Skip to comments.
Homosexual Groups Admit ‘10%’ Figure Is Wrong
Traditional Values Coalition ^
| Friday, May 09 @ 15:27:45 CDT
| Traditional Values Coalition
Posted on 05/12/2003 9:23:01 AM PDT by Remedy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 281-285 next last
To: ffusco
The lower numbers are based on surveys. There haven't been too many but, in the ones that have been done, the numbers seem to jive rather well. Personally, I doubt people would have responded in those surveys that they were gay/lesbian unless they really were.
What's key here is how the internet can provide ammunition to counter the "big lies".
The media have been happy to parrot what their favorite special interest groups tell them. Repeat it enough and the country starts to assume it has validity.
The war in Iraq showed the public how CNN & the NYT would lie to promote their viewpoints. The embedded reporters showed us success and these news organs labeled it failure. They were our own version of the Iraqi Information Minister.
To: Mr. K
and I am not buying the 2.8% claim either- nature does not make that many mistakes in a species (one out of 50???) and survive I don't think it's all genetically determined. More an aspect of the mental stresses of the Human Zoo. Human needs are also almost effortlessly met due the advanced stage of civilization, so Darwinary processes aren't going to cull the herd anyway, but they will shape it (e.g. rich guys, hot wives, beautiful children - the Master Race of Money, etc.)
To: Remedy
Homosexual Groups Admit 10% Figure Is Wrong and admit they are "pushing" for 15%...
After they break down all moral barriers, perhaps even the % of bestiality will reach 20%. It has always been about breaking down society. Piece by piece, tradition after tradition.
To: kegler4
You're right, this isn't exactly breaking news. This really should be posted at lefty web forums. There are many gays who still subscribe to the one-in-ten theory.
To: Remedy
Kinsey's published data reveal that homosexuals are much more willing to "try it" with an animal, a child, a man, many women, or for that matter "something completely different." If you haven't ever tried it with a melon, you haven't lived.
45
posted on
05/12/2003 10:03:05 AM PDT
by
Maceman
To: Remedy
I suspect that the percentage in Hollywood is way over 10 percent.
46
posted on
05/12/2003 10:03:17 AM PDT
by
biblewonk
(Spose to be a Chrissssstian)
To: biblewonk
Bump for later viewing
To: jejones
You'll make his brain hurt.
48
posted on
05/12/2003 10:05:11 AM PDT
by
JoshGray
To: Paradox
I had bought the 10% figure. Didn't really matter to me since I am not against gays per se, just their politics. But I feel like an idiot for believing the figure in the first place, of COURSE they would make statistics up to support their cause... The 10% figure was pulled out from Kinsey's "research" whose database was severly skewed due to his non-random sampling.
49
posted on
05/12/2003 10:05:42 AM PDT
by
cinFLA
To: Mr. K
Hmmm. Down from 10% to 2.8%. Does that make them eligible for Endangered Species Act consideration?
50
posted on
05/12/2003 10:06:41 AM PDT
by
CedarDave
(The number of Saddam sightings is rapidly approaching those of Elvis!)
To: Mr. K
"and I am not buying the 2.8% claim either- nature does not make that many mistakes in a species (one out of 50???) and survive" No, it was just nature's way of ensuring that our caves were well decorated, and our fire dances were well choreographed.
51
posted on
05/12/2003 10:06:56 AM PDT
by
elfman2
Comment #52 Removed by Moderator
To: Mr. K
>>one out of 50???
FWIW:
1/0.028 = 35.71428571428572, more like one in 36.
To: Remedy
Realityaphobic gay agenda.
54
posted on
05/12/2003 10:07:16 AM PDT
by
ChadGore
(It's all an Amish plot)
To: Remedy
I just can't imagine how I knew you would post a link as an answer.
I abhor what they're doing in the Mass. school system. I think it's wrong and should be changed. But this link contains absolutely no proof that anybody's "recruiting" 6 year olds to become homosexual.
My son is a 4th grader in a public school system and he still doesn't know what homosexuality is. The recruiters had better hurry up or they might lose him.
And please don't post another link as a reply.
55
posted on
05/12/2003 10:08:34 AM PDT
by
kegler4
To: GSWarrior
56
posted on
05/12/2003 10:09:34 AM PDT
by
Remedy
To: kegler4
POST #56
57
posted on
05/12/2003 10:10:21 AM PDT
by
Remedy
To: Remedy
In what will go down as one of the most underreported stories of the year... An unfortunate choice of words in this particular article.
58
posted on
05/12/2003 10:10:39 AM PDT
by
wimpycat
('Nemo me impune lacessit')
To: jejones
I don't take Kinsey and Co. seriously on anything. The man was a pervert and his main goal might have been simply to rationalize his lust. This was a very sick man.
As for gays willing to try anything, thats polymorphic perversion. If its resembles a hole...........
59
posted on
05/12/2003 10:10:48 AM PDT
by
ffusco
(Maecilius Fuscus, Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
To: elfman2
No, it was just nature's way of ensuring that our caves were well decorated, and our fire dances were well choreographed.
ROTFLMAO!!!!!!
60
posted on
05/12/2003 10:12:14 AM PDT
by
ffusco
(Maecilius Fuscus, Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 281-285 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson