Skip to comments.
DNC and Schwarzenegger have dirt file on Condoleezza (Condi) Rice?
Washington Post ^
| 6-4-03
| Lloyd Grove
Posted on 06/06/2003 8:47:46 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
To: GraniteStateConservative
re: They're waiting for us to draw our Condi )))
Ever known a lib to show restraint? Play their cards with patience and wisdom?
I'm dubious about this claim for dirt.
21
posted on
06/06/2003 9:11:04 AM PDT
by
Mamzelle
To: alnick
Yes, I learned of this from that thread. I made a separate thread because I thought they were needed.
22
posted on
06/06/2003 9:11:36 AM PDT
by
GraniteStateConservative
(Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
To: OpusatFR
"The liberals are in meltdown mode over Martha Stewart and the usual mantra of ~powerful, competent woman is victim of patriarchal powers~ ..." The liberals???
This is all I hear out of Rush Limbaugh nowadays. Has he gone over?
To: demlosers
How does the DNC know this? Did Ahhnoold tell them? Yeah right I agree. The DNC is making this up - trying to kill two birds with one smear - Condi AND Arnold.
To: GraniteStateConservative
Since when did the Dimwits become so concerned about a candidate's skeletons in the closet? Bottom line. The CA Dimwits had better figure out who they are going to run in the Davis Recall election besides the moron Davis. The CA Dimwits only wish they had a candidate to run as good as Rice. The Dimwit seven dwarfs that are running for POUS couldn't hold a candle to Rice or Bush. DUMP DAVIS in '03. And KNOCKOUT BOXER in '04.
25
posted on
06/06/2003 9:26:42 AM PDT
by
kellynla
("C" 1/5 1st Mar Div Viet Nam '69 & '70 Semper Fi)
To: alnick
the best-selling author's juiciest targets. The speculation includes [...] and Republicans Patrick Buchanan, Steve Forbes and John McCain [...]No neocons (Forbes?). No solace for the go-pat-go'ers.
26
posted on
06/06/2003 9:30:16 AM PDT
by
Stultis
To: GraniteStateConservative
Heard Loretta Sanchez spewing all kinds of dirt on Arnold. Said he was a wife beater and a big time cheater on his wife.
The dems are experts at dirt that's for sure. They seem happiest when in the sewer.
27
posted on
06/06/2003 9:31:38 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(without the brave, there would be no land of the free)
To: hobbes1
IMHO, Arnold would not dig up dirt on Condi (although if he were competing against her on stage he would hide her posing trunks). Do you think this sounds like him or is it just the rats up to their normal game?
28
posted on
06/06/2003 9:32:14 AM PDT
by
MattinNJ
To: Miss Marple
Good point. How would the DNC even know what files Arnold has?
29
posted on
06/06/2003 9:44:43 AM PDT
by
My2Cents
("Well....there you go again.")
To: OldFriend
Heard Loretta Sanchez spewing all kinds of dirt on Arnold. Said he was a wife beater and a big time cheater on his wife.
I don't know about wife beater, but i've actually seen pictures of Arnold getting a little fresh with women who are not Maria Shriver. It would be easier for Condi to find dirt on Arnold than vice versa, i'd imagine. And don't kid yourself, dirt is a political thing, the Democrats don't have a monopoly on it.
To: MJY1288
Methinks they better stick to losing elections, they're much better at that. They win in California, and that is the venue at issue here.
31
posted on
06/06/2003 9:49:04 AM PDT
by
Carry_Okie
(California: Where government is pornography, every day!)
To: Egregious Philbin
Have to disagree, the dems are the party of Larry Flynt. Republicans don't need to dig dirt, they have a wonderful record on which to run.
32
posted on
06/06/2003 9:52:59 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(without the brave, there would be no land of the free)
To: BlueOneGolf
You don't have to register, it just asks for sex, age, and zip code, just entire some baloney. At their site I am a 103 year old from Cobb County, GA.
To: mabelkitty
Arnold has too much in his background.I know. But what's he gonna do about it now? It's already on DVD:
34
posted on
06/06/2003 9:54:04 AM PDT
by
Stultis
To: Miss Marple
Actually given the rumors of Arnold S.'s background, its quite likely that he has done some dirt digging on potential opponents in both parties, in order to try and prevent them from bringing up his past(MAD strategy). But your point is certainly a possibility, too.
To: GraniteStateConservative
I honestly don't think that Schwartzenegger could possibly afford to take a 15 million dollar a year pay cut from a cushy job as a mega movie star to take over the reigns of a bankrupt third-world state like California. What's in it for him, really?
To: Mamzelle
Ever known a lib to show restraint? Play their cards with patience and wisdom? Don't kid yourselves, they can be masters at this game.
For example, Bush's DWI story was quietly held until the week before the election.
To: Diddle E. Squat
I'm a 72-year-old Afghani woman.
38
posted on
06/06/2003 10:00:46 AM PDT
by
GraniteStateConservative
(Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
To: GraniteStateConservative
Under grilling by social critic Camille Paglia I am dubious of anything that comes out of Camille Paglia's mouth.
To: Diddle E. Squat
Until the Thursday before the election-- right when you want it to hit.
40
posted on
06/06/2003 10:01:38 AM PDT
by
GraniteStateConservative
(Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson