Skip to comments.
Searching for Weapons of Mass Destruction, Larry Elder
WorldNetDaily ^
| Larry Elder
Posted on 05/16/2003 9:51:27 PM PDT by Stuckathome
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Great post, sorry if already posted.
To: Stuckathome
Great story, indeed. I like Larry Elder. He knows how to cut through the BS.
2
posted on
05/16/2003 9:59:26 PM PDT
by
microgood
(They will all die......most of them.)
To: Stuckathome
I have no use for Hussein. I believe he was a half-mad tyrant. Having said that, I suspect the WMD talk was hype to create a super boogie man to justify a war. I suspect we won't find much. As far as the Iraqi scientists comments, they'd better say what their saying. This wouldn't be the time to be offending the wrong people.
According to the hype, WMD were everywhere like dandelions. We have managed to find hidden loot stolen from the museums, but little in the way of WMD.
3
posted on
05/16/2003 10:17:10 PM PDT
by
RLK
To: RLK
Having said that, I suspect the WMD talk was hype to create a super boogie man to justify a war. I like the scenario on another thread where the author said that Iraq's WMD were destroyed without Saddam's knowledge, and the money for ongoing WMD development stolen by Saddam's sons and generals.
Boy the "boogie man" sure fooled the rest of the world --- if RLK is to be proven correct.
4
posted on
05/16/2003 10:47:32 PM PDT
by
Mike Darancette
(Soddom has left the bunker.)
To: Stuckathome
We can't find Saddam Hussein either, but that doesn't mean he doesn't (or didn't) exist.
To: Stuckathome
The U.S. and allies removed the worst weapon of mass destruction -- Saddam Hussein and his murderous thugs. Anything in addition to that is a bonus.
6
posted on
05/17/2003 12:15:00 AM PDT
by
Wilhelm Tell
(Lurking since 1997!)
To: Stuckathome
Bush may have already found the WMD. But is waiting for the democrats to spend
millions of dollars on campaign adds before breaking the news. BINGO. Dumbo
has outwitted the democrats once again. They will never learn.
7
posted on
05/17/2003 5:12:54 AM PDT
by
chainsaw
To: rdb3; Khepera; elwoodp; MAKnight; condolinda; mafree; Trueblackman; FRlurker; Teacher317; ...
Sage of South Central alert!
Black conservative ping
If you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)
Extra warning: this is a high-volume ping list.
8
posted on
05/17/2003 5:14:53 AM PDT
by
mhking
To: Stuckathome
I don't need to see no steeking WMD's. Saddam was bad, the Iraqi people were brutalized and we freed them. No WMD's? So what!
9
posted on
05/17/2003 5:21:18 AM PDT
by
showme_the_Glory
(No more rhyming, and I mean it! ..Anybody got a peanut.....)
To: Stuckathome
After reading the headline, I thought, "Well, the WMD may be well hidden, but Larry Elder should be easy to find."
bump
To: Stuckathome
Bump for later reading.
12
posted on
05/17/2003 10:17:08 PM PDT
by
SuziQ
To: RLK
I suspect the WMD talk was hype...Besides the bio-labs on wheels, the Tigres has been polluted with mustard gas (compounds), cyanide, and binary munitions (sure, precursors nearby, but no VX, etc.) have been found. Also, lots of radioactive by-products and precision machining equipment (yes, no bomb). This will take time...to prove it to the den of thieves in NY.
5.56mm
13
posted on
05/17/2003 10:30:53 PM PDT
by
M Kehoe
To: M Kehoe; RLK
Plus chemical warfare training manuals, chem suits, general NBC training of the Republican guard, atropine distributed to the populace, radio intercepts, humint, etc.
No, this stuff will be found (in large quanities).
5.56mm
14
posted on
05/17/2003 10:36:58 PM PDT
by
M Kehoe
To: RLK
If all the talk of WMD was just hype how do you explain the neocons' 1998 letter to Clinton - urging him to do what Bush recently did?
To: liberallarry
If all the talk of WMD was just hype how do you explain the neocons' 1998 letter to Clinton - urging him to do what Bush recently did?
--------------------------------
I'm not responsible for other people's urging. I am only responsible for my own ideas and evaluations.
16
posted on
05/18/2003 10:05:22 AM PDT
by
RLK
To: RLK
17
posted on
05/19/2003 12:08:33 PM PDT
by
enraged
(Religion of piece)
To: Stuckathome
Everyone has been looking for the hardware and the physics. Even harder to find and more important will be the Technology. I have no doubt, should this group or similar minded leaders come to power, having the technology in "stand-by", they could have WMD ready in short order.
Another thought would be if the technology is well developed, these scientists can find a ready market for it. That's one reason they may not be that cooperative in finding evidence.
18
posted on
05/19/2003 8:38:25 PM PDT
by
NJJ
To: Stuckathome
The administration urges patience, noting that thousands of sites remain to be inspected. Before the war, opponents urged patience. After all, they claimed, the "inspections were working." With major fighting concluded, however, the very same people demand an immediate "smoking gun" to prove the existence of weapons of mass destruction.
Does anyone else see this? Pre-war:
Bush admin: "Let's go already!" Opponents: "Be patient"
post-war:
Opponents: "Let's go already!" Bush admin: "Be patient"
Plus la change, plus la meme chose.
19
posted on
05/20/2003 12:15:02 AM PDT
by
lurky
(sports drink devotee)
To: Wilhelm Tell
The U.S. and allies removed the worst weapon of mass destruction -- Saddam Hussein and his murderous thugs. Spin it, Wilhelm. The fact is that the Bush admin told us they had incontiveritble proof of WMD, hence war. The casus belli, dude. The very reason for war. They should find them, and quick, else they (or the Pentagon) has some splainin' to do.
20
posted on
05/20/2003 12:18:48 AM PDT
by
lurky
(sports drink devotee)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson