Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Abortion Supporters Upset Over Fetal Rights Legislation
Seamax ^ | 6/2/2003 | Fr. Michael Reilly

Posted on 06/03/2003 4:36:37 AM PDT by Hugenot

Newsweek's cover story on Fetal Rights for the June 9 issue is already causing quite a stir among abortion supporters.

A Newsweek Poll shows that 46% of Americans believe that life begins at conception, while an additional 12% believes that it begins at implantation. Only 11% believe that life begins at birth, which means that 89% of Americans would acknowledge that the present abortion laws allow for at least some legalization of murder.

The Laci Peterson story has popularized the question of fetal rights, since Scott Peterson has been charged with two murders, and the Unborn Victims of Violence Act, which has passed the House, is being referred to as the Laci and Conner Law.

The law would inflict penalties on those who harm "a child in utero" while committing a federal crime. While the bill is expected to pass the Senate, defenders argue that it will not impact abortion because the law protects children that are wanted by the mother.

Nevertheless, if we are acknowledging that the child in the womb is indeed a human being with rights, it's only a matter of time before the arbitrary distinction of wanted/unwanted crumbles.

Planned Parenthood president Gloria Feldt is quoted in Newsweek as complaining that, “If they are able to make fetuses people in law with the same standing as women and men, then Roe will be moot."

Meanwhile, Ken Connor, president of the antiabortion Family Research Council argues that, “It's not OK for the husband to kill his wife's child, but it's OK for the mother [to have an abortion]?”

National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League President Kate Michelman denounced the Laci and Conner Law as a "part of a larger strategy to establish the embryo with separate distinct rights equal to if not greater than the woman."

Try as they will, abortion supporters cannot get around a simple fact. Once society says that it's acceptable to take an innocent human life, all human life loses its sacredness.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Free Republic; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; feldt; fetalrights; michelman; naral; plannedparenthood
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last
To: Sonny M
I'm inclined to believe it will be the 'appeal' by Scott Peterson's lawyers to the double homicide conviction and death penalty that will lay bare the insidious wrong of the Roe and Doe decisions. But it is not likely that either of our predictions will come to pass ... 'stare decesis' covers the paradoxical asses of the jackasses on the high bench. Even when a 'landmark' case arose from lies and deceit (as Roe did, clearly), the court can ignore the specious to uphold their own error damn near for perpituity. Look how long the Dred Scott error stood!
41 posted on 06/04/2003 10:02:31 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

perpituity = perpetuity ... sheesh, what clumsy grey cells!
42 posted on 06/04/2003 10:04:23 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
Boo frikken hoo.

LOL! I like that one!

43 posted on 06/04/2003 10:06:02 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
I doubt it, the way Petersons lawyers are planning to phrase his indictement (forget conviction, they are already working on the indictment alone) is based on part of the 10 amendment and row vs wade combined.

Long story short, they are going to use parts of both arguements to hit at it.

The PBA ban is going to be the case that either keeps roe vs wade alive or overturns it. That was the real intent from the begining.

44 posted on 06/04/2003 11:21:32 PM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson