Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Proposal would change native-born requirement for presidency
www.globe.com ^ | 06/13/03 | Associated Press

Posted on 06/16/2003 6:21:49 AM PDT by bedolido

LITTLE ROCK (AP) U.S. Rep. Vic Snyder and Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., two other House members are proposing a constitutional amendment that allows a person born in another country to become president or vice president of the United States.

The proposal, introduced Wednesday, would allow individuals to hold the executive positions, regardless of where they were born, if they have been a U.S. citizen for at least 35 years.

Reps. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., is also sponsoring the measure.

The Constitution now limits the presidency and vice presidency to native-born Americans.

''This is a real issue for some people who are politically active and successful, but the American people cannot consider them to be president even though they have been U.S. citizens for 35 years,'' said Snyder, D-Ark.

Snyder pointed to people like former U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, born in the former Czechoslovakia, and U.S. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Mel Martinez, born in Cuba.

''The great dream of American children is 'someday, when I grow up, I can be president,''' Snyder said.

He said the natural-born citizen requirement precludes children like his Korean-born niece, who was adopted by his sister at age 6 months, from aspiring to the presidency.

Current qualifications for the presidency also include that they be 35 years old or older and a resident of the United States for at least 14 years. The 12th Amendment requires the vice president to meet the same requirements.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: foreignborn; nativeborn; presidency; requirement
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

1 posted on 06/16/2003 6:21:49 AM PDT by bedolido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bedolido
Might as well allow illegals to run too. That would suit the dems just fine!
2 posted on 06/16/2003 6:22:56 AM PDT by OldFriend (Hilary Knew)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
No way. That opens the door for communists like Gov. Jennifer Granholm from Michigan.
3 posted on 06/16/2003 6:23:15 AM PDT by rintense (Thank you to all our brave soldiers, past and present, for your faithful service to our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
Seems quite reasonable, but I think I'll be unreasonable and say no.
4 posted on 06/16/2003 6:24:18 AM PDT by RJCogburn (Yes, I will call it bold talk for a......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rintense
Using Maddy as an example of the deprived is a sure way of tanking this idea.
5 posted on 06/16/2003 6:25:38 AM PDT by Iowa Granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Iowa Granny
Many sheeples would fall for it though.
6 posted on 06/16/2003 6:26:40 AM PDT by rintense (Thank you to all our brave soldiers, past and present, for your faithful service to our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
Opens the door for an Islamic dictator too. Or a foreign-born United Nations quisling.
7 posted on 06/16/2003 6:29:13 AM PDT by Loyalist (Keeper of the Schismatic Orc Ping List. Freepmail me if you want on or off it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
I think I'll be unreasonable and say no.

I think you're mistaking Barney Frank for someone who gives a damn about what you think.

It's nice that things are going so well that BF can spend time on this.
You KNOW that they're not doing this without someone in particular in mind... What who THAT is?
Chirac? Blair? Hussein? Chretien?

8 posted on 06/16/2003 6:29:14 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
I suppose they'd include this with motor-voter and anybody from anywhere could go to the polls.
9 posted on 06/16/2003 6:31:23 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
Great, take an 'absolute' and amend that to legal resident for 35 years. Then the 35 sounds harsh, so we lower it to 5, then we say that they just have to be 'legal'; and for what purpose?? Do they want to have Arnold Swartzenegar run for president, and are just clearing the way?? Personally, I see no need to change the Counstitution.
10 posted on 06/16/2003 6:31:27 AM PDT by Hodar (With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
It will never happen.
11 posted on 06/16/2003 6:32:02 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
Let's all hold our breath until this happens....
12 posted on 06/16/2003 6:33:44 AM PDT by wimpycat ('Nemo me impune lacessit')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
While this may be popular in the liberal northeast and Californication, it will be about as well received as a turd in a punchbowl in 'flyover country'.
13 posted on 06/16/2003 6:34:52 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
Just another attempt to make it much easier for the UN to eventually take over the world.

14 posted on 06/16/2003 6:35:15 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loyalist
Hell, the Rats would vote for Mao or Stalin if he were the Rat on the ticket.
15 posted on 06/16/2003 6:36:15 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
Do you know what it takes for a constitutional amendment? Not only passing the senate and house but radification by 2/3 's of the states.... that is why we have so many "proposed" amendments to the constitution and so few actual. Don't lose sleep on this one.
16 posted on 06/16/2003 6:36:22 AM PDT by Walkingfeather (C)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
To change an amendment to the constitution it take 2/3's of the senate, plus to be radified, 2/3's of the state. It'll never happen.
17 posted on 06/16/2003 6:36:23 AM PDT by bedolido (Where'd I put that Tin-Foil Hat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
Opens the door for Arnold Schwarzenegger?
18 posted on 06/16/2003 6:39:19 AM PDT by Fraulein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
This is the Granholm amendment. The Rats need a big celebrity or lovable type to win since they have nothing else to offer. Granholm was born in Canuckistan.
19 posted on 06/16/2003 6:44:25 AM PDT by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bedolido
OK. Lets attach to that a requirement that any child born of non-citizens is not automatically a citizen when they are born in the US. In addition require that parents and child immediately leave the country or forever be barred from citizenship.
20 posted on 06/16/2003 6:44:28 AM PDT by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson