To: JohnHuang2
Yaaaaaahooooooo!
2 posted on
06/06/2003 11:56:33 PM PDT by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: JohnHuang2
Islamic law has exceptions that allow women to expose their faces if it serves a public good... Leaving a burning building, however, is not one of these exceptions.
3 posted on
06/07/2003 12:18:56 AM PDT by
struwwelpeter
(Ukrainian vodka = gorilka (aka 'little gorilla'))
To: JohnHuang2
It's a beginning.
5 posted on
06/07/2003 2:41:18 AM PDT by
holyh2o
To: JohnHuang2
I have heard that she has a rap sheet from her days in the Florida panhandle which includes a felony conviction. Anyone have a line on this?
6 posted on
06/07/2003 2:52:54 AM PDT by
Banjoguy
(To our citizen and volunteer military: Thanks for all you've done...)
To: JohnHuang2
Maybe she should have researched her religion a bit before going to court?
7 posted on
06/07/2003 3:00:53 AM PDT by
R. Scott
To: JohnHuang2
"Freeman, a convert to Islam previously known as Sandra Kellar, started wearing a veil in 1997. She had a mug shot taken without the veil after her arrest in Illinois in 1998 on a domestic battery charge involving one of twin 3-year-old sisters who were in her foster care.
Child welfare workers told investigators that Freeman and her husband had used their concerns about religious modesty to hinder them from looking for bruises on the girls, according to the police records. The girls were removed from the home." ....USAToday
8 posted on
06/07/2003 3:05:21 AM PDT by
Banjoguy
(To our citizen and volunteer military: Thanks for all you've done...)
To: JohnHuang2
Mrs. Freeman's lawyers argued that instead of a driver's license photo, she could use other documents such as a birth certificate or Social Security card to prove her identity.
And which one of those other ones has a photo on it?
She had a mug shot taken without the veil after her arrest
And the real reason comes out.
9 posted on
06/07/2003 8:36:33 AM PDT by
lelio
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson