Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats troubled by White House effort to develop tactical nuclear weapons
Agence France-Presse | 5/22/03

Posted on 05/22/2003 2:59:16 AM PDT by kattracks

Leading Democrats in Congress expressed grave reservations about Bush administration attempts to create a new class of nuclear weapons that could be used on the battlefield.

The move by the White House to explore developing low-yield nuclear weapons sparked a revolt among senior Democrats in the US Senate, who pointed out that, while valued for their deterrent effect, nuclear weapons have long been considered off-limits for tactical military use.

"For the past nine or ten years, we've had a prohibition in law against the research and development," Senator Carl Levin said Wednesday at a press conference.

But the US Senate voted late Tuesday to lift that ban, acceding to White House wishes. Michigan Democrat Levin called the development "reckless and dangerous."

"The message from this administration (is) while we're telling everybody else don't go down that road, we are going to go down that road ourselves," he said.

Senator Dianne Feinstein said countries around the world were also likely to become alarmed by the development.

"It really says to the world that this nation with the mightiest military, is now going to begin to expand its nuclear weapons."

The controversy over the possible US development of low-yield nuclear weapons came as part of a larger senate debate on the 2004 Defense Authorization Bill that would give the Pentagon 400 billion dollars to fund military operations and modernize its arsenal.

The senate rejected an amendment by Feinstein that would have kept the decade-old ban on low-yield nuclear weapons in place -- a development that unleashed both heated defense and furious denunciations of the administration's defense and security policies from the senate floor.

Opponents warned Wednesday that introducing such weapons could trigger a dangerous new nuclear arms race.

"Do you know what the message is to India, to Pakistan, to North Korea -- to every other nation that wants nuclear weapons and has nuclear weapons?" said Senator Byron Dorgan.

"The message is, this country doesn't think that we ought to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons, or that we ought to prevent the use of nuclear weapons.

"That is exactly the wrong message this country ought to be sending anybody in the rest of the world," the North Dakota Democrat said.

The comments by Dorgan and other Democratic colleagues were mild compared to those of West Virginia Senator Robert Byrd, who issued a scathing denunciation of White House military and diplomatic policy, accusing the Bush administration of "prevarication and the reckless use of power," during the recently-concluded war in Iraq.

Supporters of developing, or at the very least researching, the use of such weapons, maintained nuclear devices may one day prove to be an important weapon and that revoking the ban was necessary to combat new security threats around the world.

"We need to be thinking about what we want the military to look like 20 or 30 years down the road," said Colorado Senator Wayne Allard, who argued that a modern military needs to have at its disposal the broadest possible range of weapons.

Feinstein, while vowing to continue to fight, warned that the weapons seem headed toward certain development in the absence of a public outcry against them. She explained the lack of public outrage on the after effects of the September 11, 2001 terror attack on New York and Washington, which traumatized the entire nation.

"I sometimes think that the wound was so deep from 9/11, and it presented such deep scar tissue on the American psyche," Feinstein said, "that it kind of opened to door to all kinds of things that the American people would not have supported before."

Nevertheless, "some of us decided that we're going to fight and try to raise the warning flag," she said.

Massachusetts Senator Ted Kennedy lamented the "very deep division that exists in this country about the radical departure of this administration in terms of nuclear policy."

"We are going to do everything we possibly can ... to halt this reckless escalation of the nuclear arms race," said the Democrat.



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: nukes; tacticalnukes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: Guillermo
50 quotes from meaningless Democrats.

Reminds me of the nightly news when they ask a Democrat what the Republicans are saying.

Obviously Republicans are so stupid you couldn't ask one of those rabid stinking infectious people anything you might get ill or worse.

My dad was leaning Democratic till I pointed this out to him. He had no answer as to why they would ask one Democrat what was happening and treat what he said as the complete truth. Then ask another Democrat what the Republicans were saying. After he noticed this it changed his prospective and he saw just how minipulated he had been.
21 posted on 05/22/2003 6:50:55 AM PDT by ImphClinton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: syriacus; piasa
...They are straw scarecrows living in straw houses...

No wonder they want to tax gasoline and won't drill ANWR. ;^)

22 posted on 05/22/2003 6:50:59 AM PDT by A_perfect_lady (Let them eat cake.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I love the idea. These weapons would be one additional reason for terrorists and their government supporters not to mess with the USA.
23 posted on 05/22/2003 6:58:07 AM PDT by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TalonDJ
 

1963 The M29 155mm (Heavy) Davy Crockett Launcher is pictured tripod-mounted in the display photo above.


24 posted on 05/22/2003 7:19:00 AM PDT by Wolverine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
This attitude about national defense is not suprising, coming from the party that thought it ok that klintoon got his privates sucked, while committing men to battle.
25 posted on 05/22/2003 7:21:56 AM PDT by AxelPaulsenJr (Shriner's Childrens Hospitals Provide Free Medical Care to Those In Need.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImphClinton
My dad was leaning Democratic till I pointed this out to him. He had no answer as to why they would ask one Democrat what was happening and treat what he said as the complete truth. Then ask another Democrat what the Republicans were saying. After he noticed this it changed his prospective and he saw just how minipulated he had been.
With all due respect that last phrase is doubtful. I was in my thirties when I truly discovered "bias in the media"--and in my fifties before I identified the formulation I now prefer--intrinsic anticonservative perspective in journalism (and other forms of entertainment . . .).

26 posted on 05/22/2003 7:50:31 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (<<---- click here for further analysis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Seems to me that the 'Rats are more concerned about foreign public opinion than they are about the hopes and aspirations of their own countrymen. From the viewpoint of anyone but a naive, starry-eyed Utopian, this makes no sense at all.

Foreigners aren't the ones who cast the ballots that get them elected.

27 posted on 05/22/2003 9:15:37 AM PDT by FierceDraka ("I am not a number - I am a FREE MAN!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolverine
Memo to Monica: DOWN GIRL, DOWN
28 posted on 05/22/2003 9:18:48 AM PDT by Imagine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Yep, it was. The whole news conference is here on FR, and Rumsfeld even takes him to task, basically saying he couldn't believe Jamie did that.
29 posted on 05/22/2003 9:26:02 AM PDT by visualops (My tagline better get some Viagra, or I'm gonna have to dump it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Looks like it's time to update my 1988 book (now out of print), A FIGHTING CHANCE - THE MORAL USE OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS.
30 posted on 05/22/2003 11:50:48 AM PDT by JoeFromSidney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
bump
31 posted on 05/22/2003 8:31:05 PM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson