Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Solution to Voting Problems in the States?
ChronWatch ^ | 21 May 2003 | Doc Farmer

Posted on 05/21/2003 5:56:33 AM PDT by DocFarmer

"The Solution to Voting Problems in the States?"

Posted by Doc Farmer Wednesday, May 21, 2003

Ah, Florida. The Sunshine State. Or, at least, that used to be the Floridian motto. Nowadays, it seems to have shifted to ''Florida--We're Too Dumb to Know How to Vote.''

Now, before I get a bunch of angry e-mail messages from retirees, orange farmers, and Mouseketeers, please understand something. I know it's not you're fault. The hanging chads, the endless courtroom dramas, the attempted re-writing of election law by SCOFLA (is that an appropriate acronym or what--just say it out loud, and marvel at what it sounds like...), are NOT the fault of the average man or woman on the street. It was politics. Plain, simple, corrupt politics.

Well, Election 2000 came and went, and there was a great hue and cry for a better, more accurate way to vote. So Florida politicians, always eager to spend (your) money, decided on a nifty, neato-torpedo new electronic voting system. They blew millions on it. They had training sessions, they did mock votes, test votes, and everything was looking both hunky and dory.

That is, until Primary Election Day 2002.

On that fateful day, the long-fanged serpent of politics reared its ugly head again, and we ended up with complaints, machines that the polling officers couldn't (or wouldn't) start up properly, delays, miscounts, the list goes on and on. And who gets blamed? The politicos who were trying to screw with the results (again)? Nope. It was the ordinary, hardworking (or retired) Floridian. I mean, Janet wanted to pull an AlGore on you guys again, and you get the shaft for it? Unfair, I cry!

Now we've got Campaign 2004/Decision 2004/Election 2004/Screw-Up 2004 in full swing, which means we're only 18 months away from yet ANOTHER electoral nightmare. The lib/dem/soc/commies are already trotting out their candidates (note to DNC: to comply with truth in advertising laws, please consider changing your campaign theme song to "Send in the Clowns") and they're having debates and photo-ops and all kinds of activities meant to badmouth Dubya. They want their chance to win in the next election, and they're no doubt devising even more complicated ways to cast and count ballots.

However, there's a very simple solution to the voting problems in Florida, and across most of the nation. And it's not expensive at all. The equipment is already available, it's secure, it's reliable, and it is familiar to all.

It's the Lottery.

Lottery machines are a ubiquitous part of our lives. Almost every state has a lottery of some form or another. And it's pretty simple. You take your slip of paper, you use a pencil or pen to fill in five or six spaces, you hand the slip to the clerk, they feed it to the machine, you get a ticket, and you're one step closer to your 14-squillion to one chance of being rich. Kids can do it (although, by law, they're not supposed to). My mom can do it (provided she's wearing her glasses). And Mom, although I love her dearly, isn't what you'd call mechanically inclined. She's dangerous with a can-opener, for pity's sake. But she can fill out a lottery form.

So why not use them to vote?

It's quite simple, really. Each voter would need to get a small voter registration card, with a bit of bar code or whatever it is the lottery machines can read when you win. On Election Day, you would go to any gas station, convenience store, supermarket, etc., that had a lottery machine. You'd fill out your slip, you hand it to the clerk, the clerk puts the slip in the machine. If you voted correctly, the machine would beep and ask for your voter registration card to verify your vote. If you made a mistake, the lottery machine would print out the errors you made and you'd get a chance to correct them.

Once your vote was verified, the lottery machine would then print out two slips. One would be for you, with your receipt of voting. The other would go into a sealed container. Your voting slip (the one that went into the lottery machine) would go into a separate sealed container.

To ensure a secret ballot, your votes would go into one secured file, and the fact that you voted would go into another separate file. This separate file would be used to ensure that you didn't follow the old Chicago rule (''vote early, vote often''). If you tried to vote too often, you'd get a nice knock on the door from the vote fraud police. If you were just absent-minded and forgot you voted earlier in the day, however, you wouldn't be in any trouble.

You'd be able to vote anywhere in the state, not just at a pre-defined polling station. On your way to work, at lunch, while getting groceries or gas or whatever. None of the hassle, and none of the politicking either. And since lottery machines are very easy to operate, none of the crapola you get from ''confused'' polling officers. You'd also have the advantage of cutting down on dead people voting. And the folks in jail might have a hard time getting to the local 7-Eleven to vote. Besides, if they do get there, they'd probably be too busy robbing the place to vote anyway...

Lottery systems are designed to be secure, and there are plenty of safeguards built into them to prevent tampering. Programming them to read votes would be very easy. Creating a voters guide would be equally simple. If you want candidate A, fill in number 1. For candidate B, fill in number 2. Et cetera. No butterfly ballots, no confusion.

And the system, being electronic, would be able to compile the votes very quickly. You wouldn't have to wait for individual polling stations to send in returns, because they already did the very moment you voted. There wouldn't be any confusion about where you voted from, either, because the votes would be cast on a statewide basis. Now, if you lived in a town that was having a mayoral vote, you could participate even if you were out of town that day. And the system, because of your voter registration card, would make sure that you were voting only on those items you were eligible to participate in.

Plus, with all of the money that the state would've saved using this voting system, they could provide an added incentive to try and counter voter apathy. If you voted, you'd be entered into a drawing. After the polls closed (late enough, hopefully, to allow everybody to get home before Dan Rather announced a winner prematurely, that is), the computer file that had a record of all the voters would randomly select people to win money. A thousand voters would get $1,000 each, a hundred would get $10,000, ten would get $100,000 and one voter would get a cool $1 million. Tax-free. Paid for by all that lottery money you already lost earlier in the year...

Who knows? With a system like that, perhaps people would actually start to look FORWARD to Election Day!

(Excerpt) Read more at chronwatch.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Florida; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: florida; lottery; scofla; scotus; vote; voting
By the way, this isn't satire...
1 posted on 05/21/2003 5:56:34 AM PDT by DocFarmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DocFarmer
I like that they allow for a paper trail. Most new electronic systems are just untraceable bleeps on someone's memory card with no way of checking the validity of any number that's forwarded.
2 posted on 05/21/2003 6:11:51 AM PDT by HatSteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DocFarmer
Sounds like an excellent idea. The money part wouldn't work in Alabama because we don't like public gambling here. We like to keep it in the back rooms where it belongs.
3 posted on 05/21/2003 6:20:58 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (If you're looking for a friend, get a dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flurry
Flurry,

You're kidding, right? EVERY election is public gambling. With their OWN money. Problem is, the public never wins. The House does. And the Senate...

Doc
4 posted on 05/21/2003 6:42:09 AM PDT by DocFarmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DocFarmer
You've got that right. I was born and raised and except for the 4 years in USAF and travel I've spent my whole life here and I still don't get the way we are. To get something like your plan, (which I truly like), here we'd have to leave the "LOTTERY" word out of it. Alabama has a high per capita rate of gambling but it's all under the table or behind closed doors. The mention of "LOTTERY" sends people into rants about EVIL. I still love my state but she is a strange bird.
5 posted on 05/21/2003 6:51:23 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (If you're looking for a friend, get a dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DocFarmer
Who knows? With a system like that, perhaps people would actually start to look FORWARD to Election Day!

I'm getting butterflies about the ballot already.

6 posted on 05/21/2003 7:11:09 AM PDT by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson