Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prosecutors want autopsy results unsealed
The Modesto Bee ^ | May 29 2003 | John Cote' and Garth Stapely

Posted on 05/30/2003 5:41:15 AM PDT by runningbear

Prosecutors want autopsy results unsealed

Prosecutors want autopsy results unsealed

By JOHN COTÉ and GARTH STAPLEY
BEE STAFF WRITERS

Published: May 29, 2003, 07:40:54 PM PDT

Prosecutors have reversed their position and are now asking a judge to unseal autopsy reports for Laci Peterson and her unborn son after details allegedly from one report were leaked to the media Thursday.

“The information being leaked has clearly been skewed in favor of the defense,” prosecution documents filed in court Thursday say. “The People cannot see why the autopsy documents should not be released.”

Defense attorney Mark Geragos strongly denied the leak came from his team. "I don’t know who they got the document from and I certainly didn’t want the document public," Geragos said.

The prosecutors’ shift on the autopsy reports came after NBC News reported they had obtained “a portion of the coroner’s report on the autopsy on the fetus.”

The document says the fetus was found with 1 1/2 loops of plastic tape around its neck and had a significant cut on its torso that had been inflicted after death, MSNBC reported on its Web site.

The information could be used to bolster a defense theory that Laci and her unborn child were slain in a ritualistic killing, possibly by Satanic cult members.

Stanislaus County Judge Al Girolami had ordered the autopsy reports tentatively sealed on May 15 at the request of prosecution and defense attorneys. He was scheduled to make a final decision on the sealing by today.

A statement released Thursday from the district attorney’s office says prosecutors “cannot verify the accuracy of any media statements concerning the contents of the autopsy reports without violating the court’s order.”

Senior Deputy District Attorney Dave Harris had argued in favor of sealing the documents at a Tuesday hearing, saying it was necessary to protect Scott Peterson’s right to a fair trial.

Charity Kenyon, an attorney representing a coalition of newspaper organizations, including The Bee, said during the hearing that the public’s right to view court documents was a fundamental component of a transparent legal system.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peterson D.A. wants autopsies released
Prosecutor appeals to judge after reports leaked

Peterson D.A. wants autopsies released
Prosecutor appeals to judge after reports leaked

Suzanne Herel, Chronicle Staff Writer Friday, May 30, 2003

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A frustrated Stanislaus County district attorney did an about-face Thursday and asked a judge to release autopsy reports on Laci Peterson and her unborn son, saying that leaks about the condition of the baby's body were "skewed in favor of the defense."

District Attorney Jim Brazelton stopped just short of accusing defense attorneys for Scott Peterson -- who have hinted that a satanic gang was responsible for killing Laci Peterson and the couple's unborn baby -- of leaking selected details from the autopsy. But in asking a judge to lift a seal on the document, Brazelton said prosecutors hadn't released the document, even to Modesto police or to Laci Peterson's family.

Brazelton filed court papers to make the autopsy public hours after the cable news outlet MSNBC reported that the unborn baby had been found with a loop and a half of plastic tape around his neck and that there was a "significant cut" on his torso inflicted after death.

"The information being leaked has clearly been skewed in favor of the defense," Brazelton, who originally had asked for the autopsies to be sealed, said in his motion Thursday. "By releasing the autopsy reports, the court will allow the media to see what the actual facts are, and then accurate information may be reported."

Superior Court Judge Al Girolami is scheduled to hear the motion June 6.

Mark Geragos, who is defending Scott Peterson on capital murder charges that he killed his wife and their unborn son, did not return phone calls to his office Thursday, but told the Associated Press that he would not comment on the reports.

Girolami "more than telegraphed that he does not want us commenting on the case" during a closed meeting in his chambers Tuesday, Geragos told the AP.

INFORMATION NOT CONFIRMED

The Contra Costa County Sheriff's Department, whose coroner conducted the autopsies, would not confirm or deny the information in the leaked report.

The bodies of Laci Peterson, 27, and her unborn son, whom the couple had planned to name Conner, were found in mid-April after washing ashore along the Richmond shoreline.

MSNBC, which did not say who had supplied.....

---------------------------------------------------------------

Grisly Questions

Grisly Questions

Autopsy Shows Badly Decomposed Laci Peterson

May 30— Laci Peterson's head and parts of her limbs were missing and plastic tape was wrapped around the neck of her child, according to the full autopsy and coroner's photographs exclusively seen by ABCNEWS.

According to the autopsy, the skin of the child was not decomposed at all, though the right side of his body was mutilated, and the placenta and umbilical cord were not found with the body.

The autopsy said that the cause of Laci Peterson's death was undetermined, and there was no evidence of man-made wounds, despite the fact that her head and all or part of her limbs were missing.

Peterson's body was so badly decomposed it barely looked like a body after it was found in San Francisco Bay last month. However, the autopsy report showed her cervix was intact.

Experts are divided over whether the new revelations about the condition of Laci Peterson's body and that of her child will help prosecutors or Scott Peterson's defense.

On Thursday, sources close to the investigation told ABCNEWS the sealed autopsy report indicated a piece of nylon tape was looped around the child's neck when it washed ashore last month, and that there was a laceration or tear on the tiny body.

There also was tape on Laci Peterson's lower torso, outside her clothing, when her body was found April 14, a day after her baby's remains were recovered, the sources said.

Forensic pathologist Dr. Michael Baden told Good Morning America that the limbs and head were probably removed before Laci was put in the water.

The grisly new details could fuel speculation as to whether the baby ever lived outside the womb, which defense attorneys could use to undermine the prosecution's case against Scott Peterson, Laci's husband and the father of the child they had planned to name Conner.

The prosecutors handling the case said Thursday that since the autopsy was starting to be leaked to the media, the whole report should be released.

"The information being leaked has clearly been skewed in favor of the defense," Deputy Stanislaus County, Calif., District Attorney David Harris wrote in a statement released late Thursday. "By releasing the autopsy reports the court will allow the media to see what the actual facts are and then accurate information may be reported to mitigate recent adverse publicity."

Unanswered Questions

While the defense and prosecution dispute what the latest revelations might mean, experts also appear divided.

When asked what the tape on the bodies might mean to the case, Robert Pugsley, a law professor at the Southwestern University School of Law in Los Angeles, told ABCNEWS Radio: "This 8-month-old fetus was the direct intended victim, as well as the mother, of the homicidal activities of the murderer.

"This is a clear indication that the state is perfectly justified — indeed, I think, obliged — to pursue the double-homicide case which they've already laid," he said.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DA wants autopsy results made public

DA wants autopsy results made public Fetus had tape around neck

Thursday, May 29, 2003 Posted: 9:48 PM EDT (0148 GMT)

On the Scene: Toobin: Prosecutors calling bluff over autopsy report

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MODESTO, California (CNN) -- On the heels of gruesome information leaked from the autopsy report on Laci Peterson's unborn child, the prosecutor in the case filed a motion Thursday seeking to unseal the reports on both the mother and child so that the media can report "accurate information."

Stanislaus County District Attorney James Brazelton said the people of California have the right to correct inaccurate information, suggesting the media reports on the autopsy are not.

"By releasing the autopsy reports, the court will allow the media to see what the actual facts are and then accurate information may be reported to mitigate recent adverse publicity," his motion read.

Brazelton earlier Thursday released a statement, saying he "cannot verify the accuracy of any media statements concerning the contents of the autopsy reports without violating the court's order."

He later decided to file the motion.

"It continues to be the view of the district attorney that the evidence in this case should be presented in court through testimony of witnesses and not selectively leaked to the news media by unknown persons whom the press will not identify," he said.

His motion will be heard June 6 in Superior Court in Modesto.

Scott Peterson, 30, is awaiting trial on two counts of murder for the deaths of his wife Laci, 27, and their unborn son, who was to be named Connor. Prosecutors have said they will seek the death penalty if he is convicted. Peterson insists he is innocent.

