Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Janeane Garofalo Calls It Like She Sees It: An interview with famed provocateur and pop pundit
Movie Poop Shoot ^ | May 16, 2003 | By Thom Fowler

Posted on 05/17/2003 7:51:00 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines

While I know and love Janeane Garofalo for her charmed comedy career, many Americans came to know her recently as a media spokesperson for the anti-war movement. While she, along with Susan Sarandon, the DIXIE CHICKS and Jessica Lange became the poster-women of hate for the anti-intellectual and insubstantial talk show hosts such as Bill O’Reilly who are more interested in good TV than good debate, she was also lauded for taking the anti-war message to the mainstream media. Garofalo made an interesting comment about being attacked by the right wing as much for being a woman as for being feminist and progressive. Come to think of it, Tim Robbins didn’t take nearly as much of a beating even though he was just as involved as his wife, Susan Sarandon.

Her interest in progressive social and political issues have been a strong motivator in her life and in her stand-up. I interviewed Janeane Garofalo to hear more of her side of the anti-war message without interruption or criticism and her personal interest in living, voting and supporting the progressive values platform.

This is a lengthy introduction but I hope it helps to provide the proper context to develop a deeper understanding of the point of view of Janeane Garofalo and where she and many others like her, fit into these larger stories about our ever evolving culture.

TF: What is your personal commitment to the progressive movement and why is it so important for you?

JG: I am a progressive, liberal person. I vote that way and I live that way. That is the way I believe is the ideal way for society to function in a liberal, tolerant, egalitarian way. I contribute money towards causes that espouse that. I believe anyone who values their civil liberties would think it is important especially women and people of color had better vote Democrat, especially the more liberal wing of the Democrats because this radically right-wing administration seeks to keep the playing field very unlevel. Askew, if you will.

I think anyone that’s concerned about their freedom and their future and their child’s future and the economy had better vote Democrat. And had better vote for the more liberal Democratic candidates. All this partisan flag-waving isn’t going to save the economy. It isn’t going to make you more secure from terrorists and it isn’t going to stop the corporate scandals. It isn’t going to stop the tragedies inherent in the globalization movement sponsored by the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund.

If you say that oil is a big motivator, a prime mover of the Bush Jr. Administration’s foreign policy agenda, people who discount any attempt to tell an alternate version of the story of the Bush Administration will say, “Oh, that’s crazy, that’s a ridiculous thing to say.” And that’s what proves that it’s oil. Why would they get so hyper about it? If it wasn’t oil, they’d just be like, easy going about it if people mentioned oil and said, “No, it isn’t.”

I equate this, before I quit, I quit drinking in 2001. Before that a lot of people would say, “You’ve got to quit drinking.” I would be like, “Why? I don’t have a problem with alcohol.” And they’d say, “You have to quit drinking alcohol.” I would say, “Alcohol is not the problem. I don’t have a problem with alcohol. I was adamant about that. And then my friend Amy said, “I need you to quit eating oranges. And I went, “Okay.” And then she said, “Do you see? I just asked you to quit eating oranges and you were fine with that. And when I asked you to quit drinking you make a big deal that drinking is absolutely not a problem.” I equate that, if that makes any sense, with the oil issue. If you bring up oil, you are somehow some kind of wing nut.

TF: If the Bush Administration is so keen on liberating the oppressed, as is now the Pentagon sponsored, media-driven, story about our foreign policy towards Iraq, why is the Vice President so against racial integration, gay rights and equal rights for women?

JG: Because they are not into liberation. They aren’t. It’s the politics of exclusion. I’m sure everybody is thrilled that Saddam is gone. There is no question about that. Nobody has a problem with that. Perhaps a lot of these guys that have been around since Gerald Ford shouldn’t have been supporting Saddam in the first place. And perhaps Halliburton shouldn’t have been doing business with him until 1998. But be that as it may, a lot of nations are guilty of supporting questionable regimes. Not just America. That’s a worldwide business-is-business issue.

TF: Why doesn’t that story get told in the mainstream media?

JG: It does in dribs and drabs. But the mainstream media has decided to be self-censoring. I suppose it’s because they don’t want to appear to be unlikable, un-American, or its because their corporate masters decree that they tow the party line or tow the establishment line and then of course you have THE NEW YORK POST and Fox whose job it is to not give the whole story.

TF: But Fox’s journalism is Fair and Balanced as they like to remind their viewers dozens of times every day.

JG: According to their definition. My friend Martin Lewis is filing a lawsuit against Fox News because of the words “fair” and “balanced.”

TF: In STEAL THIS MOVIE, you played the wife of the controversial Viet Nam era agitator, Abbie Hoffman. In that movie, federal agents seem to have much more power to openly bully anyone who was critical of the Nixon administration or the Viet Nam war. What was it about Abbie Hoffman that was so threatening that the government did anything they could to shut him up.

JG: It wasn’t just him. They were doing it to so many people. They followed and had files on people who were the most innocuous. There would be no reason in the world to have a file on them. Like Granny D [Doris Haddock] and Martin Luther King’s children.

I think that they saw in a guy like Abbie Hoffman a guy that really, charismatically, moves people. And he’s a guy who’s not afraid of them. And that’s what scares them the most when there are people that aren’t afraid of “them.” That aren’t afraid of the power base. That aren’t afraid of Cointelpro. Aren’t afraid of the government. Aren’t afraid of Joe McCarthy. I know he’s before Abbie Hoffman but they aren’t afraid of guys like Joe McCarthy. And when you are not afraid of McCarthyism and you are not afraid of repressive regimes and you are not afraid of Big Brother, then they wanna know about you.

(Excerpt) Read more at moviepoopshoot.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: apology; barf; garofalo; liar; traitor; who
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
Basically the entire interview is two extreme leftist complaining about how eeevile Republicans are and how censored Garafalo is.

Of special note is her attack on Fox (one of the few places that had her on) for being biased and her glee that one of her friends is suing the network for calling itself "fair and balanced."

I hope O'Reilly remembers that the next time he defends her as courageous for going on his show.

Of other note is her admission of being a recovering alcoholic. It makes one wonder if she has simply substituted a new addition (the spotlight) for the old.

And if anyone asks "where's the barf alert"...it's an interview with Jeaneane Garofalo. Her name alone is plenty of alert.

1 posted on 05/17/2003 7:51:00 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Movie Poop Shoot. Indeed!
2 posted on 05/17/2003 7:57:26 AM PDT by fat city
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Why do people think she's talented? She has only one "role" that she plays over and over.....and it's not funny. She doesn't even have large enough "star power" to make much of a difference, no matter what drivel comes out of her mouth.
3 posted on 05/17/2003 7:58:40 AM PDT by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
This woman is beneath contempt. She uses her "persona" to let us know her liberal soclialist viewpoint and quite frankly, the fast glib talk she puts out is nothing more than just surface. She doesn't really know anything but can put words together, thus getting the "folks" to listen to her and think she actually knows something. She heads up the Hollywood list of slime.
4 posted on 05/17/2003 7:58:58 AM PDT by cousair (aA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Check this out. Had to post it when reading this slop.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2831399046&category=15687
Not even worth a nickel! lol
5 posted on 05/17/2003 8:01:18 AM PDT by ozaukeemom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Who is Janeane Garofalo??
6 posted on 05/17/2003 8:01:20 AM PDT by got_moab?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Of special note is her attack on Fox (one of the few places that had her on) for being biased and her glee that one of her friends is suing the network for calling itself "fair and balanced."

Bubba-Jean Garbarfalo after Brian Kilmeade slam-dunked her as the idiot, liberal panty-waist she is . . .


7 posted on 05/17/2003 8:01:50 AM PDT by geedee (It ain't braggin' if the outcome meets or exceeds the outburst.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
JG: "There would be no reason in the world to have a file on them."

She must be making a parallel to people like Hillary Clinton and FBI files which are kept in private to be used for extortion and racketeering on innocent law abiding folk like most conservatives.

I've always found it interesting how liberals claim McCarthy was absurd when he suggested covert schemes were afoot in the 50/60s to create a more socialistic America. Do they sincerely believe America is less socialistic and more conservative today than during the era of McCarthy?

IMHO, the evidence would suggest there was something sound in McCarthy's cause. The mechanisms he employed may have had weaknesses, but the cause seems to have been very well substantiated by how socialization has overcome middle America and destoyed so much of our potential.

8 posted on 05/17/2003 8:02:00 AM PDT by Cvengr (0;^))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: got_moab?
Who is Janeane Garofalo??

Commercial spokesman for ToysRUs . No,thats Jeffrey Giraffe. Sorry.

9 posted on 05/17/2003 8:06:36 AM PDT by Captain Shady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
If you say that oil is a big motivator, a prime mover of the Bush Jr. Administration’s foreign policy agenda, people who discount any attempt to tell an alternate version of the story of the Bush Administration will say, “Oh, that’s crazy, that’s a ridiculous thing to say.” And that’s what proves that it’s oil. Why would they get so hyper about it? If it wasn’t oil, they’d just be like, easy going about it if people mentioned oil and said, “No, it isn’t.”

OMG, this is the depth of thought that takes up the majority of space in an otherwise vacuous liberal mind.

10 posted on 05/17/2003 8:06:42 AM PDT by finnman69 (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
"And I was like ..."
"And he was like ..."
"And then I was like ..."
"And then he was like all hyper and stuff."
"So I got like all quiet cause he was rambling on about freeing the Iraqis and stuff."

... Transcript of Bill O'Reilly's interview with Janeane Garofalo, written by Janeane Garofalo.
11 posted on 05/17/2003 8:15:13 AM PDT by GenXFreedomFighter (Make the liberals angry ... SUCCEED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
They and everyone that shares their views can stick their thoughts where the sun don't shine!
12 posted on 05/17/2003 8:15:36 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
"Basically the entire interview is two extreme leftist complaining about how eeevile Republicans are and how censored Garafalo is"

She and the author seem to think all Republicans are angry white males, too...but Garafolo, Sarandon and Natalie Maines took a far bigger beating from conservative women, because we're tired of these uneduacated, irrational, shallow, hormonally-driven, megalomaniacs vapidly spouting hateful stupidity into the faces of mainstream America, therebye making ALL women look bad.

They seem to have forgotten there is probably no more dangerous creature on Earth than a truely ticked off female.

Just my 2 cents as a conservative woman tired of having these alien beings shoved down our throats as some kind of epitome of womanhood.

13 posted on 05/17/2003 8:16:27 AM PDT by cake_crumb (UN Resolutions=Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
My friend Martin Lewis is filing a lawsuit against Fox News

He is one NASTY leftie, I think he's British, an old favorite at CNN. I hope the SCUMBAG LAWYERS charge him double for his idiotic loser lawsuit.

14 posted on 05/17/2003 8:41:46 AM PDT by Mister Baredog ((They wanted to kill 50,000 of us on 9/11, we will never forget!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Tim Robbins doesn't get "picked on" as much as his lovely lady because most people know he is only mouthing her thought for the day. PS, BLL - I'm from the sauerkraut capital of the area. We're practically neighbors.
15 posted on 05/17/2003 8:48:14 AM PDT by pacobell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
From interview -- JG: According to their definition. My friend Martin Lewis is filing a lawsuit against Fox News because of the words “fair” and “balanced.”

Jon Stewart of the Daily Show recently had Diane Ravitch on as a guest, promoting her new book which discusses how political correctness is destroying the English language. Jon Stewart was fascinated by this topic and clearly enjoyed having Diane Ravitch as his guest. By contrast, JG's friend's lawsuit sound trivial. The promotion of a news show, through use of the words "fair" and "balanced," is not cause for a lawsuit. However, I think a rule or law eliminating such words used that way might be the basis of a complaint about violation of Free Speech.
16 posted on 05/17/2003 8:49:30 AM PDT by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
Janeane Garofalo is a human cigarette butt....

Yes, let the Demcrats showcase their loony ideologues -- the Baldwins, Moores, Sarandons, Frankens and Garafalos. With each and every interview a few more Democratic voters realize this party indeed represents the criminally insane.

17 posted on 05/17/2003 9:01:39 AM PDT by F16Fighter (Democrats -- The Party of Stalin and Chiraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg
read later bump
18 posted on 05/17/2003 9:03:53 AM PDT by nutmeg (USA: Land of the Free - Thanks to the Brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
She is one sick bitch. In the full interview she confesses to purposefully looking like a skank. Who does that? Why?
And I didn't know Cheney was against racial integration. I'll have to think before I vote in 2004!
Ugly, ugly stuff.
19 posted on 05/17/2003 9:06:14 AM PDT by thegreatbeast (Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
BOYCOTT HOLLYWEIRD!!!
20 posted on 05/17/2003 9:07:18 AM PDT by Ed_in_NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson