1 posted on
05/17/2003 7:37:22 PM PDT by
kattracks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
To: kattracks
In fact, Clinton was not impeached for his dalliance with Lewinsky, but because he perjured himself about the relationship in testimony before a federal judge and a grand jury in an attempt to obstruct justice in the Paula Jones sexual harassment case. The clinton lovers always conveniently ignore his perjury, obstruction of justice & witness tampering! And the fact that he was fined & found in contempt of Court by a federal judge; was disbarred in Arkansas and barred from pleading a case before the Supreme Court.
2 posted on
05/17/2003 7:43:43 PM PDT by
JulieRNR21
(Take W-04........Across America!)
To: kattracks
"The story also fills a gap, however small, in the public record," the paper said. "And it provides some context: Bill Clinton, who was impeached because of his indefensible dalliance with Monica Lewinsky, was not, it turns out, the only Oval Office occupant with an eye for the interns."No, he was impeached because he lied under oath, you maroons.
3 posted on
05/17/2003 7:44:13 PM PDT by
Endeavor
To: kattracks
Kennedy and Clinton: two of the weakest leaders in the 20th Century.
To: kattracks
This whole thing has clinton's fingerprints all over it. It is his modus operandi. He feels that comparisons with JFK and also Jefferson somehow help him. During the height of impeachment we had the "verdict" of "historians" that Jefferson had a thing going with Sally Hemmings.
The now disgraced historian, Joseph Ellis gave a talk at UNC, and told a story about clinton that I attended, well before the Lewinsky story broke. At the time Ellis was humping his book on Jefferson. He (Ellis) spoke at the White House and clinton approached him afterwards and asked Ellis if he thought that there was any substance to the Jefferson-Hemmings rumors. This conversation took place in the mid-90's before it had become "accepted" that such a liason did exist. At the time Ellis stated that his historical opinion (he has since changed it) was that the liason did *not* occur. At the talk I attended he reported that clinton looked "truly disappointed" to learn this.
I think that clinton thinks that these comparisons show him (clinton) in a better light. I think he's clearly wrong, but I'd bet dollars to donuts that clinton is somehow involved with the latest JFK disclosure.
To: kattracks
Hmmmm? I believe Rush said, "this is just another x42 rewrite the legacy tour".
6 posted on
05/17/2003 7:45:47 PM PDT by
CyberAnt
( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
To: kattracks
Bubba, no matter how you try to pretend otherwise, you're no Jack Kennedy. Kennedy was a better president in three years than you ever could have been in eight. Kennedy had a beautiful, intelligent, classy wife. Kennedy had two bright, attractive, adorable children. And above all...he knew that fine cigars were intended to be smoked after the act of love, not to be used in it.
14 posted on
05/17/2003 7:57:12 PM PDT by
RichInOC
(How do you parody somebody who's a parody of himself?)
To: kattracks
The point universally missed is that Clinton was a psychopath and seriously mentally unstable to commit the acts he felt entitled to commit. His mentality was too dangerous to be in the Oval Office.
15 posted on
05/17/2003 7:58:15 PM PDT by
RLK
To: kattracks
JFK wasn't the object of a sexual harrasment lawsuit at the time of his affair. He also didn't commit perjury, obstruction of justice and abuse of power to supress the evidence that demonstrated his pattern of behavior. Because of his flagrant disrespect for the law, a woman was denied her day in court.
Impeachment was never about sex; it was about a man using his authority to trample over the "common folk" and set himself above the law.
Never forget!
16 posted on
05/17/2003 7:58:35 PM PDT by
scott7278
(Four more years! Four more years!)
To: kattracks
X42 and her spouse. Figures
18 posted on
05/17/2003 8:04:02 PM PDT by
Waco
To: kattracks
This is a joke, right ?
19 posted on
05/17/2003 8:06:20 PM PDT by
ex-Texan
(primates capitulards toujours en quete de fromage!)
To: kattracks; Howlin; Liz
Clinton will reflect upon his own legacy...This should be breaking news - no?
20 posted on
05/17/2003 8:06:41 PM PDT by
Libloather
(And it STILL isn’t safe enough to vote DemocRAT or Liberteen…)
To: kattracks; Joy Angela; conservogirl; Ragtime Cowgirl; HangFire; gc4nra; Clinton Is Scum; ...
...If TED KENNEDY is now so eager to whitewhash an alive BILL CLINTON's past misbehaviors in Office, by exposing a dead JFK's past one's, for the "Good" of the Party...
...why wouldn't TED KENNEDY do all he could to protect HILLARY's Run for the U.S. Senate after JFK jr had decided to run against her in New York despite HILLARY's threats against him if he did =
...The JFK jr Tragedy..?
24 posted on
05/17/2003 8:12:12 PM PDT by
ALOHA RONNIE
(Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 www.LZXRAY.com)
To: kattracks
I always figured a destroyer was big enough that somebody in a small boat about to get run over by one ought to see it. Unless he was indisposed snorting cocaine, porking native women or some similar demmy preoccupation...
31 posted on
05/17/2003 8:33:55 PM PDT by
merak
To: kattracks
It's just pathetic how Clinton, so desperate to have a any sort of legacy that survives a dry cleaning, tries this "him too" routine vis-à-vis JFK.
The overreaching JFK comparison serves only to highlight how, even in the cheating department, the impeached President falls so pasty-white-trash-band-geek-like short, managing only to betray his pig-shrew wife with furtive sweaty beret-wearing-fat-girl encounters of the sort Jackie O's patrician husband would skip even when extra hopped-up on pain-killers.
To: kattracks
There needs to be more attention paid to the fact that JFK picked this girl while she was a high school student, and personally arrainged for her internship after meeting her.
To: kattracks
Obviously Clinton is proud of what he did in the oval office. He's beaming in the fact he one upped JFK by carrying on in the oval office, and talking to Members of Congress at the same time.
34 posted on
05/17/2003 8:38:22 PM PDT by
Reagan79
(Pro Life! Pro Family! Pro Reagan!)
To: kattracks
This is a joke, right?
35 posted on
05/17/2003 8:38:32 PM PDT by
SkyPilot
(CNN- the "Al Jazeera" of the West)
To: kattracks
The Clintons and the Kennedys were made for each other...they mirror each other perfertly.
36 posted on
05/17/2003 8:38:51 PM PDT by
skinkinthegrass
(Just because your paranoid,doesn't mean they aren't out to get you. :)
To: kattracks
But Zuckerman's paper launched a full investigation.LOFL!!!
Agents of the Clintons led them by the nose.
To: kattracks
bill clinton, this moron, is the best thing to happen to the Republicans for 50 years!!!!
39 posted on
05/17/2003 8:48:38 PM PDT by
ditto h
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson