Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Homosexual Rape and Murder of Children
Journal of the Family Research Institute

Posted on 06/08/2003 8:38:06 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks

The homosexual historical footprint is large when it comes to the rape and murder of children. The most notorious child killer might be Gilles de Rais (Bluebeard), remembered for raping, torturing, and killing perhaps 800 boys in 15th century France. Gilles often raped the boy as he hung from a hook by the neck. Before he died, Gilles took him down, comforted him, repeated the act and either killed him himself or had him slain. In his confession, Gilles testified that “when the children were dead he kissed them and those who had the most handsome limbs and heads he held up to admire them, and had their bodies cut open and took delight at the sight of their inner organs; and very often when the said children were dying he sat on their stomachs and took pleasure in seeing them die and laughed...”

At the turn of the 19th century, “hobos” or “bums” in the U.S. were often driven from towns because it was believed that they were responsible for raping and killing boys. Even the murder of a boy by homosexual lovers Leopold and Loeb in 1924, then called the “crime of the century,” likely involved rape. As of July 23, 2001, the Associated Press list of the worst serial killers in the United States was topped by Donald Harvey, followed by John Wayne Gacy, Patrick Kearney, Bruce Davis and Dean Corll in descending number of victims (www.crimelibrary.com). All these perpetrators of serial crimes in the 1970s and 1980s engaged in homosexuality, and the majority of the victims for the last four killers were boys.

Nevertheless, girls get raped and murdered too. Homosexual activists would have us believe that heterosexual abductions are far more common than homosexual child molestations. Perhaps our society has been so slanted against homosexuality that homosexuals are themselves victims of biased historical reporting. If so, what is the situation today? With our modern professional class Ñ including the media Ñ generally in favor of gay rights, it would seem likely that there ought to be minimal reporting bias against homosexuals in the coverage of child molestation cases. So the question remains: are those who engage in homosexuality disproportionately apt to engage in the rape and murder of children?

What We Did
Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe, an on-line search service, scans the whole text of over 50 English regional and national newspapers, largely in the U.S., but also including major papers in Australia, England, Canada, and New Zealand (e.g., the Baltimore Sun, Boston Globe, Independent [London], Ottawa Citizen, etc.). For 1989 through 2002 inclusive, every news story that included “child molestation” was examined Ñ a total of 6,444 stories which, after eliminating repeat stories about the same cases, reduced to 1,914 unique child molestation events. The 6,444 story database was double-checked by running “murder” and “killed” against it. Only news stories were tallied, not editorials or opinion pieces, so these were stories of fairly recent events.

What We Found
One hundred and three news stories involved the rape and/or murder of children: 90 involved the molestation and murder of a child or children, 11 stories involved only the abduction and rape of children, and two the rape and mutilation, but not the murder, of the children involved. Of the 90 news stories where the child was raped and murdered (0.47% of the unique child molestation stories), 40% involved homosexual molestation.

In the most unusual case, an “educated and relatively wealthy” leader recruited two other men and a boy. This team raped and murdered precisely 100 boys1. The leader had had prior arrests for suspicion of sodomizing boys, but his social status kept him from being convicted for many years. In another case, a man molested and killed 9 children of unreported sex.

Of the 95 perpetrators in these 90 stories, at least 43% engaged in homosexuality. These included 39 men, a boy, and a woman who all engaged in homosexuality, and 47 men and 7 boys who engaged in heterosexuality with victims. Of the 217 victims, at least 68% were victimized by homosexual perpetrators, and at least 67% were boys. Boys were also mutilated in the two stories involving mutilation. Furthermore, both multiple perpetrators and multiple victims were associated with homosexuality. In the three stories where two or more killers were implicated, the rapes were homosexual. In 69% of the 13 stories involving more than one victim, the perpetrator engaged in homosexuality. Another 11 stories involved a charge of attempted murder. In 64% of those cases, the perpetrator engaged in homosexuality.

When all other cases of child molestation from the Lexis-Nexis search are added to these stories, there were 2,181 perpetrators in the 1,914 distinct events whose sexual proclivities could be characterized by the sex of their victim: 41% engaged in sex with their own sex, the remaining 59% with the opposite sex (another 118 perpetrators violated at least 190 children whose sex was not given). Of the 5,630 underage victims of these molestations, 61% were victimized by individuals who engaged in homosexuality. And those who performed homosexual seductions were quite one-sided: 3,386 of their victims were boys, only 60 were girls.

Overall, there was a slightly higher rate of homosexuality among perpetrators who raped and killed than among those who “merely” raped or molested (43% vs. 41%). In addition, the proportion of victims attributed to homosexual perpetrators who raped and murdered was higher than the proportion attributed to homosexuals who only raped or molested (68% vs. 61%). All of the cases involving eating or torturing the victim were committed by homosexual practitioners.

What the Findings Mean
The newspapers indexed by Academic Universe undoubtedly concentrate upon events that occur in urban areas. Nonetheless, since the rape and murder of a child is of such widespread interest, a considerable proportion of such events outside of urban areas were probably also cited in these newspapers. It may even be true that the proportions of perpetrators and victims in this sample are roughly representative of what has recently happened in the industrialized world. Contrary to the claims of homosexual activists, history seems to have repeated itself. The past 14 years give every indication that those who engage in homosexuality are still disproportionately involved in the rapes and murders of children. Likewise, the few instances of mutilation also implicated homosexuals. The historical record disproportionately implicating homosexuals in the rape, torture, and murder of children appears to be in harmony with more recent events.

Murder and child molestation combine in the rape and murder of a child. These two social problems are also independently associated with those who engage in homosexuality. Blanchard, Barbaree, Bogaert, Dicky, Klassen, Kuban, and Zucker, working with male offenders, concluded in 2000 that2 the “best epidemiological evidence indicates that only 2-4% of men attracted to adults prefer menÉ; in contrast, around 25-40% of men attracted to children prefer boys.... Thus the rate of homosexual attraction is 6-20 times higher among pedophiles [those who have sex with children under the age of 12 yr.]” (p. 464).

Likewise, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual III-R (DSM III-R, 1987)3 of the American Psychiatric Association, summarizing the clinical material about men, states that “Attraction to girls [aged 13 yr. or younger] is apparently twice as common as attraction to boys” and notes that the “course is usually chronic, especially in those attracted to boys.... The recidivism rate for people with Pedophilia involving a preference for the same sex is roughly twice that of those who prefer the opposite sex” (pp. 284-5).

Both of these sources estimated that about a third of child molesters engage in homosexuality Ñ similar to the 41% of male perpetrators who ‘only’ raped the underage in the newspaper database. In other studies4, it has also been found that male perpetrators who engage in homosexuality claim larger numbers of rape victims than non-homosexual rapists. For instance, 84% of the 28,574 children under the age of 14 who were raped in Abel, et al. were victimized by homosexuals. Also, the higher rates of recidivism by homosexuals noted in the DSM would imply more victims too.

In line with these reports, of the 217 victims in the 90 murder and rape stories, at least 68% were victimized by homosexual perpetrators. This 68% falls between the estimate that “roughly equal numbers of girls and boys, each year fall victim to some form of sexual exploitation” cited in a recent National Association of Social Workers review of a large set of studies of child molestation5 and the 84% reported by Abel, et al.

Murder also appears to be disproportionately associated with homosexuality. Jim Warren did the intake interview for almost all younger murderers (i.e., those under age 36) at the Washington State Corrections Center from 1971-82. In an interview in 1994, Warren opined that he was “probably the only one who examined the entirety of each of their case files.” Warren said that he was struck with how frequently homosexuality turned up in the cases. Starting with a trickle of 2 or 3 murders/year in 1972 until dozens/year by the early 1980s, he noted a recurrent pattern: Although the motive listed in the report was often robbery or theft, he said that “about 50% of the time” it was associated with homosexuality. Typically, he said, a homosexual would meet someone at a bar or park and invite him to his home. Eventually, an argument would ensue and he or his visitor would be dead.

In Amsterdam, police spokesmen have stated that in “one out of four of all murder cases the victim was homosexual” (quoted by Gemert, 1994, p. 150)6. Gemert opined that “[e]lderly homosexual men often don’t have much to do in daily life. When they know that they will be unwanted in the gay world in the future, they will... seek this form of excitement. Visiting Central Station and ‘hunting’ boys is very important to them” (p. 172). Gemert thus offers a theory about the linkage between child molestation, murder and homosexuality Ñ albeit, one that accounts for the high rate at which homosexuals are murdered by boys, not why they in turn disproportionately rape and murder boys.

Although murder and rape of children are not common events, they are extremely frightening and can greatly impact the communities in which they occur. As its most precious resource, our society takes great pains to protect children and to ensure their safety. Amazingly, our society is also at the vanguard of the pro-gay rights movement. But consider: a group constituting perhaps 1% to 5% of men (1.3% in the 1996 National Household Survey of Drug Abuse; higher in Black, et al.7, Anderson & Stall8, and Cameron & Cameron9) generated 43% of those who were recorded in the most recent 14 years of news stories as having raped and killed children. That this group also accounts for around a third of child molesters, commits between a third to two-thirds of child rapes, and may be involved in up to half of all murders, adds substance to the traditional belief that participation in homosexual activity is anti-social.

References:

1. Popham, P. (2000) Child killer sentenced to be throttled, cut up and immersed in an acid bath. Independent [London, England] 3/17/00.
2. Blanchard, R., Barbaree, H. E., Bogaert, A. F., Dicky, R., Klassen, P., Kuban, M. E., Zucker, K. J. (2000) Fraternal birth order and sexual orientation in pedophiles. Archives of Sexual Behavior 29, 463-478.
3. American Psychiatric Association. (1987) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual III-R. Washington, D.C.
4. Abel, G. G., Becker, J. V., Mittelman, M., Cunningham-Rathner, J., Bouleau, J. L., & Murphy, W. D. (1987) Self-reported sex crimes of nonincarcerated paraphiliacs. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2 (1), 3-25.
5. Houston Chronicle (9/26/01) Define child sex abuse to combat problem. Editorial.
6. Gemert, F. van. (1994) Chicken kills hawk: gay murders during the eighties in Amsterdam. Journal of Homosexuality. 26(4), 149-174.
7. Black, D., Gates, G., Sanders, S. & Taylor, L. (2000) Demographics of the gay and lesbian population in the United States: evidence from available systematic data sources. Demography. 37, 139-154.
8. Anderson, J. E. & Stall, R. (2002) Increased reporting of male-to-male sexual activity in a national survey. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 29, 643-646.
9. Cameron, P. & Cameron, K. (2002) What proportion of heterosexuals is ex-homosexual? Psychological Reports 91, 1087-1097.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: bluebeard; childmolestors; gay; homosexual; homosexualagenda; johnwaynegacy; murders; prisoners; rape; rapists; serialkillers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 next last
To: Dataman
LOL !!
61 posted on 06/09/2003 12:49:30 AM PDT by BagCamAddict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
Either that, or the study shows the higher rate at which homosexuals are caught/prosecuted for such crimes. Whereas heterosexual child molestors may go un-caught forever. Not to mention how many male family members (fathers, brothers, uncles) or family friends molest little girls... most of which go unnoticed and unprosecuted.

It is a fact of human nature that more effort goes into solving crimes that are "more offensive" to people. So particularly heinous crimes are given more attention -- note the extra (even extreme) attention paid to the Laci Peterson case, compared to the THREE other cases in that same area where a pregnant woman was murdered late in her pregnancy. But Laci Peterson was an attractive white woman, whereas the other murdered pregnant women were either not white or not attractive. Since most people consider homosexual child molestation to be more offensive than heterosexual child molestation, I would imagine the perpetrators are "hunted down" more diligently and more successfully as compared with heterosexual child molestors.

(I don't know how anyone can say that homo or hetero child molestation is more or less offensive than the other - ALL child molestation is offensive to me, whether homo or hetero.)
62 posted on 06/09/2003 1:01:08 AM PDT by BagCamAddict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Agape
Our society is very oppressive to gays. I'm not saying that is right or wrong, but I would think that would cause some psychological damage

Society is oppressive to child molesters and advocates of murder too. That isn't a bad thing. Homosexuals can and have carry on in secret without penalty but when they try to recruit, molest, and impose their valueless behavior on everyone else, society should react.

I suspect some of the mental damage was already there since the overwhelming majority of gays studied have been found to either have been molested as children or have a milquetoast (or absent) father and a dominant mother.

63 posted on 06/09/2003 6:07:08 AM PDT by Dataman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

Comment #64 Removed by Moderator

Comment #65 Removed by Moderator

Comment #66 Removed by Moderator

Comment #67 Removed by Moderator

To: Clint N. Suhks; longtermmemmory; scripter; All
"It should also be noted that female on female abuse exists but because it is under reported it does not hit these academic search studies."

"Are you familiar with Butterfly Kisses, the lesbian version of NAMBLA? Their web site moves often but this link has snap shots of some of the pages, it’s real sick stuff."


Also documented in the thread "Meet 'Women's Auxiliary of NAMBLA'"

68 posted on 06/09/2003 6:27:05 AM PDT by EdReform (Support Free Republic - Become a Monthly Donor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #69 Removed by Moderator

To: breakem
Once again, we're seeing a thread dominated by those that can't separate the "homosexual agenda" from individuals. These people go nuts when the media labels abortion clinic bombers as "Christians", but they have no problem labelling all homosexuals as degenerate filth in one swoop.
70 posted on 06/09/2003 6:34:41 AM PDT by LanPB01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: EdReform
Thanks for the reminder about NAWGLA. That thread deserves to be pinged more often.
71 posted on 06/09/2003 7:18:17 AM PDT by scripter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: breakem
Let's see, if homos rape kids at a higher percentage it's because they are pathological (thanks Dr.), but if men murder at a higher rate there is no pathology Wow!