Just two days ago, Superior Court Judge Al Girolami heard arguments on whether to keep the autopsy results sealed, with prosecutors and the defense arguing that unsealing them could jeopardize Peterson's chance for a fair trial. News organizations countered by saying the results are a matter of public record and should be released. Girolami did not rule on the matter at that time.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LACI'S UNBORN BABY HAD A 'NOOSE' AROUND HIS NECK

(((Ah, media sensationalizing the title, my opinion here!)))

LACI'S UNBORN BABY HAD A 'NOOSE' AROUND HIS NECK

By HOWARD BREUER and CYNTHIA R. FAGEN

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 30, 2003 -- Laci Peterson's unborn child had plastic tape wrapped around his neck and a large cut across his shoulders when he was found in the shallow waters of San Francisco Bay.

The shocking revelation opens the possibility that the 81/2-month fetus had been born and then strangled, a forensic expert told The Post.

According to sources close to the probe, the boy, who was to be named Conner, was found with 11/2 loops of plastic tape around his neck, with an inch gap in between the tape and the skin - making the tape resemble a noose.

Noted forensics expert Dr. Henry Lee said that would be "with strangulation." Lee, who is not connected with the case, said it was possible the child had been born and then strangled - but cautioned that more details needed to be revealed before he could say conclusively.

The latest blockbuster details were first reported by MSNBC and later confirmed by The Associated Press.

The revelations could bolster the defense's contention that members of a Modesto satanic cult - not Scott Peterson, Laci's husband - killed his wife and unborn child, Lee said.

"This opens up a lot of interesting questions," said the doctor, who provided DNA expertise for the O.J. Simpson double-murder case.

The new headline-grabbing murder mystery has intensified since Laci's headless body washed ashore in San Francisco Bay on April 14. The fetus was retrieved a day earlier.

Sources involved in the case told Fox News that investigators were not ruling out that the plastic tape could have been floating debris that managed to wrap itself around the baby's neck.

Top forensic pathologist Dr. Michael Baden doubts the fetus was actually born, but was still intact in the womb when Laci died. If the baby had been separated, Baden said, the tiny body would have deteriorated faster than Laci's.

Both bodies were found to be in the same condition.

"We just have to wait and see," Baden said.

Reacting to yesterday's stunning autopsy details, District Attorney James Brazelton lashed out at the media, saying that because of the leaks, his office had filed a motion to unseal the full 25-page autopsy report.

"The information leaked has clearly been skewed in favor of the defense," the motion stated.

Peterson, 30, who has pleaded not guilty, is in jail pending his trial on charges of double murder. Mark Geragos, Peterson's defense lawyer, has asserted that a mystery brown van was seen around the Petersons' neighborhood sometime around his 27-year-old wife's disappearance.

The defense also contends it knows at least four or five people who were actually involved in the "satanic" killing.

A preliminary hearing has been set for July 16, when prosecutors will have to show they have sufficient evidence to try Peterson on murder charges. If he is convicted, he could face death by lethal injection.

A spokesman for the Contra Costa County coroner's office left a recording saying officials would not comment.

(Excerpt) Read more at modbee.com ...


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: avoidingchildsupport; baby; babyunborn; conner; deathpenaltytime; dontubelievemyalibi; getarope; ibefishing; laci; lacipeterson; smallbaby; smallchild; sonkiller; unborn; wifekiller
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 761-780781-800801-820 ... 901-909 next last
To: justshe; runningbear; jdontom
Oh yeah, I believe he said it..I hope you didn't think I was questioning your reporting. I trust ya!!

I just have numerous doubts about his claim...I had a instuctor who was also a probation and parole officer. In his class...we learned that evidence of such cults can be found in communities..

Runningbear, jdontom..I sure would love to hear your opinions....
781 posted on 05/30/2003 11:20:00 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8 (Please pray for our troops.... http://anyservicemember.navy.mil/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 778 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse

Translation from Anseian to Modern English: "I can't answer you because I had no idea what I was talking about to begin with."

I have some observations..

That's his job..

Asking you politely to explain your own comments is "giving you orders"

Oh my...

Now, again... What "Government powers" are you refering to here?

Why is that such a difficult question?

782 posted on 05/30/2003 11:20:30 PM PDT by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 779 | View Replies]

To: justshe; runningbear; jdontom
It's late.....I'm tired. G'nite all...
783 posted on 05/30/2003 11:22:05 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8 (Please pray for our troops.... http://anyservicemember.navy.mil/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 778 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
As an outsider who peeked in to the exchanges between you and jhoffa.. are you saying that the defendant's atty is using local law enforcement for their parallel investigation?
784 posted on 05/30/2003 11:25:03 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8 (Please pray for our troops.... http://anyservicemember.navy.mil/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 779 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
I remember years ago seeing pictures of the Mud People....in L.A.(Hollywood).

These were people who would cover their entire bodies with mud...hair and face included....and then walk down the streets attempting to get closer to Mother Earth...or some such.

I figure if those type of nuts were around years ago...the "nutso culture" HAS to have evolved(?) towards satanic cults etc. by now.

And no.....I didn't think you were questioning my reporting. :-)
785 posted on 05/30/2003 11:29:51 PM PDT by justshe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 781 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
Okay, JH, I'm sorry I snapped at you. Apparently you are really asking this question.

Dragging people into court to testify? Well, Geragos can do that in this case. He can use subpoenas.

But I was talking about the fact that he is apparently trying to run a parallel investigation with that of the police. He appears to be re-doing what they have done so far. He is obviously going to try, among other things, a battle of the experts. (Spare us!)

B/F the preliminary hearing was set, the prosecutor was talking about maybe using a grand jury in this case. No sooner had the DA said that, than Geragos went around putting out word that the DEFENSE was going to give the prosecutors a list of witnesses that the DEFENSE wanted called in the grand jury. Unheard of! The defense has no such right! The state runs the grand jury, and that's that. They can do what they want with it, and the defense does not have a say. If the defense doesn't like what the grand jury produces, it can file a motion to dismiss the indictment. But the defense can't run the grand jury before the fact.

On other fronts, it appears that Geragos is surely lining up forensic experts who would presumably testify in a way which would bolster his crazy theory (which he plucked out of thin air) that "satanists" killed Laci and the baby. Thus, he will have his experts, and the state will have theirs. Parallel investigations. One negates the other.

Next thing, Geragos claims HE will SOLVE THIS CRIME. He's starting to sound like Joe Friday by this time. What the heck business is it of his--to solve crimes?? He is supposed to protect Scott's rights. He is not supposed to be going around pointing the finger at other people, some of whom might actually be innocent. Dangerous.

Then we hear that there is this "mystery woman" witness who Geragos says can tell us who "really" killed Laci. Then we hear that the defense "has her in their custody". Once again, it's making it sound as though the defense were a police agency in its own right. It's not.

The power to police is a function of the government. It is not something which is ordinarily given to private individuals. I have no great respect for our huge, swollen, overbearing government, but still, it does have some legitimate functions which belong solely to IT. And policing the citizens (and others) is one of those functions. For heaven's sake, we might as well have the government earning a small fraction of the money it sucks out of us, by performing the police work for us! One of its useful functions--for a change.
786 posted on 05/30/2003 11:31:03 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 460 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
Whoa! That must be strange. What was he doing, leering at that female lawyer for the newspapers? That Charity What's-her-name?

He's a mess.
787 posted on 05/30/2003 11:32:28 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 464 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
If I recall, half the stuff Johnny Cochran spewed in his opening testimony in the OJ case about "what the evidence was going to reveal" was untrue and never came up in court. Geragos knows that too. But, then again, with the right jury, who needs evidence?
788 posted on 05/30/2003 11:35:26 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 786 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
I know you may find it unsavory, but the defense can call witnesses, force them to testify, put forth (ahem) "alternative" theories (which the judge may well disallow if they are over the top) call "expert" witnesses and so on and so forth.

A well represented defendant has allot of room to operate here, and MG is making the most of it.

It doesn't bother me. I like to see these things happen so that when the smoke clears no one has to second guess themselves and there's no remorse about the sentence.

Freedom is unique in the sense that we can't give it back.

You know, you can't come along later and tell someone: "Whoops, we screwed up.. here's your 10 years back." Once you take it, it's gone for good..

So I like to see these things and I like to be sure.

789 posted on 05/30/2003 11:40:27 PM PDT by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 786 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich
The guy looks like a pixie.

Yeah, a pixolated pixie!

790 posted on 05/30/2003 11:41:56 PM PDT by EastCoast (The Geragos' stage play reminds me of "Wrongfully Accused" w/Leslie Nielson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 711 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
There is a whole lot of stuff that SCOTT PETERSON SHOULDN'T BE ALLOWED TO DO.

For starters, he shouldn't be allowed to invent false evidence. He shouldn't be allowed to find lunatics and influence them to talk about their delusions as though those delusions were real. He shouldn't be allowed to have some woman "in the custody" of "the defense". He shouldn't be allowed to selectively leak gruesome details of the sealed autopsies. He shouldn't be allowed to have press people putting out false stories to TAINT the jury pool. He shouldn't be allowed to HARASS WITNESSES BY CALLING THEM AND OFFERING THEM GIFTS.

He shouldn't be allowed to have bail, b/c he is clearly a flight risk and he is charged with the most serious of crimes. He shouldn't be allowed to convert his dead wife's SEPARATE property (valuable inherited property, to name one example) to his own use, when there are other legitimate claimants. He shouldn't be allowed to swear that he is indigent one day, and suddenly pick and choose expensive counsel the next day--especially as I understand said counsel is being paid, to a significant extent, by the TAXPAYERS.

Oh, let's hear it. "Thcott Peterthon ithn't doing all thothe thingth! Hith lawyer ith!" Hello? His lawyer is acting for Scott Peterson!

Oh, and did I forget one minor thing? He shouldn't be allowed to murder his wife and child--just in case he did!!!
791 posted on 05/30/2003 11:46:26 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 466 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
Um, it's not exactly over yet.

And today it appears Geragos stepped in a pile of his own sleazy stuff. He actually lost his cool, from what I hear. Heh heh. He's not looking as smug these days. Keep the old chin up, Mark!
792 posted on 05/30/2003 11:48:54 PM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 476 | View Replies]

To: justshe
I betcha snotty gave it to Amber...maybe that is Allred's OH .---MY--- Gawd!!!!!!!!
793 posted on 05/30/2003 11:49:05 PM PDT by joyce11111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 770 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
I wonder...I went to an About.com forum tonight..just to see what they are saying elsewhere on the *net*..OMG...they all think snotty is innocent and that the Rocha's are trash!!!!!
794 posted on 05/30/2003 11:50:40 PM PDT by joyce11111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 773 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
You're really taking this personally, aren't you?

Are you related or otherwise personally tied into this case in some fashion?

(Cousin, ex-next door neighbor, school chum, or whatever.. ?)

795 posted on 05/30/2003 11:51:22 PM PDT by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 791 | View Replies]

To: Jackie-O
They will just jump at ANY chance to spin!!

And isn't that what we all thrive on?

796 posted on 05/30/2003 11:57:45 PM PDT by PFKEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies]

To: Rusty Roberts
thanks to none other than Scott, who inhabited the house for several months on and off.

On the off chance this guy is innocent, and in this great land that is the presumtion, what would be your remedy?

Seize all his property and then if arrested you could say see. Or better yet if found guily then you can see.

797 posted on 05/31/2003 12:03:02 AM PDT by PFKEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 385 | View Replies]

To: fxrdeb
ROFLMAO!!!!!
798 posted on 05/31/2003 12:03:38 AM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 645 | View Replies]

To: Jackie-O
Puppy-child is a girl? lol, I didn't know that! My pup has a hurt paw. I guess I'll be taking him to the vet tomorrow. I don't know what he did to his paw.
799 posted on 05/31/2003 12:12:22 AM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 679 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
One thing about Larry King: he's consistent. Always pathetic. Always inept.

He gets the guests everyone wants to see. That's how he keeps his show on the air. But as an interviewer, he is the lamest ever.
800 posted on 05/31/2003 12:15:40 AM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 682 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 761-780781-800801-820 ... 901-909 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson