Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Bush and the GOP Poised to Sell-out Gun Owners
Armed Females of America ^ | 19 May 2003 | Nicki Fellenzer

Posted on 05/20/2003 11:38:12 AM PDT by 45Auto

Well, here we go again. Power-hungry cowards in Congress are once again seeking to ram gun control down our throats, and this time, our president – the man who was painted as a friend to the some 80 million-gun owners in this country by the National Republican Apologists (NRA) – says he will sign it if it reaches his desk.

But my goal today is not to take aim at the NRA for its obsequious and quite obvious silence on the G.W. Bush promise to sign the odious legislation to expand and make permanent the Clinton “Assault” weapons ban of 1994 into law – although God and Goddess know the NRA’s hypocrisy and ass kissing of the seat of power are glaring, to say the least. No, today I’m taking on the President himself…

· For playing political games with our freedoms;

· For maneuvering and dodging instead of taking a courageous stand;

· And for trying to appease the anti-freedom maggots in congress and at Handgun Control, Inc. (And no, I won’t call it the “Brady Center.” They are what they are, regardless of the name change.)

Consider this: George W. Bush is a man who ran on the premise that he was a friend of the Second Amendment. In the 2000 elections, the NRA drooled at the prospect of having Bush in office. An excerpt from a story on Boston.com tells the story quite well: “On the NRA tape, [Kayne] Robinson calls Gore an ‘antigun fanatic’ and said electing him would be a ‘horror story.’ But with Bush, the likely Republican nominee, they will have ‘unbelievably friendly relations.’”

In October, 2000, then-NRA President Charlton Heston stomped around the country urging gun owners to vote for George W. Bush, describing the presidential campaign as "a holy war" for the constitutional rights of gun owners.

And now, the President to whom a large number of gun owners gave their vote – a sacred trust to protect their rights and the US Constitution – is underhandedly voicing his tacit support for the permanent ban of certain types of firearms. No, he’s not proud of his support. He’s keeping a low profile, letting his lackeys do the talking, while keeping conspicuously silent himself. If the ban never sees his desk, his spin-doctors can twist the sad facts into a positive development for the Bush Presidency: An odious Clintonesque gun control bill was killed during our brave leader’s reign!

If Congress passes H.R. 2038, and Bush signs it into law, you can expect a very large number of gun owners and patriots to turn away from Bush and from the Republican party. There’s no excuse for this heinous, unconstitutional legislation to see the light of day – not when we have a Republican majority in Congress and a Republican White House. Republicans are supposed to be gun owners’ friends, right?

Apparently, they aren’t. Apparently Republicans are just as willing to play politics with our rights as the Democrats. According to Newsday.com, “[House] Speaker Dennis Hastert opened the door Thursday to a vote on extending an assault weapons ban that expires next year, and the leader of House Democrats prodded President Bush to urge the Republican leadership to bring the bill to the floor.” It sure doesn’t sound like the Republicans are any better friends to gun owners than the Democrats. They’ll violate your rights just to appear “moderate” just as quickly as the Democrats, hoping their tepid reluctance will earn them brownie points.

Well, time has come to say it: Mr. President, you and your Republican cohorts are cowards and hypocrites, and gun owners know it!

Yes, I’m saying it loud and clear, so that you and your lackeys can read and revel in this fact. You have no courage. You have no integrity. You bend to the political convenience of the moment, because it’s the quickest road to re-election, and you think that little red, white and blue elephant on your lapel, your patriotic pictures on the USS Abraham Lincoln and your war on terrorism will erase or obscure this fact and that your membership in the Republican party will shield you from the wrath of those you have betrayed.

You feel complacent because you feel gun owners will support you regardless, because you happen to be the lesser of the two evils. You feel secure, shrouded in the Republican banner, because gun owners have consistently and loyally voted Republican. Well, I suggest you stop feeling secure, sir. Because gun owners don’t appreciate cowards and hypocrites. We don’t appreciate compromising twits, who will do anything to appear “moderate” while trading away our rights for a few votes. We appreciate truth, integrity and courage.

If you had any gonads at all, you would stand up and say, “I want to ban all the so-called ‘assault’ weapons and I will support any legislation which accomplishes this goal,” and then allow law-abiding and freedom-loving citizens of this country to turn away from you, as you know they will.

But no, you won’t do that, Mr. Bush, because politics are apparently much more important to you than principles. You want reelection so bad, you can taste it, and it appears you’ll do anything – even sell law-abiding gun owners to the socialist wolves – to get it.

The legislation you are too afraid to state your support for is a pernicious piece of garbage that will do nothing more than place further limits on our freedoms.

H.R. 2038 – the “Assault” weapons ban will do nothing to stop crime. Prior to the Clinton ban, a Bureau of Justice Statistics survey reported that in 1991, about 8 percent of state inmates had possessed a so-called “assault” weapon. Care to guess how many carried said weapon in the commission of a crime? LESS THAN ONE PERCENT.

A Virginia inmate survey conducted prior to the 1994 ban showed that while about 10 percent of incarcerated criminals ever owned an “assault” weapon, none had carried it at the scene of a crime.

Meanwhile, in 1997 – four years after the Clinton ban was passed – 1.5 percent of state inmates and 1.7 percent of federal inmates admitted to having used a weapon made illegal by the Clinton ban.

Both numbers are insignificant, but some are more insignificant than others. More criminals used the banned “assault” weapons during the commission of their crimes after the ban than before. Even now, the number of criminals who use “assault” weapons is pathetically small.

So what is the purpose of this ban?

Is it to reduce crime? Apparently not, since said weapons are rarely used to commit offenses.

It bans, among other things, pistol grips, folding telescopic stocks, threaded barrels, forward grips and barrel shrouds – none of which make a gun any more or less “dangerous” and none of which pose any threat to law enforcement. And yet, the legislation carries the deceptive name, Assault Weapons Ban and Law Enforcement Protection Act of 2003, even though it has no hope of “protecting” the already protected elite – the police, who are, of course, exempt from the bill’s provisions.

What you are tacitly supporting, Mr. Bush is nothing less than an attempt to ram yet more gun control down the throats of the American public. It’s not about crime, it’s not about protection, it’s about control, and if you are not part of the solution, then you are part of the problem –

- a problem we, gun owners, plan to battle and win.

If you are not to be a part of it, so be it. But at least have the courage to stand up and admit it, instead of hiding from the truth.

Admit that you would support an ineffective and unconstitutional ban on firearms for a political purpose.

Admit that you are too cowardly to stand up to Schumer, McCarthy, Feinstein and their weak-minded socialist brethren, because you’re afraid you’ll lose votes.

Don’t sit in the White House and have your lackeys proclaim what a great, courageous independent minded leader you are, because you’re willing to part with the NRA on this issue. What you’re doing is not courageous; it’s stupid, ineffectual and manipulative.

Our rights are not yours to maneuver for your political gain.

Our Constitution is not up for debate.

Our freedoms are not your bargaining chips, Mr. President.

Stand up, be a man and admit your support for this unconstitutional monster that aims to take firearms out of the hands of the law-abiding. Or if you don’t support this bill, have the courage to say so and face the mealy-mouthed, hand wringing wrath of Brady, Nosanchuk, Diaz and their socialist ilk.

You won’t get a pass on this, Mr. President. Your political games with our freedoms paint you as a coward, a manipulator and a traitor. It’s time for you to do the right thing. State your position, and face the consequences like a man.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism
KEYWORDS: aw; awb; ban; bang; banglist; rkba; sunset
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-127 next last
The poster does not necessarily endorse nor oppose any or all views expressed by the author - except for one. We must convince the GOP that the sunsetting of the 1994 Sport Utility Rifle Ban is a good idea.
1 posted on 05/20/2003 11:38:12 AM PDT by 45Auto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
Let's see, Bush is for banning (some) guns.

Bush is for turning a blind eye to illegal trespassers.

Bush is for unprotected borders.

Bush is for big government and skyrocketing budgets.

...help me out here, is he a RINO?
2 posted on 05/20/2003 11:43:20 AM PDT by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
I wonder just one thing: If this bill comes up for a vote and fails, is it an even bigger victory? Can Hassert be trying to knock off more Democrats by energizing gun owners against those who vote for this disgusting legislation? It's certainly not the way I would like to see it done, because once it's on the floor for a vote anything can happen, but does anyone else think this might be part of their thinking?
3 posted on 05/20/2003 11:46:43 AM PDT by gtech (Don't sell me out and expect my vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto; biblewonk
"Your political games with our freedoms paint you as a coward, a manipulator and a traitor. It’s time for you to do the right thing. State your position, and face the consequences like a man."

If Bush had advisors like this one, we'd likely be deep into Year Three of President Al Gore's first term.

4 posted on 05/20/2003 11:47:46 AM PDT by newgeezer (Admit it; Amendment XIX is very much to blame.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxed2death
...help me out here, is he a RINO?

Nope, you are just a simplistic malcontent.

5 posted on 05/20/2003 11:48:28 AM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: *bang_list

6 posted on 05/20/2003 11:48:35 AM PDT by Joe Brower (http://www.joebrower.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto; TLBSHOW
Admit that you are too cowardly to stand up to Schumer, McCarthy, Feinstein and their weak-minded socialist brethren, because you’re afraid you’ll lose votes.

I think she (the author) gets it.

7 posted on 05/20/2003 11:52:18 AM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Nope, you are just a simplistic malcontent.

How rude.

For someone not interested in gun rights, you do always seem to show up in these gun rights threads (albiet ridiculing gun owners).

8 posted on 05/20/2003 11:59:08 AM PDT by gtech (Don't sell me out and expect my vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
Two stupids talking to each other! One says DUH and the other says DUH DUH. And I am supposed to listen.
9 posted on 05/20/2003 12:00:28 PM PDT by cksharks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gtech; taxed2death
For someone not interested in gun rights, you do always seem to show up in these gun rights threads (albiet ridiculing gun owners)

How am I being rude?

All I did was make a reply #5 to taxed2death's reply #2, and stated my opinion, and that opinion is that taxed is overly simplistic in his/her political outlook and basically parrot's the usual malontent line.

Tar and feather me, gt, for stating my opinion.

10 posted on 05/20/2003 12:07:24 PM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: taxed2death
He, like many of his fellow politicians, is not exactly a... patriot.

Got it?
11 posted on 05/20/2003 12:12:38 PM PDT by A Vast RightWing Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
Let's hope "if it reaches his desk" is the operative part of his statement! Perhaps he doesn't expect that to happen.
12 posted on 05/20/2003 12:13:35 PM PDT by TheDon ( It is as difficult to provoke the United States as it is to survive its eventual and tardy response)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gtech
In my opinion, this article is more of a sign of frustration and anxiety brought out in RKBA fanatics (of which I am one) by the President's statement that he supports the extension ( making permanent)of the Clinton/Feinswine '94 Sport Utility Rifle Ban, than it is an absolute slam of the GOP. We need to marshall a lot of resources to "lean" on the GOP, the Pres. and the Congress NOT to re-up this worthless and unconstitutional travesty. Threats to withold votes/money might go a long way to help the GOP along. So far, all that has really occurred is a few people have opened their mouths and said a few stupid, premature, and perhaps unimportant things. There is still 18 months before the sunset; I think this fight is going to get more and more nasty as we get closer to that date. So, those with a weak stomach should lay in a supply of antacids.
13 posted on 05/20/2003 12:16:03 PM PDT by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gtech
Can Hassert be trying to knock off more Democrats by energizing gun owners against those who vote for this disgusting legislation?
I think this may be the case. Lately, "gun control" has been a great means for picking off RATS.
14 posted on 05/20/2003 12:16:57 PM PDT by wjcsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
More knee-jerk hysteria, no facts.

That figures.
15 posted on 05/20/2003 12:17:37 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Drug prohibition laws help support terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
You won’t get a pass on this, Mr. President.

Maybe he should push to lift the ban on "Tommy guns" isn't that a curb on freedom. The AWB is a meaningless "bone" for the gun control nuts, let it be. Has anyone found it so bad. Everyone knows it's a phony ban to start with so what's the big deal. All BUSH said is he will sign it if it hits his desk, he's a little busy right now. The only reason this is in the news is so the DEMS can FUND RAISE, the current ban doesn't even expire until next year.

16 posted on 05/20/2003 12:20:12 PM PDT by Mister Baredog ((They wanted to kill 50,000 of us on 9/11, we will never forget!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gtech
I have to agree. Any Democrats (such as Byrd from West Virginia) that insist on gun control, will have a difficult time explaining this.

At a time of raised alert level, we need all the firemarms we can get.
17 posted on 05/20/2003 12:24:05 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
The poster does not necessarily endorse nor oppose any or all views expressed by the author

Thanks for the disclaimer 45, but if this hadn't come from a Second Amendment group, I would feel a ZOT! would be appropriate.

18 posted on 05/20/2003 12:24:22 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxed2death
...help me out here, is he a RINO?

LOL! You must be kidding, do you think the perfect guy that you agree with on everything is out there available to run the country with total agreement from Congress. Make yourself a list of the things he's FOR that you LIKE, then pray we don't get a DEMONCRAT like Clintoon or his b*tch wife back in the White House.

19 posted on 05/20/2003 12:24:32 PM PDT by Mister Baredog ((They wanted to kill 50,000 of us on 9/11, we will never forget!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TheDon
A much bigger issue would be the Senate. They don't want to see it over there at all.

Maybe Hastert is playing games with the Senate in exchange for something else? Tax cut maybe?
20 posted on 05/20/2003 12:25:13 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-127 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson