1 posted on
05/08/2003 7:44:36 AM PDT by
TomGuy
To: TomGuy; 1Mike; 3catsanadog; ~Kim4VRWC's~; A CA Guy; A Citizen Reporter; abner; Aeronaut; AFPhys; ...
Estrada vote ping!!!!
2 posted on
05/08/2003 7:46:28 AM PDT by
Howlin
To: TomGuy
Yawn...Ho Hum
10 posted on
05/08/2003 7:51:15 AM PDT by
cynicom
To: TomGuy
They'll probably screw him over again, along with Owen. I take this and send it to every person I know. Tommorrow will be the 3rd year anniversary of their nominations.
14 posted on
05/08/2003 7:55:18 AM PDT by
pulaskibush
(Make them pay)
To: TomGuy
ASK THE DEMOCRATS HOW MUCH THIS IS COSTING OUR COUNTRY?
TWO SIMULTANEOUS FILLIBUSTERS!
To: TomGuy
OK, one more time with feeling!!!
Any bets (Bennettesque) on the outcome. I'm guessing: same old - same old.
To: TomGuy
Will this be on CSPAN 2?
Do you know what they'll do for the May 9th anniversary?
To: TomGuy; 1tin_soldier; a-whole-nother-box-of-pandoras; Ahban; Arkansawyer; Arkinsaw; Asphodel; ...
Pinged to all in Arkansas. We should have kept Hutchinson, but right now we need to get rid of Blanche Lincoln who so far has voted against Estrada everytime.
To: TomGuy
So far, the Republican Senate strategy appears to be simply to annoy the Democrats enough to convince them to give up. The electorate could care less about "getting it on the record." The record won't mean a thing next November. The Democrats may be playing with fire, but so far they haven't been so much as singed.
To: TomGuy
I'll believe that the Senate majority is serious about judicial confirmations when they force the RATs to hold an honest-to-god continuous all night long filibuster.
To: TomGuy
Here's the actual record
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=108&session=1&vote=00140
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=108&session=1&vote=00114
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=108&session=1&vote=00056
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=108&session=1&vote=00053
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=108&session=1&vote=00040
33 posted on
05/08/2003 8:24:10 AM PDT by
pulaskibush
(Tell everyone you can find about this over and over again!)
To: TomGuy
Hmmmmmmmmmn.
Notice that they don't even attempt to assume that a 24/7/52 filibuster WILL be mandated: there's another bill schedlued right afterwards.
46 posted on
05/08/2003 9:04:17 AM PDT by
Robert A Cook PE
(I support FR monthly; and ABBCNNBCBS (continue to) Lie!)
To: TomGuy
Cloture?
I thought the RATs were holding a fillibuster....But my memory of Civics class far too many years ago basically would shut down the Senate to all other business until the issue was resolved or put to rest. This is far from what the RATs have been doing - The senate just keeps on plugging at other business. The vote to confirm Estrada gets held up....and is now heading for a cloture vote...
Of course, I still am of the opinion that using a fillibuster against a Presidential judicial appointee's confirmation is a streach of constitutional powers.....
49 posted on
05/08/2003 9:14:28 AM PDT by
TheBattman
(You can Tune a Piano, but you can't Tuna Fish.....)
To: TomGuy
did they chamge the time?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson