Posted on 05/15/2003 3:00:26 PM PDT by cpforlife.org
FaxNotes May 15, 2003
Rep. Paul Introduces Three Pro-Life Bills The following is a statement delivered in the U.S. House of Representatives on April 2, 2003, by Congressman Ron Paul, M.D.
Mr. Speaker, I rise today to introduce three bills relating to abortion.
First, the Freedom of Conscience Act of 2003 (H.R. 1548) prohibits any federal official from expending any federal funds for any population control or population planning program or any family planning activity. It is immoral to force the American taxpayers to subsidize programs and practices they find morally abhorrent.
Second, I rise to introduce the Partial-birth Abortion Funding Ban Act of 2003 (H.R. 1545). This bill prohibits federal officials from paying any federal funds to any individual or entity that performs partial-birth abortions. The taxpayer must not be forced to fund this barbaric procedure.
Finally, my Life-Protecting Judicial Limitation Act of 2003 (H.R. 1546) provides that the inferior courts of the United States do not have jurisdiction to hear abortion-related cases. Congress must use the authority granted to it in Article 3, Section 1 of the Constitution. The district courts of the United States, as well as the United States Court of Federal Claims, should not have the authority to hear these types of cases.
Mr. Speaker, it is my hope that my colleagues will join me in support of these three bills. By following the Constitution and using the power granted to the Congress by this document, we can restore freedom of conscience and the sanctity of human life. [emphasis added]
___________________________________
These bills are pro-active measures that, if enacted, would greatly reduce the power and influence of the abortion lobby in this country and at the same time reduce the number of abortions and abortion-related activities currently funded with our tax dollars.
Please insist that your Member of Congress support Congressman Pauls efforts by co-sponsoring these three bills. Capitol Switchboard 202/224-3121.
Please visit our web site at: http://www.rnclife.org
To receive FaxNotes, send the message "subscribe rnclife2" to majordomo@bg1.iserver.net. To be removed from the list, send the message "unsubscribe rnclife2."
Please explain?
The greatest evil is not done in those sordid dens of evil that Dickens loved to paint but is conceived and ordered (moved, seconded, carried, and minuted) in clear, carpeted, warmed, well-lighted offices, by quiet men with white collars and cut fingernails and smooth-shaven cheeks who do not need to raise their voices. C. S. Lewis
1973 United States Supreme Court
Note that the only two who voted against the majority in Roe v Wade (against MURDERING babies) are on the right side of the photo. Rehnquist standing and White seated. Now isnt that interesting .Hmmmm
"Abortion? I am all for it
for certain undesirable organizations
"Abort N.O.W., NARAL, and Planned Parenthood!
Abort Roe v Wade and all laws that allow the
MURDER of my unborn friends!"
"Life is Sacred from the moment of conception!"
Click here to read a press release from the current president of the
Federation of Americans waiting to be born.
Sarcasm....
Well that's what "they" want folks to believe. In my book, Ron Paul is a true conservative.
Not exactly. The Libertarins are, but that probably explains why he left the party and refuses any of their efforts to draft him in future campaigns. Also explains the platform of the LP candidate who runs AGAINST Ron every year (probably doesn't think Ron is "pure" enough for his tastes.
Ron's views on immigration are still way out there, however.
No. Ron Paul is one of those who would put the little "l" in conservative-libertarianism.
I will be voting for the incumbent at that time, George W Bush.........and he will win.
2012...................Mr Paul has something to say. It's worth a listen.
First, the Freedom of Conscience Act of 2003 (H.R. 1548) prohibits any federal official from expending any federal funds for any population control or population planning program or any family planning activity. It is immoral to force the American taxpayers to subsidize programs and practices they find morally abhorrent.
Second, I rise to introduce the Partial-birth Abortion Funding Ban Act of 2003 (H.R. 1545). This bill prohibits federal officials from paying any federal funds to any individual or entity that performs partial-birth abortions. The taxpayer must not be forced to fund this barbaric procedure.
Finally, my Life-Protecting Judicial Limitation Act of 2003 (H.R. 1546) provides that the inferior courts of the United States do not have jurisdiction to hear abortion-related cases. Congress must use the authority granted to it in Article 3, Section 1 of the Constitution. The district courts of the United States, as well as the United States Court of Federal Claims, should not have the authority to hear these types of cases.
There isn't anything I wouldn't support here.
It is immoral to force the American taxpayers to subsidize programs and practices they find morally abhorrent.
Voting 'yes' here.
The taxpayer must not be forced to fund this barbaric procedure.
I'll vote 'yes' here also............
Mr Paul uses terms that show how he feels about such practices...........immoral and barbaric....certainly not vote disqualifying words to me.
If anyone wants on or off my ProLife Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.
Good for Ron Paul in introducing these bills! Let's pray for swift passage of all of them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.