Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wall Street Journal Needs to Fire Alan Murray! (Murray Hit Piece in Journal)
Wall Street Journal ^ | 05/13/03 | Alan Murray

Posted on 05/13/2003 11:38:16 AM PDT by Pubbie

Exile on G Street: Economists Play Peripheral Role for Bush

WASHINGTON -- Someone needs to stand up for the eggheads -- those academic economists who've descended from their ivory towers to serve for a few years on the White House Council of Economic Advisers.

As Dana Milbank of the Washington Post reported last week, the eggheads have been banished to Bratislava. Well, OK, not Bratislava, but 1800 G St., which is almost as bad. Power in the executive branch diminishes geometrically as you move away from the Oval Office. That is why smart staffers would rather have a cupboard in the West Wing than a coffered-ceilinged suite in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building. And it is why they would rather slit their wrists than leave the Eisenhower building for 1800 G St., which is what the CEA has been asked to do.

White House spokeswoman Claire Buchan insists the CEA's move isn't meant to "dis" the eggheads -- it's simply an accident of time and place. The council once occupied a beautiful suite of offices along 17th Street, next door to the White House. After Sept. 11, 2001, those street-side offices were abandoned for security reasons, forcing it to take up temporary residence in the basement.

But this is about more than office space. The Bush administration, starting at the top, is anti-intellectual. The folks at the CEA are the kids who stayed in the dorm room studying differential equations while George W. Bush was playing bladder ball and Karl Rove was striving for global domination of the College Republicans. President Bush prefers to get his advice on the economy from people who've been successful in the business world. Come to think of it, he seems to prefer even people who have been unsuccessful in the business world. The eggheads, for the most part, never met a payroll.

But relying on capitalists to keep a capitalist system humming is a mistake. Businessmen, by and large, don't like free and open markets. From John D. Rockefeller on, they have found markets to be messy, chaotic and insufficiently profitable. Whether it's oil companies seeking special tax preferences, steel companies seeking trade protection or pharmaceuticals companies seeking excessive patent protection, businessmen -- particularly when working hand in glove with government -- are among the greatest enemies of a free-market economy.

In a new book, "Saving Capitalism from the Capitalists," two eggheads from the University of Chicago -- Raghuram G. Rajan and Luigi Zingales -- puncture the notion that free markets operate best when government is absent. Touring developing nations around the globe, they argue persuasively that free markets "cannot flourish without the very visible hand of government." The real challenge is to ensure that the government acts to protect the marketplace, rather than protecting those who wish to dominate the marketplace (the greater risk in Republican administrations) or those who lost out in the marketplace (the greater risk in Democratic administrations).

That's where the Council of Economic Advisers comes in -- or should come in. These are folks who have spent their lives studying markets. Sure, they are often excruciatingly naive about the ways of Washington, but so are many of the businessmen who serve in government. Furthermore, no one is suggesting letting the eggheads run things. If they do their job right, they can be -- and should be -- a critical part of any administration devoted to free markets.

Republican-leaning economists are quick to point out that the Clinton administration was as dismissive of the council as the Bush administration is. That's partly because to better coordinate economic policy, President Clinton created the National Economic Council, which became a rival to the CEA and its influence. It's also because Mr. Clinton allowed academic economists to occupy higher positions in his government. Harvard University economist Lawrence Summers, who was blocked by Al Gore from becoming chairman of the council because of his not-so-green views on the environment, got a job at the Treasury Department as a consolation prize. He went on to become Treasury secretary. And he and other Clinton eggheads, including those at the CEA, saved that administration from many of its own worst impulses -- fighting against excessive environmental regulation, for instance, and for fiscal restraint.

With the departure of Lawrence Lindsey, there are no such high-ranking economists in the Bush administration. But there is plenty of need. The government is preparing to tackle the devilishly complex issue of creating a functioning market for health care to control costs. If it allows drug companies and insurance companies and hospitals to guide its policies, it surely will fail. Those companies are all in search of more power in the marketplace -- not a marketplace that forces them to charge lower prices...

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: alanmurray; economy; georgebush
What the &*(&(*^ is this Dickhead doing at the Wall Street Journal?!

Also sending John Harwood and Alan Hunt out into the unemployment office, would help the journal out too...

1 posted on 05/13/2003 11:38:16 AM PDT by Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
But relying on capitalists to keep a capitalist system humming is a mistake.

Kind of says it all.

2 posted on 05/13/2003 11:42:22 AM PDT by jwalburg (Knowledge is power; power corrupts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
The idea of "market failure" and the need for government intervention is a crock. I have heard that there are a lot of socialists in the economist field.
3 posted on 05/13/2003 11:43:25 AM PDT by vpintheak (Our Liberties we prize, and our rights we will maintain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
The show he (Alan Murray) hosts each night with extreme-liberal Gloria Borger is only the third worst show on CNBC, following CheckPoint with the limited brainpower of Martha McWhatsHerName and that Clintonista FBI apologist Christopher Whitcomb, while the absolute worst still having to be Tina Brown's ill-fated and now hopefully even already dismissed talk show.
4 posted on 05/13/2003 11:45:09 AM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
If you don't treat government with reverence, you don't get invited to the nice parties in Washington. I don't think it's any more complicated than that.
5 posted on 05/13/2003 11:49:22 AM PDT by NativeNewYorker (Freepin' Jew Boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.
I like CNBC's market coverage, and also I like Kudlow and Cramer, however they need to focus on economics and stop birnging in Liberal wankers like Alan Murray, to discuss politics, or if they want to discuss politics, at least bring in some Conservatives to balance out the Communists.
6 posted on 05/13/2003 11:49:34 AM PDT by Pubbie (Bill Owens for Prez and Jeb as VP in '08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
Murray is right there with his fellow-traveler, Al Hunt... I can't tell you how depressed I was when the CNBC show "The WSJ Editorial Board with Stuart Varney" was replaced with Alan Murray's every evening monstrosity. The former show was the best hour of the week on talk TV.
7 posted on 05/13/2003 12:13:53 PM PDT by ReleaseTheHounds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReleaseTheHounds
I know, Very sad situation :(
8 posted on 05/13/2003 12:17:18 PM PDT by Pubbie (Bill Owens for Prez and Jeb as VP in '08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
>puncture the notion that free markets operate best when government is absent

It's easy to puncture a strawman isn't it? Since no one argues that the government should be "absent", I suppose these "esteemed" authors have nothing better to do than to poke holes in beliefs no one holds anyway.
9 posted on 05/13/2003 12:51:50 PM PDT by jagrmeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
Those that can do and those that can't write/teach. Murray is a fool that has been in his job so long that people think he knows what he is talking about.
10 posted on 05/13/2003 1:36:10 PM PDT by q_an_a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson