Skip to comments.
Grasshoppers invade U.S. West
Drudge ^
| June 13, 2003
| Drudge Report
Posted on 06/13/2003 6:58:00 PM PDT by Gophack
Grasshoppers invade U.S. West FRI Jun 13 2003 20:50:27 ET
San Francisco (dpa) - Huge swarms of hungry grasshoppers have invaded the western United States, prompting agricultural experts to warn of damage unparalleled in decades.
The plague has hit the states of Nevada, Utah and Idaho particularly hard and shows no sign of abating.
``This is bigger then anything we've seen in a long time,'' said expert Mike Cooper, quoted in ``The Idaho Statesman''.
Cooper cited records showing the current swarms to be the largest since World War II. Officials in Idaho have posted warning signs near highways warning of slippery conditions if the crickets swarm on the road.
In Utah, authorities predict that 2.5 million hectares could be devoured by the invading swarms. Authorities are hoping to use insecticide to prevent the situation's getting out of hand, but environmental groups have filed four law suits hoping to block the spraying.
TOPICS: Front Page News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agriculture; environment; pesticide
but environmental groups have filed four law suits hoping to block the spraying. Damn liberals.
1
posted on
06/13/2003 6:58:00 PM PDT
by
Gophack
To: ElkGroveDan
ping
2
posted on
06/13/2003 6:58:24 PM PDT
by
Gophack
To: Gophack
OK, so we got locusts,
frogs,
livestock disease,
hail....
If someone is keeping Jews in bondage out there, please let them go before the lice, OK?
To: Gophack
I read this on Drudge and had to laugh. Since when were grasshoppers becoming extinct, anyway?
4
posted on
06/13/2003 7:09:12 PM PDT
by
rs79bm
(The difference between Los Angeles and yogurt is that yogurt comes with less fruit ... R. Limbaugh)
To: rs79bm
The enviro-nazis think that pesticides in and of themselves are bad, not that they have any love for grasshoppers. They would rather 90% of the crops die and farmers lose their land before admitting that pesticides are comparatively harmless. (no food versus 1 out of 1,000,000 people getting cancer, or some such.)
5
posted on
06/13/2003 7:37:15 PM PDT
by
Gophack
To: Gophack
Quick cure for any grasshopper problems you might have - get some chickens. Mine get so fat on the bountiful supply of hoppers around here that they can hardly walk or cluck.
6
posted on
06/13/2003 7:40:19 PM PDT
by
strela
("Have Word Processor, Will Travel" reads the card of a man ...)
To: Gophack
Spray the insects, and the liberals.
7
posted on
06/13/2003 8:01:28 PM PDT
by
Duramaximus
( American Born, Gun_Toting , Aerospace Worker Living In A State That Worships Socialism)
Comment #8 Removed by Moderator
To: The Hon. Galahad Threepwood
}If someone is keeping Jews in bondage out there, please let them go before the lice, OK?
A very funny line! But there were no Jews in bondage (in Egypt), only Israelites.
9
posted on
06/13/2003 8:48:16 PM PDT
by
DensaMensa
(He who controls the definitions controls History. He who controls History controls the future.)
To: DensaMensa
We are all going to die...
I hear locust dipped in chocolate are very nice...
10
posted on
06/13/2003 9:10:43 PM PDT
by
Flavius
(I)
To: Gophack
If seagulls miraculously appear and gobble up the horde of marauding hoppers will the ACLU sue the Mormons?
To: NewRomeTacitus
Today, anything is possible. {ggg}.
12
posted on
06/13/2003 9:27:55 PM PDT
by
DensaMensa
(He who controls the definitions controls History. He who controls History controls the future.)
To: Gophack
"Authorities are hoping to use insecticide to prevent the situation's getting out of hand, but environmental groups have filed four law suits hoping to block the spraying." Can you say a $3 head of lettuce or a $1 baked potato?
Wonder if any of those tree huggers eat salads?
13
posted on
06/14/2003 9:28:07 AM PDT
by
Happy2BMe
(LIBERTY has arrived in Iraq - Now we can concentrate on HOLLYWEED!)
To: DensaMensa
A matter of semantics..
To: sheik yerbouty
A matter of semantics..
Not at all. Unless history revisionism is the objective, the definitions are quite clear.
There were no "Jews" until the small remnant of the 3 tribes which made up the Southern Kingdom of Israel returned from Babylonian captivity. That was around 500 BC, and nearly a thousand years after Moses and the 12 tribes of Israelites did their thing in Egypt. The members of the larger "10 tribes" of Israel which made up the Northern Kingdom were never called Jews.
Therefore, Moses, David and the 5 Million others before the Davidic Kingdom split were not Jews, just plain old Israelites.
15
posted on
06/14/2003 12:57:18 PM PDT
by
DensaMensa
(He who controls the definitions controls History. He who controls History controls the future.)
To: The Hon. Galahad Threepwood
16
posted on
06/14/2003 12:59:21 PM PDT
by
HairOfTheDog
(Not all those who wander are lost)
To: DensaMensa
Whatever...
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson