false positives, as are many pre-birth tests for defects.
7
posted on
06/17/2003 11:07:11 PM PDT
by
cgk
(Rummy on WMD: We haven't found Saddam Hussein yet, but I don't see anyone saying HE didn't exist.)
To: JohnHuang2
Yet another story about how easy it may become to turn the United States into a third world country. Vaccinate! No choice here, and if you are auto immune deficient, well, you have an excuse, AS AN INFANT.
8
posted on
06/17/2003 11:32:44 PM PDT
by
Terridan
(God help us send these Islamic Extremist savages back into Hell where they belong...)
To: SevenofNine
Not if they home school him.
9
posted on
06/17/2003 11:35:40 PM PDT
by
Mr. K
((yes I said 'bimp' you silly english pig-dog poofter))
To: SevenofNine
What with way write? Purpose or just dumb write not know better?
To: SevenofNine
I hate to say this, but those tests were flawed, as are your comments. Read the cpmplete article and notice that the better test came back negative. So they gave this child a shot that could cause harm in the future. Waiting a little longer would not have hurt. Where's you sympathy now?
To: JohnHuang2
VERY scary. Until I read this and a linked report on immunization shots, I thought it was all a bunch of chicken-littleisms and hype. Now I know better.
I also, until I read this article, had much more faith in normal health care with regard to pre- and neo-natal care. It wasn't my choice to fork over the $1000 to pay for a homebirth for my daughter; my wife insisted on it. My health insurance would have made it completely free had I gone through our HMO instead. Now that I read this story, I won't be grumbling anymore about having to have shelled out that grand.
To: JohnHuang2

If the parents didn't authorize the shot, and if the doctors/nurses involved weren't the legal guardians at the time, then the child was assaulted.
If this incident really gets the parents fired up, then all that they have to do is to file assault charges. Was there uninvited physical contact? Did it cause harm?
Pretty easy case, I bet.
13
posted on
06/18/2003 12:27:20 AM PDT
by
Southack
(Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: SevenofNine
1)their is a box for the parents to mark on the admission health form that states that no vaccinations were given based on religious grounds.
2)the test came back negative, theirfore, the child received a vac. for a non-existant potential problem against the wishes of his parents.
3)if you hated to say that, why say it?
4)i know about erring on the side of caution, but, even the wifes physician knew that the chances of her having hep.b were slim to none, he should have interviened. coincheck
To: JohnHuang2
If you must dance, you musy pay the piper; any court that can guarantee your rights can suspend your privileges, medical care is now a privilege and this couple gave up their rights when they presented themselves and their baby to the medical-care facility.
Outside of hermits, there are no true individuals left in this world.
To: CGTRWK
How in the Hell is a newborn baby going to transmit a blood-borne disease to anyone other than the parents who bore him once they take him home?
To: SevenofNine
I hate say this Parents of that child SHUT UP first of all if your child when he go to school he need has ALL HIS SHOTS
Somebody please rescue me; if this poster is for real I have been up way too late.
To: JohnHuang2
Boy, I hate it when I hit two keys at once and the wrong one jumps up; musy was must; sorry.
To: CGTRWK
It's not just one shot either.
19
posted on
06/18/2003 12:53:00 AM PDT
by
Woahhs
To: SevenofNine
Parents of that child SHUT UP first of all if your child when he go to school he need has ALL HIS SHOTSI don't suppose you think the coherence of a sentence is a good indicator of the value of the opinion.
You should.
20
posted on
06/18/2003 12:58:38 AM PDT
by
Woahhs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-250 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson