1 posted on
06/16/2003 8:17:10 PM PDT by
HAL9000
To: HAL9000
In a 47-page decision, Howard wrote that Tucker failed to show a reason to set aside the sentence but even if he had provided evidence to back his claim, "it would not in the least have changed the outcome of the trial.'' Gotta love it!
2 posted on
06/16/2003 8:21:22 PM PDT by
PhiKapMom
(Bush Cheney '04 - VICTORY IN '04 -- $4 for '04 - www.GeorgeWBush.com/donate/)
To: HAL9000
18 months home detention. I'm deeply saddened for the poor guy.
Article doesn't say who appointed the judge. Must not have been a Republican President.
3 posted on
06/16/2003 8:28:45 PM PDT by
Clinging Bitterly
(Tagline error. Press ALT-F4 to continue.)
To: HAL9000
5 posted on
06/16/2003 8:38:21 PM PDT by
RJayneJ
(To nominate a Quote of the Day rjaynej@freerepublic.com or put my screen name in the To: line.)
To: HAL9000
Wait a minute, this isn't possible. Someone was CONVICTED in a case involving Whitewater? But just last week, Hillary Clinton told Barbara Walters that the entire Whitewater probe never turned up any wrongdoing. She's the most brilliant woman on Earth, so she couldn't possibly have been incorrect. And Hillary would never lie, would she? 'Tis a puzzlement...
7 posted on
06/16/2003 9:09:57 PM PDT by
HHFi
To: HAL9000
Barbara Walters and Larry King are probably trying even as we speak to get Mrs. Clitoon back on their programs in order to grill her with hard hitting questions about this topic. >/sarcasm<
8 posted on
06/16/2003 10:06:21 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(Socialism is slavery.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
