Posted on 05/29/2003 12:35:36 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
Annika Sorenstam, who dominates the Ladies Professional Golf Association, became the first female golfer to play in a Professional Golf Association event in 58 years.
She finished her first day one over par, but did not make the 36-hole cut because during the second day she finished with a 74, missing the cut by four shots.
During her press conference, she sounded surprisingly down, and practically conceded that she reached beyond reasonable expectations. Hey, after one try, why not give it another shot before throwing in the towel?
In any case, many fail to realize that the PGA never forbade female competitors. Indeed, Babe Didrikson Zaharias played in a PGA tournament in 1945, making the 36-hole cut, but failing to make the 54-hole cut. By contrast, the LPGA tour, by definition, confines its entrants to females.
How did Sorenstam qualify for Texas' Colonial invitational in the first place? She received a "sponsors' exemption," which allows, by any criteria, a select number of entrants to play. Some men, at first, grumbled that she failed to qualify by playing in a tournament from the women's rather than from the men's tee. She, therefore – according to the critics – entered under less trying circumstances than those required for men.
Golfer Vijay Singh, in particular, said, "I hope she misses the cut. Why? Because she doesn't belong out here." He then quickly backed up and said, "She's the best woman golfer in the world, and I want to emphasize 'woman.' We have our tour for men, and they have their tour. She's taking a spot from someone in the field." Yet, in years past, several men received sponsors' exemptions, including past "champions" no longer competitive. Thus, she did not "take a space" from a male tour golfer.
What's the harm? Last year, the 32-year-old Swede won 13 tournaments, exerting a dominance beyond that of even Tiger Woods. Fellow LPGA player Juli Inkster likens Sorenstam to Woods, "She's the Tiger Woods of our tour. If Tiger had a 'next level' to go to, I bet he would do it. I think she's one who always wants to challenge herself and see how she stacks up against the best. The men are the best."
Sorenstam simply crushes her league. She hits a ball longer than many men. She said she made no statement concerning women – not one of those I-am-woman-hear-me-roar deals, but simply sought to elevate her game by playing with the best.
Does this mean that men can now compete in an LPGA Tournament?
Years ago, a boy in New York tried out for and made the girls' high-school field-hockey team, which state regulations allowed him to do because there was no boys' field-hockey team. New York reporter Melissa Hebert summed it up precisely when she wrote, "With girls going out for boys' teams, the question is, is she good enough? When a boy goes out for a girls' team, the question often is, is he bad enough?"
One female commentator cheered on Sorenstam and called golf a "non-gender sport." If, by that, she means both sexes play the game, sure. If, however, she suggests that most professionals possess equal skills or hit the ball just as far, she fails to properly credit Annika with abilities far beyond those of most professional female golfers.
As mentioned earlier, Annika called the Colonial a one-time event, and that she did not anticipate entering into any other male events. The Colonial, say experienced golfers, while 700 yards longer than the typical LPGA setup, remains one of the shorter men's courses with only two par fives, and thus the Colonial is one where women might likely compete more effectively. Other courses, with higher pars, likely serve more problematic for female golfers, however talented.
Still, Sorenstam beat 11 other men, and displayed poise, class and a sense of humor. Hey, if a female pitcher for the New York Yankees can throw a 95-mile-an-hour fastball, imagine the attendance.
Where is Martha Burk, the woman who banged on the gates to let women into Augusta? Where is the National Organization for Women, one of whose chapter presidents disagreed with charging Scott Peterson for double homicide in the murder of his wife, Laci, and unborn son, Conner?
As a step forward for, call it, female achievement and accomplishment – especially without the supportive agitation of some civil-rights group – this seems far more historically significant. Most male golfers offered support, and, in fact, pulled for her and cheered her on. Television ratings soared, and the event drew 400 reporters, nearly four times the customary number. Meanwhile, Burk's anti-Masters protest drew about 50 attendees, many of them members of the press.
Somehow, someway, Sorenstam pulled this off without NOW's Kim Gandy or the National Council of Women's Organizations' Burk. Say it ain't so.
Kinda like herpes.
You forgot the "i" in lilliputian.
Spelling errors when belittling another poster's mental prowess are an indication of something else. I'll leave it unsaid, for fear of upsetting the moderator.
The gallery seemed to appreciate her gutsy play and unwillingness to give up. Her 268-yard driving average ranked her 100th in the 113-person field
some of presidio9's greatest quotes:
"Her weakest asset yesterday was the fact that she was hitting it 250yds with her driver."
"For PGA tournament golf purposes, she's still a 250 yeard hitter. No getting around it."
"I don't know where to find the overall stats, but I randomly picked Rocco Mediate, because I am a fan. He normally hits the ball 277yds, 147th on the Tour. He is hitting 274 this, which is good for 69th or about halfway down the field. And it is very likely that he did not use his driver on all four holes, because most men don't on this course. Annika is averaging 248, down from the ridiculous 275. Trust me, I go to a lot of men's and women's Tournaments. She averages 250-260."
"Her driving distance average was 248. And, yes, she did hit driver on the driving distance holes. So much for the silly idea that she averages 275."
"All I know is she came into the Tournament averaging 275 off the tee. Yesterday, she averaged 248."
and last but not least:" I have a soft spot for people who argue for the sake of arguing without the benefit of facts"
From another thread:
In a related story, Barry Sanders will retire from football.
The analogy is faulty. Barry Sanders was an excellent football player.
6 posted on 04/24/2003 5:22 PM EDT by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse
Remeber people, this is presidio9 talking to HIMSELF!
Considering you are arguing with yourself in that thread, can we safely assume you are a "mental lillputian"?
You desperate cries for research are tedious.
You(r) desperate posting of anything you can invent without reference is pathetic. Although almost as funny as you posting to yourself.
And so are you.
This, coming from "multiple personality man"!
I actually made no predictions on whether Sorenstam would make the cut or not, contrary to the claims of some discredited individuals who shall remain nameless (but their initials are presidio9) ;-)
If she could get her putting average down to around 29 (from 32) with the help of a Dave Pelz type, she'd pick up 2-3 strokes per round. It would still be a tough run for the cut for her.
Her short game looked like mine, but her fairways & GIRs were pretty respectable. She was awesome for F & G the first day, especially under that kind of pressure.
Hey presidio9 what gives? You've run out of rope so now you're digging a hole. Give it up before people start thinking you don't know what you're talking about:-)
GIR = greens in regulation.
http://www.pgatour.com/tournaments/r021/results.html The bottom half of the field usually doesn't make out that well. The share for the upper half of the field has increased dramatically over the last decade. Ten years ago, the winner of a tournament like this might have made $200K. Now it's $900K. I think when we were doing our seasonal tour thing, a big purse was the winner's share from the Player's Championship at Sawgrass - around $540K. Now the winner gets over a million.
Annika helped sweeten the pot for the Colonial, no doubt about that.
The way I see it is that the only thing holding him back in this endeavor is a plausible new screenname, one that we would never suspect is him. Despite his immense talent in making things up, perhaps he can't come up with a new name. So let's give him some help. Please post your ideas for screennames for presidio9's new imaginary friend.
I say: presidio10
No accounting for tastes. ;-)
On another thread, presidio said:
And, while ratings were up on Thursday and Friday, the numbers were still negligible.
Ooooops! Wrong again!
TxPilot
Oh wait, I think he's already using that one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.