Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Church tosses defiant minister: He refused to stop performing gay marriages
The Cincinnati Enquirer ^ | Tuesday, June 17, 2003 | Andrea Uhde

Posted on 06/17/2003 5:27:26 PM PDT by HatSteel

[img]

Kyla Ford and Eryn Robinson, both 7 and of Anderson Township, hold a sign in support of Rev. Stephen Van Kuiken at Lakeside Presbyterian Church Monday.


(Mike Simons photo)
| ZOOM |

FORT MITCHELL - The Rev. Stephen Van Kuiken was formally renounced by the Presbytery of Cincinnati on Monday for continuing to perform same-sex marriages.

The action, taken by a voting body made up of minister members and elder commissioners in the Presbytery, means the pastor of the Mount Auburn Presbyterian Church can no longer serve as a minister and loses his church membership.

The vote was 119-45, with four voters abstaining.

"I'm sad, and I'm disappointed," Van Kuiken said after the vote. "This is a sad day. This is an issue that is going to continue to stay at the surface of the Presbyterian Church."

Van Kuiken was unsure of his next action. He said he will take some time to re-evaluate what he will do. He is considering filing a complaint with the Synod of the Presbyterian Church USA, claiming his due process rights were violated because he had an appeal pending on an earlier rebuke.

"It's important for me to be true to myself and be true to what my beliefs are about God," he said.

Van Kuiken's case has been closely watched across the country as Presbyterians - who also ban gay clergy - and other faiths continue to debate the roles of gays and lesbians in the church.

In the denomination's first ecclesiastical trial on the issue, Van Kuiken was found guilty in April of marrying gays and lesbians. He was given a public rebuke and told not to do it again. He wed two women on May 17.

The voting body met at the Lakeside Presbyterian Church in Fort Mitchell after a vigil supporting Van Kuiken.

"I just think it was unavoidable," said Howard Smith, one of the voters in favor of the renunciation. "His actions made the action necessary by the Presbytery unless they want to totally disregard the (church) constitution."

A number of members of Mount Auburn Presbyterian attended Monday's vote and the vigil.

"I think it's a travesty what they're doing," said Terrell Lackey. "Being a gay man and a black man, too, I can't believe the world is still the way it is. Cincinnati is sad."

About one-third of the 280 members of the Mount Auburn church are gay.

This is the first time the Presbytery of Cincinnati has removed a minister for performing same-sex marriages, and possibly the first case in any Presbytery nationwide.

Presbyteries don't have to report such cases to the Presbyterian Church USA, but the organization isn't aware of others, said Laurie Griffith, manager of judicial process and social witness at the Presbyterian Church USA in Louisville.

Van Kuiken's rebuke in April was the lightest of possible punishments.

He also faces accusations, including blasphemy, from a California lawyer who filed the original complaints against him.

Van Kuiken could become a church member again, but he would have to restart the process if he wants to be a minister again, said the Rev. Melissa Bane Sevier, Presbytery moderator.

---

E-mail auhde@enquirer.com


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: culture; gay; homosexual; homosexuality; marriage; presbyterian; samesexunion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-196 next last
To: ohioWfan
Exactly, O. My wife is about as unsubmissive as they come by nature, but we both want to do what's RIGHT, not necessarily what our natural tendencies may be. Thus, she IS a submissive wife as that's defined in the Bible, but she'd laugh in anyone's face who thought she was "subservient."

mm

41 posted on 06/17/2003 7:01:04 PM PDT by MississippiMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: HatSteel
"Husband of one wife," is not, to me, enough in and of itself to defend an absolutely-no-women-in-authority position.

There are churches which do not allow women to teach Jr High Sunday School classes because they think 13 year old boys are men, and women are Biblically mandated not to teach them......and there are churches that ordain women as complete equals in authority in the church.

I suspect the truth, as it usually is, is somewhere in between those two positions, and equally devout believers draw the line at different spots on the continuum. The danger comes when people ascribe the 'absolute' status to arguable positions that only belong to the essentials of Christian doctrine, i.e. the divinity of Christ, the cross, and the resurrection.

42 posted on 06/17/2003 7:04:59 PM PDT by ohioWfan (BUSH 2004!!!! Leadership, Integrity, Morality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: HatSteel
He'll (God) "just have to restart the process..." to regain full membership.
43 posted on 06/17/2003 7:05:25 PM PDT by bethelgrad (for God and country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMan
I like your wife! :o)

Your marriage sounds like ours.......it's wonderful, and it works!

(Maybe that's because it's the way God intended marriage to be......)

44 posted on 06/17/2003 7:06:40 PM PDT by ohioWfan (BUSH 2004!!!! Leadership, Integrity, Morality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: bethelgrad
Bethel, Minnesota grad??
45 posted on 06/17/2003 7:07:38 PM PDT by ohioWfan (BUSH 2004!!!! Leadership, Integrity, Morality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: HatSteel
"History fails to record a single precedent in which nations subject to moral decay have not passed into political and economic decline. There has been either a spiritual awakening to overcome the moral lapse, or a progressive deterioration leading to ultimate national disaster." --General Douglas MacArthur

Apparently, others are beginning to notice.

46 posted on 06/17/2003 7:12:23 PM PDT by Chuckster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
The point Ohio (Is that Ohio Wesleyan?) is that those who cite the "husband of one wife" verse are not ignorant bumpkins. They really do have a point, and those who discount their point because of theological liberal bias are only cheating themselves of the opportunity to think their way biblically and clearly through this issue.

Personally, I'm satisfied that there was a female order of deaconesses, but that there was no similar order of female elders.

The "no male or female" verse in Galatians can legitimately be limited to "God's acceptance" of anyone, no matter sex, race, economic condition.

47 posted on 06/17/2003 7:30:27 PM PDT by HatSteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: HatSteel
Well, my Baptist Dad went to Ohio Wesleyan, which is a Methodist school, but my family and I are now Presbyterian, and are hearing more of the Gospel in our present church than we heard for the past several years in our increasingly 'contemporary' Baptist church.

As to the role of women, our church is far from liberal and we have women who are elders. As I said before, prayerful, reasonable dedicated disciples of the Word come down at different points on the issue.

48 posted on 06/17/2003 7:39:01 PM PDT by ohioWfan (BUSH 2004!!!! Leadership, Integrity, Morality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
You might like your church. And I like mine which does the same thing.

But...female elders are arguably unbiblical. The argument against simply cannot be overcome. It can only be disagreed with on a patchwork-biblical basis.
49 posted on 06/17/2003 7:46:07 PM PDT by HatSteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
The minister should have stepped down rather than hijack the church.

Which would defeat the whole purpose. That precise purpose is to hijack a major denomination in order to attempt to legitimize homosexuality and denigrate christianity. Most of these people are not christians in any logical sense of the word. They do not accept Christ as their lord and savior and they deny his divinity. They denounce scripture whenever it doesn't further their cause.

Many factors led them to choose the Presbyterian Church as their target. Too many to discuss here. Suffice it to say, if God wants this group of Christians to survive as a denomination, it will, and if other non-christians take it over completely it will also be his will. Trust him and wait and see. (which is not to say "let them do what they please unopposed")

50 posted on 06/17/2003 7:53:27 PM PDT by Protagoras (Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: HatSteel
I respectfully disagree.
51 posted on 06/17/2003 7:54:23 PM PDT by ohioWfan (BUSH 2004!!!! Leadership, Integrity, Morality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
Things usually do work when we do them God's way.

I'm reading between the lines that you're a fireball, like my dear bride. ;-)

MM

52 posted on 06/17/2003 8:03:41 PM PDT by MississippiMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: ianincali
Take that up with God. He set the rules.
53 posted on 06/17/2003 8:18:51 PM PDT by irishtenor (Red Green is my hero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Zipporah
Coral Ridge is PCA.
54 posted on 06/17/2003 8:22:56 PM PDT by irishtenor (Red Green is my hero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock; HatSteel
There are a couple of Korean Presbyterian denominations in the US, and I think there are a few small minor Anglo ones that you missed.

55 posted on 06/17/2003 9:08:05 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: irishtenor
See 1Tim.2:11-14, and 1 Cor.14:33-35.
56 posted on 06/17/2003 10:46:54 PM PDT by irishtenor (Red Green is my hero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: HatSteel
one for the good guys.
57 posted on 06/17/2003 11:40:46 PM PDT by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
I appreciate the respectful disagreement. Too many around here begin to flame others when they disagree. You've been more than polite. It's refreshing. Allow me to repeat the basis of my point. The no-female elder position is a very valid Biblical position. It is far easier to demonstrate biblically. Therefore, (and here's the point) we are wrong if we attack those who have this position FROM THE STANDPOINT that their position is WRONG. We can only disagree with it; we cannot claim it to be wrong. 1. It is the historic position. 2. It is easily demonstrated biblically. 3. There is no biblical example of a female elder.
58 posted on 06/18/2003 5:25:56 AM PDT by HatSteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

Comment #59 Removed by Moderator

To: HatSteel
PCUSA ministers are not member of their own churches.
60 posted on 06/18/2003 5:37:59 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-196 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson