Skip to comments.
Democrats troubled by White House effort to develop tactical nuclear weapons
Agence France-Presse
| 5/22/03
Posted on 05/22/2003 2:59:16 AM PDT by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: Guillermo
50 quotes from meaningless Democrats.
Reminds me of the nightly news when they ask a Democrat what the Republicans are saying.
Obviously Republicans are so stupid you couldn't ask one of those rabid stinking infectious people anything you might get ill or worse.
My dad was leaning Democratic till I pointed this out to him. He had no answer as to why they would ask one Democrat what was happening and treat what he said as the complete truth. Then ask another Democrat what the Republicans were saying. After he noticed this it changed his prospective and he saw just how minipulated he had been.
To: syriacus; piasa
...They are straw scarecrows living in straw houses... No wonder they want to tax gasoline and won't drill ANWR. ;^)
To: kattracks
I love the idea. These weapons would be one additional reason for terrorists and their government supporters not to mess with the USA.
23
posted on
05/22/2003 6:58:07 AM PDT
by
kesg
To: TalonDJ
To: kattracks
This attitude about national defense is not suprising, coming from the party that thought it ok that klintoon got his privates sucked, while committing men to battle.
25
posted on
05/22/2003 7:21:56 AM PDT
by
AxelPaulsenJr
(Shriner's Childrens Hospitals Provide Free Medical Care to Those In Need.)
To: ImphClinton
My dad was leaning Democratic till I pointed this out to him. He had no answer as to why they would ask one Democrat what was happening and treat what he said as the complete truth. Then ask another Democrat what the Republicans were saying. After he noticed this it changed his prospective and he saw just how minipulated he had been. With all due respect that last phrase is doubtful. I was in my thirties when I truly discovered "bias in the media"--and in my fifties before I identified the formulation I now prefer--intrinsic anticonservative perspective in journalism (and other forms of entertainment . . .).
To: kattracks
Seems to me that the 'Rats are more concerned about foreign public opinion than they are about the hopes and aspirations of their own countrymen. From the viewpoint of anyone but a naive, starry-eyed Utopian, this makes no sense at all.
Foreigners aren't the ones who cast the ballots that get them elected.
27
posted on
05/22/2003 9:15:37 AM PDT
by
FierceDraka
("I am not a number - I am a FREE MAN!")
To: Wolverine
Memo to Monica: DOWN GIRL, DOWN
28
posted on
05/22/2003 9:18:48 AM PDT
by
Imagine
To: mewzilla
Yep, it was. The whole news conference is here on FR, and Rumsfeld even takes him to task, basically saying he couldn't believe Jamie did that.
29
posted on
05/22/2003 9:26:02 AM PDT
by
visualops
(My tagline better get some Viagra, or I'm gonna have to dump it.)
To: kattracks
Looks like it's time to update my 1988 book (now out of print), A FIGHTING CHANCE - THE MORAL USE OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS.
To: kattracks
bump
31
posted on
05/22/2003 8:31:05 PM PDT
by
GOPJ
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