No Einstein, men don’t murder because they are men, hehehe…but maybe you can cite the research studies that prove your “theory”.

72 posted on 06/09/2003 7:19:11 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
Most murderers are bipeds.

That's a good point. Let's follow the logic of some:

But if you're a biped, maybe you should be once 'group libel' becomes the norm. Guilty until proven innocent.
</sarcasm>

Thanks for the insight here and on other threads. We need more folks like you speaking out on this issue.

73 posted on 06/09/2003 7:25:06 AM PDT by scripter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: jlogajan
Yes, but the incidence of male initiated rape is much higher than that of female initiated rape. So by your logic we should conclude that MALES are flawed and should be shunned, punished, or destroyed. Why don't you follow your own logic consistently????

You’re comparing apples and cow pies. Homosexual pathology is a link that causes an increased rate to offend, being a male is NOT pathology and therefor you can’t compare it as reasoning for offenses against women. Logic requires a consistent measure. Nice try though, thanks for playing.

74 posted on 06/09/2003 7:30:10 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: BagCamAddict
Since most people consider homosexual child molestation to be more offensive than heterosexual child molestation, I would imagine the perpetrators are "hunted down" more diligently and more successfully as compared with heterosexual child molestors.

That’s not really a credible argument given that child molestation is in its self a heinous crime regardless of who does it. You confirm this in your next statement. “(I don't know how anyone can say that homo or hetero child molestation is more or less offensive than the other - ALL child molestation is offensive to me, whether homo or hetero.)”

75 posted on 06/09/2003 7:38:49 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Gordon; Clint N. Suhks; *Homosexual Agenda; GrandMoM; backhoe; pram; Yehuda; saradippity; ...
When I first went to the link [Clint N. Suhks] provided, I was skeptical about the authenticity of the references. After a little searching and hacking I found the actual female childlove site...

Thanks for finding the new location. In post 68 of this thread you can find a link to the site when we first found it.

76 posted on 06/09/2003 7:40:57 AM PDT by scripter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: LanPB01
Once again, we're seeing a thread dominated by those that can't separate the "homosexual agenda" from individuals.

Actually we’re talking about a research study.

These people go nuts when the media labels abortion clinic bombers as "Christians", but they have no problem labelling all homosexuals as degenerate filth in one swoop.

Last time I looked being a Christian is not a behavioral pathology linked to abortion clinic bombers, if you have any research proving your theory I’d be interested.

77 posted on 06/09/2003 7:48:47 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Gordon
Goos job!
78 posted on 06/09/2003 7:52:35 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
Girl Scouts Attacked for Inclusion of Lesbians and Gays By June B. Mire, Ph.D.

A group from the religious right called the American Family Association, based in Tupelo Mississippi, is attacking the Girl Scouts because that organization refuses to discriminate against lesbians and gays.

Unlike the Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts has always been inclusive. All girls are welcome in Girls Scouts, not just the pretty ones or the popular ones or the skinny ones or the ones with traditional families or the straight ones. Inclusive means just that.

In the mid-90s, the organization went on the public record with a statement to the Associated Press that said it does not discriminate based on sexual orientation.

A few months ago, the Girl Scout national president, Connie Matsui, made favorable remarks about a video called "That's A Family," which positively depicts lesbian and gay family groups. (Ms. Matsui attended a screening at The White House during the final days of the Clinton Administration.)

The bigots at the American Family Association have sent 10,000 letters of protest to the national Girl Scout organization, demanding that Ms. Matsui retract her statement and/or resign.

In contrast, the Girl Scouts have received only 5 -- that's right, five --letters of support. Please write to Ms. Matsui and let her know that you appreciate the Girl Scouts' stand on behalf of diversity. And please forward this message to all of your friends.

Send messages to cmatsui@girlscouts.org

Important to note this directive:

It's important that the Girl Scouts hear from us, since they are beginning to equivocate on their stand. Let them know that they are doing the right thing. -----------------------------------------------------------

79 posted on 06/09/2003 8:11:11 AM PDT by JesseHousman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: breakem
I tire easilly of you.

Then for goodness sake take a hike.

80 posted on 06/09/2003 8:19:33 AM PDT by JesseHousman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson