Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Details Emerge About Condition of Laci's Body (WARNING: GRAPHIC)
Fox News ^ | 5-23-03 | Fox News

Posted on 05/23/2003 12:07:50 PM PDT by cgk

Edited on 04/22/2004 12:36:23 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-175 next last
To: oceanview
I got the impression that the MEs never made a "call" one way or the other, but that independent forensic experts who have read the report believe it was caused by being in the water. Michael Baden said that the limbs could have been "pulled" off by the weights/anchors/whatever she was "anchored" with.

And the people that are pushing the "she was carved up" theory are The Defense Team, through Geraldo and Breathless Rita Cosby.

Remember, this ALL started being leaked when Geragos came onboard.
41 posted on 05/23/2003 12:42:27 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Rightfootforward
Bump to that.
42 posted on 05/23/2003 12:44:18 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: yonif
Condit did it.
43 posted on 05/23/2003 12:46:01 PM PDT by AngryAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cgk
head, leg (with tatoo), arms (hands)- to avoid identification....but HEART? This is so grotesque.
44 posted on 05/23/2003 12:46:24 PM PDT by jerseygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
"This was NO boating accident."

Where have I heard that before?...

45 posted on 05/23/2003 12:46:47 PM PDT by Hatteras (The Thundering Herd Of Turtles ROCK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Hatteras
This lends a little credibility to the defence.

......which is exactly why these stories are interpreted as they are.

There is nothing definite for any interested person to know, but the Satanic cult theory is just what the defense wants out there for public consumption. Geragos is loving this.

46 posted on 05/23/2003 12:47:45 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
I got the impression that the ME report was very noncommittal and that the defense is spinning for all its worth.

I also wondered if the ME report could have been written to leave out parts that would give away other evidence they have. Do they ever do that?
47 posted on 05/23/2003 12:47:47 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: cgk
voodooscott.com


Remains

NOTE: This assessment is done by an amateur with a very small photo and a magnifying glass. This is by no means an expert opinion!

1. Head absent, no neck visible.

2. Shoulders clearly defined. Dark spots in arc across upper chest and on insides of shoulders appear to be the outline of a garment, possibly a light colored sleeveless nightgown.

3. Left arm is resting on large rock with forearm bones extended slightly over the torso (where the skin ends, bone starts). Dark spot near waist area is end of forearm bones with no hand attached. Closer inspection reveals two forearm bones clearly defined.

4. Right arm appears to be laying on top of the torso and bent at a sharper angle than the left arm, over the right breast. Dark spot in center of torso appears to be end of forearm bones with no hand attached. Another shadow is obscuring the right elbow area.

NOTE: The forearms are both skeletal. The dark spots, which I think must be bone marrow showing, would indicate that the hands had been intentionally removed. Think of a whole chicken bone, with rounded, smooth, white ends. Then think of a broken chicken bone where you can see the bone marrow. The ends of these bones did not come off through decomp.

5. Abdominal area appears flat and narrow, as if largely skeletal under the clothing.

6. Partial right leg present, appears to be absent below the approximate knee area. Dark area visible at leg end, appears to have been deliberately severed. Green discoloration may be from decomposition.

7. Partial left leg present, bent at the knee, no foot. The lightest spot is the bent knee in the air. The darker portion below is the underside of the thigh. Black spot visible at leg end, appears to have been deliberately severed. Green discoloration may be from decomposition.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For Geraldo's Autopsy Findings Click HereGeraldo's Autopsy report

Or this link

Remains: voodooscott.com

48 posted on 05/23/2003 12:48:13 PM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hatteras
I heard it just this morning from hobbes1!
49 posted on 05/23/2003 12:48:53 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
well, i understand your points, but why are they searching aggressively for more body parts, they must need them for some reason, and it sure looks like they are trying to refute some line of attack from Geragos regarding the condition of the corpse.
50 posted on 05/23/2003 12:48:57 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
Oh, you are absolutely *the* best! Thanks.
51 posted on 05/23/2003 12:49:24 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
but why are they searching aggressively for more body parts

I suspect they are hoping to find one still attached to a "homemade anchor," which is what Scott claimed he did with the missing concrete, and two of which he claimed he made are unaccounted for.

52 posted on 05/23/2003 12:50:22 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
Ok. I was being SARCASTIC.

On a lighter note, I do agree with you.

Have a nice holiday.

53 posted on 05/23/2003 12:50:49 PM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
;o).... nearing the end of my work day...LOL.. Thanks.
54 posted on 05/23/2003 12:52:04 PM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I got the impression that the ME report was very noncommittal and that the defense is spinning for all its worth.

Admittedly, I am not very familiar with the ME report particulars, but I got the same impression.

I also wondered if the ME report could have been written to leave out parts that would give away other evidence they have. Do they ever do that?

I have no idea. Are there restrictions imposed by the court as to "conclusions" being released? It seems it would make sense with a pending trial, but I don't know.

55 posted on 05/23/2003 12:52:18 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
I can only suppose that the State needs/seeks as much evidence as they can find and may mostly want to further prove their theory.

But alas, all we poor spectators can do is guess and guess and guess.

56 posted on 05/23/2003 12:54:43 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
there should be a location that should have a huge amount of forensic evidence, blood, etc. where is it?

In the water?
My guess is that he killed her in the house with a blunt object blow or by strangulation, and took her to the bay and put her over the side into the water before dismembering her.

So9

57 posted on 05/23/2003 12:55:28 PM PDT by Servant of the Nine (A Goldwater Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
"...it does not appear to be the house..."

An article recently posted in FR cited the prosecution as stating they had plenty evidence that the murder took place in the Peterson home. Don't know about the location of the dismemberment.

58 posted on 05/23/2003 12:56:56 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FourtySeven
Yeah, ok......well anyway, this report is kind of confusing: Is the baby's body present too, or is it now being suggested that it was delievered, and then she was killed? Does anyone know?

From the article: "The womb, however, is intact -- suggesting that the nearly full-term baby was not cut out of Laci’s body but was expelled naturally after she was killed."

59 posted on 05/23/2003 12:57:44 PM PDT by alnick ("Never have so many been so wrong about so much." - Rummy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All; cgk
"The source also told Fox that the condition of the body did not point to a ritual slaying, but instead indicates that it was cut up to aid in its disposal."

Remember when Scott was being interviewed by Diane Sawyer? They were discussing something and Diane said; "What about the baby?" Scott said; "Yea, that was the hardest." and then he sort of back tracked, because he realized how bad that sounded.

I wish I knew where the transcript was.

Anybody else catch that?

60 posted on 05/23/2003 12:58:58 PM PDT by Spunky (This little tag just keeps following me where ever I go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-175 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson