Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton to Address JFK Library in Wake of Intern Revelations
NewsMax.com ^ | 5/17/03 | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

Posted on 05/17/2003 7:37:22 PM PDT by kattracks

Ex-President Bill Clinton will discuss his legacy at Boston's John F. Kennedy Presidential Library on May 28, in an event announced just hours after news broke that Kennedy, like Clinton, carried on a sexual relationship with a White House intern.

"Senator Edward M. Kennedy will introduce President Clinton, who will engage in a wide-ranging conversation with presidential historian Michael Beschloss," the Kennedy Library said, in a statement posted to it's Web site on Tuesday.

"President Clinton will reflect upon his own legacy and some of the central themes related to President Kennedy including the role of the U.S. in the world, domestic issues concerning the advancement of rights and opportunities for all Americans, and the importance of public service," the library explained.

News of the Kennedy intern scandal first appeared on Tuesday's front page of the New York Daily News, whose publisher, Mort Zuckerman, is a staunch Clinton media ally.

The revelation that Kennedy had the Clinton-like dalliance was merely alluded to in Robert Dallek's new Kennedy bio "An Unfinished Life," which offered a brief second hand account that an unnamed 19-year-old was kept on the White House staff primarily to provide Kennedy with "sexual release."

But Zuckerman's paper launched a full investigation. And by Thursday, the News had tracked down Marion "Mimi" Fahnestock, now a 60-year-old church worker in midtown Manhattan who confirmed that she carried on a sexual relationship with the 35th president from June 1962 to November 1963.

The result was a week's worth of front page headlines that made the JFK story one of the most talked about in the nation - and had conservatives wondering if those pushing the story hardest were actually more interested in rehabilitating Clinton's image.

Dallek himself is scheduled to address the Kennedy Library next Tuesday, in a session that will likely be dominated by Kennedy-Clinton comparisons - though the author himself has said that he considers the find relatively insignificant.

The JFK intern story wouldn't be the first time the Daily News publisher went to bat for Clinton in a big way. In 1995, both Zuckerman and then newly crowned House Speaker Newt Gingrich traveled with Clinton aboard Air Force One to and from Yitzhak Rabin's funeral.

Afterwards, the News published a front page story blasting Gingrich for throwing a temper tantrum - allegedly because he felt Clinton did not treat him with enough respect during the trip.

Under the headline "Crybaby," the News front-paged a characature of the leading Republican as a baby in diapers in the midst of a screaming fit. The report ended up being among the most damaging of all media attacks on Gingrich.

On Saturday the Daily News went so far as to make the JFK revelation the topic of an editorial - invoking the news to downplay the seriousness of the charges against Clinton.

"The story also fills a gap, however small, in the public record," the paper said. "And it provides some context: Bill Clinton, who was impeached because of his indefensible dalliance with Monica Lewinsky, was not, it turns out, the only Oval Office occupant with an eye for the interns."

In fact, Clinton was not impeached for his dalliance with Lewinsky, but because he perjured himself about the relationship in testimony before a federal judge and a grand jury in an attempt to obstruct justice in the Paula Jones sexual harassment case.

Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:

Clinton Scandals



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clinton; intern; jfk; mimi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

1 posted on 05/17/2003 7:37:22 PM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
In fact, Clinton was not impeached for his dalliance with Lewinsky, but because he perjured himself about the relationship in testimony before a federal judge and a grand jury in an attempt to obstruct justice in the Paula Jones sexual harassment case.

The clinton lovers always conveniently ignore his perjury, obstruction of justice & witness tampering! And the fact that he was fined & found in contempt of Court by a federal judge; was disbarred in Arkansas and barred from pleading a case before the Supreme Court.

2 posted on 05/17/2003 7:43:43 PM PDT by JulieRNR21 (Take W-04........Across America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"The story also fills a gap, however small, in the public record," the paper said. "And it provides some context: Bill Clinton, who was impeached because of his indefensible dalliance with Monica Lewinsky, was not, it turns out, the only Oval Office occupant with an eye for the interns."

No, he was impeached because he lied under oath, you maroons.

3 posted on 05/17/2003 7:44:13 PM PDT by Endeavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Kennedy and Clinton: two of the weakest leaders in the 20th Century.
4 posted on 05/17/2003 7:45:40 PM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
This whole thing has clinton's fingerprints all over it. It is his modus operandi. He feels that comparisons with JFK and also Jefferson somehow help him. During the height of impeachment we had the "verdict" of "historians" that Jefferson had a thing going with Sally Hemmings.

The now disgraced historian, Joseph Ellis gave a talk at UNC, and told a story about clinton that I attended, well before the Lewinsky story broke. At the time Ellis was humping his book on Jefferson. He (Ellis) spoke at the White House and clinton approached him afterwards and asked Ellis if he thought that there was any substance to the Jefferson-Hemmings rumors. This conversation took place in the mid-90's before it had become "accepted" that such a liason did exist. At the time Ellis stated that his historical opinion (he has since changed it) was that the liason did *not* occur. At the talk I attended he reported that clinton looked "truly disappointed" to learn this.

I think that clinton thinks that these comparisons show him (clinton) in a better light. I think he's clearly wrong, but I'd bet dollars to donuts that clinton is somehow involved with the latest JFK disclosure.
5 posted on 05/17/2003 7:45:44 PM PDT by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Hmmmm? I believe Rush said, "this is just another x42 rewrite the legacy tour".
6 posted on 05/17/2003 7:45:47 PM PDT by CyberAnt ( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
RUSH IS RIGHT! It is just X42 rewrite.
7 posted on 05/17/2003 7:48:13 PM PDT by jaz.357 (The END of the BEGINNING... is the BEGINNING of the END!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt; Lancey Howard; OldFriend; rambo316; Becki; backhoe
ping
8 posted on 05/17/2003 7:49:40 PM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
"Kennedy and Clinton: two of the weakest leaders in the 20th Century."

I think Jimmy Carter has the top honor for weakest.

9 posted on 05/17/2003 7:50:41 PM PDT by OneTime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
Kennedy, the pedophile.
10 posted on 05/17/2003 7:51:11 PM PDT by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Love the timing. No matter what the pervert tries to do to change the subject, it always comes back at him.....Monica Monica Monica
11 posted on 05/17/2003 7:51:54 PM PDT by OldFriend (without the brave, there would be no land of the free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kattracks; cardinal4
Anyone who thinks that clinton's legacy is anything but that stained blue dress is delusional.
12 posted on 05/17/2003 7:52:21 PM PDT by Ax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
And by Thursday, the News had tracked down Marion "Mimi" Fahnestock, now a 60-year-old church worker in midtown Manhattan who confirmed that she carried on a sexual relationship with the 35th president from June 1962 to November 1963.

Makes you wonder why Mimi decided to "come clean" so quickly.

13 posted on 05/17/2003 7:52:47 PM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Bubba, no matter how you try to pretend otherwise, you're no Jack Kennedy. Kennedy was a better president in three years than you ever could have been in eight. Kennedy had a beautiful, intelligent, classy wife. Kennedy had two bright, attractive, adorable children. And above all...he knew that fine cigars were intended to be smoked after the act of love, not to be used in it.
14 posted on 05/17/2003 7:57:12 PM PDT by RichInOC (How do you parody somebody who's a parody of himself?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The point universally missed is that Clinton was a psychopath and seriously mentally unstable to commit the acts he felt entitled to commit. His mentality was too dangerous to be in the Oval Office.
15 posted on 05/17/2003 7:58:15 PM PDT by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
JFK wasn't the object of a sexual harrasment lawsuit at the time of his affair. He also didn't commit perjury, obstruction of justice and abuse of power to supress the evidence that demonstrated his pattern of behavior. Because of his flagrant disrespect for the law, a woman was denied her day in court.

Impeachment was never about sex; it was about a man using his authority to trample over the "common folk" and set himself above the law.

Never forget!
16 posted on 05/17/2003 7:58:35 PM PDT by scott7278 (Four more years! Four more years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
They should hold this on a bridge over a river, and maybe Clinton could take a bite out of Ted just to show him how it's done.
17 posted on 05/17/2003 8:02:30 PM PDT by widowithfoursons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
X42 and her spouse. Figures
18 posted on 05/17/2003 8:04:02 PM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
This is a joke, right ?
19 posted on 05/17/2003 8:06:20 PM PDT by ex-Texan (primates capitulards toujours en quete de fromage!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks; Howlin; Liz
Clinton will reflect upon his own legacy...

This should be breaking news - no?

20 posted on 05/17/2003 8:06:41 PM PDT by Libloather (And it STILL isn’t safe enough to vote DemocRAT or Liberteen…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson