Skip to comments.
Homosexual Groups Admit ‘10%’ Figure Is Wrong
Traditional Values Coalition ^
| Friday, May 09 @ 15:27:45 CDT
| Traditional Values Coalition
Posted on 05/12/2003 9:23:01 AM PDT by Remedy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 281-285 next last
To: Remedy
This is all pretty much what most people know instinctually. That is, that homosexuality is really about lust gone wild, and addiction. Once I was old enough to understand that homosexuals typically play the role of man and woman in their sick little private lives, I knew that underneath their strange acting out that they craved normality. I suppose that is why they want to adopt children too; unless it's to fulfill the old axiom of "misery enjoys company". The truth always has a way of making itself known. In actuality, I doubt that even 1% of the population are homosexuals. Their real sickness is self hatred and a death wish.
To: Remedy
I know what the activists claim Kinsey said. I also know what Kinsey did say.
Activists, pro- or anti-gay, aren't to be taken at face value.
22
posted on
05/12/2003 9:44:48 AM PDT
by
JoshGray
To: BibChr
Surveying The Arts, one could get the impression that about 87.4% 874% are homosexual.
23
posted on
05/12/2003 9:47:08 AM PDT
by
Remedy
To: Remedy
Even giving them the benefit of the doubt, and we accept that 5% is gay, how is it then that this small minority is allowed to dictate to the other 95%.
I have been saying this for years. We are allowing small minorities, hispanics, gays, disabled, etc. dictate to us. It has to stop. We have to say, "You are the minority, deal with it."
24
posted on
05/12/2003 9:48:26 AM PDT
by
raybbr
To: Paradox
But I feel like an idiot for believing the figure in the first place, Don't.
There has been a huge propaganda campaign to make perversion mainstream going back to Kinsey.
25
posted on
05/12/2003 9:49:09 AM PDT
by
Tribune7
To: Remedy
the three percent number is not reliable either. It seems they are using the footnote to buy legitimacy. They got caught in a lie and and using a smaller lie to say they are "honest" to admit their lie. Does this number count the number of people in the prison population who adjust their behavior to accomodate their circumstances? Who took these numbers? Where did these people "admit".
To: robertpaulsen
EXACTLY!!!
Dual gender is not pure homosexual. For this ONE PERCENT to demand so much is outrageous. I'm glad the truth has finally come out.
27
posted on
05/12/2003 9:49:56 AM PDT
by
CyberAnt
( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
To: Remedy
This is a BIGGIE!
The 10% figure was based on very questionable research done by one of the biggest weirdos of his day. It included using his wife as a surrogate, interviewing convicts and swingers and prostitutes....
28
posted on
05/12/2003 9:49:56 AM PDT
by
ffusco
(Maecilius Fuscus, Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
To: Remedy
lol, it does seem that way, doesn't it?
Dan
29
posted on
05/12/2003 9:50:53 AM PDT
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: Remedy
Several years ago, when I was in my twenties, I did a survey scientifically designed to identify the gays and lesbians I might encounter. The test was extremely scientific -- the criteria was whether this person was sexually attracted to me.
After more than 3 years of intensive field study I determined that Washington DC has absolutely no gay men but that it was chockablock with lesbians.
30
posted on
05/12/2003 9:51:45 AM PDT
by
DonQ
Comment #31 Removed by Moderator
To: Remedy
"...and to recruit public school children into the homosexual deathstyle."
Gimme a break. Yep, that homosexual lifestyle my fourth grade teacher is describing sounds so good I think I'll just become one. That's the ticket.
And the 10 percent figure was thoroughly debunked many, many years ago. Heck, you could see that was tripe just by being alive. So now a couple of homosexual groups have said it in a court document now.
Nothing to see here, folks. Just move along.
32
posted on
05/12/2003 9:53:46 AM PDT
by
kegler4
To: longtermmemmory
National Health & Social Life Survey
33
posted on
05/12/2003 9:54:08 AM PDT
by
Remedy
To: Mr. K
and I am not buying the 2.8% claim either- nature does not make that many mistakes in a species (one out of 50???) and survive Consider the sickle-cell anemia gene. You and I would both consider the homozygous recessive case a mistake, but in areas where malaria is common (and before insecticides and such, of course), heterozygotes have an advantage, so that the population would tend towards being heterozygous...but that would mean that 25% of children would be homozygous recessive and thus have sickle-cell anemia (given that both parents are heterozygous), rather more than 2.8%. You have to consider advantage for the species, not just the individual.
34
posted on
05/12/2003 9:54:39 AM PDT
by
jejones
To: kegler4
35
posted on
05/12/2003 9:55:48 AM PDT
by
Remedy
To: Mr. K
No, but man does. So this argues that homosexuality is a lifestyle choice.
To: Remedy
In a footnote on page 16 of this homosexual coalitions legal brief, they admit that "2.8% percent of the male, and 1.4% of the female, population identify themselves as gay, lesbian, or bisexual." They will still insist it's 10%, and that the rest are in obvious denial.
To: Mr. K
. . . and I am not buying the 2.8% claim either- nature does not make that many mistakes in a species (one out of 50???) and survive. The 2.8% figure may be reasonable, since "nature" is only a minor component in homosexuality. Heredity plays far less of a role than family environment as a determining factor.
To: ffusco
The 10% figure was based on very questionable research done by one of the biggest weirdos of his day. It included using his wife as a surrogate, interviewing convicts and swingers and prostitutes.... Given that, it seems odd to see in this thread the citing of another of Kinsey's results (that homosexuals are supposedly willing to try anything to satisfy their lusts) as if it were significant, doesn't it?
39
posted on
05/12/2003 9:58:52 AM PDT
by
jejones
Comment #40 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 281-285 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson